查看: 2632  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zjujungle

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] ISA transactions会被镇压吗已有6人参与

ISA transactions这个期刊会被镇压吗,自引率已经40%以上了,最近几年,影响因子从1左右直升到2.9,觉得这个期刊对口,速度也可以,但是不敢投
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

月下行云

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by zjujungle at 2015-09-06 19:23:16
嗯,不打算投这个期刊了,这个期刊好像要求必须引用该期刊的文章,太不含蓄了...

楼主你好,我长期在这个期刊投稿和审稿,确实没有遇到过要求自引的情况。 IEEE TIE和TIM以前有这个要求,现在也没有了。  我窃以为目前的审稿强度和把关力度,ISA的水平虽然不及Journal of process control. 但是应该也相距正在缩小。 上述为个人意见。
你问的问题,我直接和主编沟通了。他的回复如下:也给其他虫友分享下。
Dear Dr. **,
Thanks for your email. I suggest that the 2014 rate of self-citation was a coincidence. In 2014, we had two special issues and the average number of published papers were much higher than previous years.
I hope that you continue your association with the journal as an author and a reviewer.

Sincerely,
Ahmad Rad
Editor-in-Chief
ISA Transactions - the Journal of Automation



At 08:39 PM 9/5/2015, you wrote:
Dear Prof. Rad,
          As a long-time reader and author of ISA Trans, I reallly appreciate the high quality of the papers and the editorials' hard work on organizing the issues.
However, I found that recently the journal's selfciting rate has reached 44% in 2014. It must be a coincidence but it may lead to some misunderstandings from other readers and Thomson Reuters, who may decide to supress the impact factor because of the high self-citation rate. In 2015, many good journals, e.g. IEEE Trans on Industrial informatics, has been dropped because of the high self-citing rate.
If so, it will definitely harm the long-time good reputation of ISA transactions.
Thus, I think it may be necessary for the editors to remind the authors to remove unnecessary citations to the ISA papers published in 2013 and 2014.
By doing so, the self-citation rate may be reduced in 2015's impact factor, which will be announced in 2016.
Regards
**
6楼2015-09-07 04:20:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

月下行云

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by w346024519 at 2016-01-16 19:18:35
审稿人,我投了一个这个期刊,当天就审稿了。这上面的文章大多是有很深的理论证明。我的没有这么深会不会跪啊。我的创新点就是设计简单,优势比较明显。跪谢...

有可能的,审稿随机性很大
10楼2016-01-17 09:52:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zjujungle 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 博士学校和博导方向哪个哪个重要? 50+3 小学者cyq 2022-06-25 8/400 2022-06-27 19:28 by 小学者cyq
[硕博家园] 读博or工作? +6 supremecc 2022-06-27 15/750 2022-06-27 18:09 by supremecc
[金属] 镁合金金相 +3 Z22135048 2022-06-23 6/300 2022-06-27 17:22 by Z22135048
[基金申请] 博后基金滑铁卢 +3 浪尖飞石 2022-06-23 3/150 2022-06-27 16:28 by 夏木荫浓
[有机交流] 请问如下反应属于那种类型的有机反应? +3 xshzhou 2022-06-25 5/250 2022-06-27 15:13 by 江东闲人
[基金申请] 材料纳米论文漫天飞,不是为了材料研究和应用,只是为了影响因子和帽子! +19 有余12 2022-06-23 23/1150 2022-06-27 14:55 by caiyafeinau
[考博] 读博建议 +16 Conie 2022-06-26 42/2100 2022-06-27 14:21 by Conie
[论文投稿] 祈福 +7 向许墨学习 2022-06-24 9/450 2022-06-27 13:56 by zmfzj
[论文投稿] 今年第4篇sci录用,开心就好 +17 tanzhiheng 2022-06-25 17/850 2022-06-27 11:50 by yangyaoxia2008
[高分子] UV减黏胶 +4 ke0212 2022-06-22 6/300 2022-06-27 08:53 by ke0212
[硕博家园] 建议 +3 奔腾的小溪 2022-06-26 6/300 2022-06-26 23:53 by 自然人
[论文投稿] 第一通讯?二作有用吗? +9 孤独前行007 2022-06-21 10/500 2022-06-26 17:26 by 3611
[海外博后] 新加坡国立大学(NUS)化学系席雨濛课题组诚聘博士后 +4 yumengxi 2022-06-25 8/400 2022-06-26 15:15 by yumengxi
[电化学] 电化学工作站免费试用 +3 电化学66 2022-06-24 8/400 2022-06-26 13:11 by 电化学66
[论文投稿] ACS AMI审稿周期 +4 angel19860820 2022-06-24 5/250 2022-06-25 17:41 by 高大忙
[基金申请] 医学部什么时候会评? +7 jk59410 2022-06-22 10/500 2022-06-24 22:55 by wanqing2004
[电化学] 电化学工作站免费试用 +5 电化学66 2022-06-20 9/450 2022-06-24 19:48 by 电化学66
[考博] 求推荐博导 +5 xing820 2022-06-22 12/600 2022-06-23 18:23 by Gaii
[基金申请] 哪位大佬发一下博后面上名单? +12 Guerrouj 2022-06-22 12/600 2022-06-22 16:39 by klskyqh
[考博] 就业还是读博哪个选择更好一些 +12 小杨小张 2022-06-20 16/800 2022-06-22 15:31 by 带血腐肉骷髅
信息提示
请填处理意见