投稿一个月被拒的,我搜了不知道哪个好中,导师想让投sci,我觉得差不多就行了,这是被拒理由,Reviewers' comments:
Please rate the following criteria using only one of the five following words: BAD, WEAK, FAIR, GOOD, EXCELLENT
a) Relevance to Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Good
b) Originality: Fair
c) Significance; usefulness: Fair
d) Technical soundness: Weak
e) Reference to the related literature: Weak
f) Presentation: Weak
g) Linguistic quality: Good
See attached report
Reviewer #2: Dear authors,
most of your propositions are based on Lemma 2.2, that is actually a very good and interesting result. Unfortunately, its proof is not presented in the submission, and it can only be found on an accepted (but not published) paper, written in Chinese. If you don't provide a proof of that Lemma, the reader will never be able to assess if your results are correct or not.
Other comments:
1 - the paper needs a drastic English revision. It is barely understandable.
2 - the notations you propose are very confusing and not really adapted to the standard literature. Sometimes they change, sometimes are not introduces.
3 - why you only consider the minimum and the Lukasiewicsz t-norms?
4 - It is hard to see the scientific relevance of your proposal. Try to state clearly what is the objective of your paper.