| 查看: 939 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
文章大修，有如下几个问题（百金散尽求高手回复）已有1人参与
|
||
|
一，AudioSlides presentation是否需要 二，interactive phylogenetic trees是什么， 三，10 names of chemical compounds studied in the article 四，推荐润色公司 五，关于审稿人给的比较棘手的问题怎么回答？ 41. How many times the experiments were repeated? What program was used for regression analysis? In this report authors have seen only 1 log difference (10 times) in lowest detection limit between method I and II. How reproducible this difference was? Generally only 1 log difference is not reproducible.(大意是不是两种方法最低检测限只相差一个数量级，而通常一个数量级的差别是不可重复的？)我不知道这种说法来源于哪里？ 附信件如后 Dear Dr. , I am pleased to inform you that the Editor and a reviewer have now commented on your paper. In its present form, the paper is not acceptable and requires some corrections before it could be published in FOOD CONTROL. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/foodcont/ and login as an Author. Your username is: lnq555@126.com If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/foodcont/automail_query.asp On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there. Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation. PLEASE NOTE: Food Control would like to enrich its relevant online articles by displaying interactive phylogenetic trees that allow the reader to interactively explore the underlying research data. Hence, if applicable, we would like to invite you to upload your phylogenetic tree data files in the Newick or NeXML format as supplementary material to our online submission system. Elsevier will generate interactive phylogenetic trees from these files and include them with the online article on SciVerse ScienceDirect. If you wish, you can submit .NEW/.NWK (Newick) or .XML (NeXML) files along with your revised submission. PLEASE NOTE: Food Control would like to invite you to enrich your article by including a list of up to 10 names of chemical compounds studied in the article. The list of compounds will be used to extract relevant information from the NCBI PubChem Compound database and display it next to the online version of the article on ScienceDirect. To learn how this can be done please refer to the "Chemical compounds" section of the Guide for Authors or check http://www.elsevier.com/PubChem The revised version of your submission is due by 2015-02-15 00:00:00.000. Yours sincerely, ......... On Behalf of the Editorial Board - Food Control To the author: One reviewer recommend reject and often I will reject the paper. However, both reviewers provided information to improve the paper greatly. In particular if you can ask native English speaking colleagues to proof reading and correct your English writing or use a language service to do so. I decided to give you a chance to do a major revision. If you do not correct the English language, please do not resubmit the paper. Your revised paper will be reviewed by the reviewers to see if it is good enough to process further for Food Control. Food Control is a high impact international journal and we have high standards particularly on English language for our global readers,.......the Editor |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
无under review，直接DIP，咋么办。
已经有4人回复
-
最近遇到这样一个问题
已经有10人回复
-
小孩7岁，上一年级，不自信，学习较差
已经有34人回复
-
家乡二本高校/沿海传统私企，如何抉择？
已经有14人回复
-
一审一个审稿人，小修，会怎么样呀？
已经有8人回复
-
某系主任被同校教授举报包养情妇、长期嫖娼
已经有17人回复
-
找一个允许我去清华联合培养的研究生导师
已经有14人回复
-
考研英语带学
已经有6人回复
-
事业单位还是大学好？
已经有18人回复
-
24/25读博求博导
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 文章大修，审稿人问题比较尖锐
已经有31人回复
- 文章大修时间限制
已经有14人回复
- 文章大修后接收，Comments from the Editors and Reviewers为什么为空？
已经有39人回复
- 文章大修后其中有不想修改的问题
已经有3人回复
- 文章大修提交稿件，投稿系统的一些操作不明白，请求帮助！
已经有21人回复
- 论文大修回复的问题
已经有9人回复
- 关于chemical communications 怎么大修的几个问题
已经有9人回复
- 文章大修后，又返回大修，而且回复的二审意见和一审意见是一样的，请可咋整呐
已经有15人回复
- 文章大修，个人不同意审稿人意见
已经有11人回复
- 关于文章大修的问题
已经有4人回复
- 文章大修，可以改小部分数据吗？
已经有13人回复
- 文章大修后一般几天修回？
已经有18人回复
- chemcomm大修，第一次投文章，一些问题不知道怎么回答，虫子们帮帮忙啊！
已经有17人回复
- 文章大修，有一个数据错误，咋办？
已经有20人回复
- 文章大修审稿人提出的问题有一个不能解释原因还能被录用吗
已经有11人回复
- JAP文章大修后，审稿人神速回复（20分钟），不知是凶是吉【已经接受，谢谢各位关心】
已经有39人回复
- 论文大修，问题一大堆，修改意见四页多，修后录用可能性大不？
已经有30人回复
- 论文大修意见感觉比较难回复，打算放弃，然后还想在同一杂志上投另一篇文章，可以吗
已经有9人回复
- 文章大修之后
已经有26人回复
- 急！大修的文章被拒的可能性大吗？？
已经有20人回复
- 求助：关于文章大修
已经有15人回复
- 文章被要求大修，没有这方面经验，恳求各位朋友给建议
已经有14人回复
- 文章大修，面目全非，怎么回修改意见？
已经有10人回复
- 大修后文章直接录用，谈点经验与虫子们共勉
已经有671人回复
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2015-01-07 17:01:56
10