|
[求助]
关于OLED主体材料审稿意见
我是做OLED主体材料理论计算的,前段时间投了一篇杂志,审稿意见刚刚回来,不过有些地方看不太懂,尤其划重点线部分不理解,不知道审稿人具体指的什么,初次投文章没有太多经验,现在对此毫无头绪,非常急躁,非常希望资深者能给我指点一下,真的非常非常感激不尽!!!
ps:审稿意见附在下面
Reviewer #1: This manuscript aims at giving a theoretical insight allowing to rationalize the potentialities of D-A-D compounds as possible candidates for light-emitting devices.
While the overall scientific contribution is of interest for the community, the manuscript needs a thorough proofreading before being considered for publication in your Journal. Indeed, while some minor typographical mistakes do not decrease the readability of the report, the manuscript is absolutely not clear for any reader when technical details are considered. For instance, the authors should rewrite the computational details and state more clearly what are the target states (equilibrium geometries for energy evaluation) of their investigation, and, more importantly, what are the target inter-state transitions that they want to investigate.
More generally, a more precise, rigorous and detailed analysis of the results is required. Similarly, the reader absolutely needs to understand the precise targets of the calculations.
Again, I believe that this contribution reports interesting results for the community, but I cannot recommend it for publication in its present form.
Therefore, unless the manuscript is made more clear for the reader, I am unable to recommend it for publication in Journal of Molecular Modeling. |
|