| 查看: 3173 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者solskjaer300将赠送您 50 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
solskjaer300新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
求助，有大神投过GJR吗？我的审稿意见请大神看看，有疑问已有2人参与
|
||
|
首先下面是我的JGR的审稿状态： Stage Start Date Decision Made; E-mail Confirmation Sent 2014-02-11 10:54:04 With Editor for Decision 2014-02-11 02:42:29 Decision Made; E-mail Confirmation Sent 2014-02-11 02:42:29 With Editor for Decision 2014-02-09 19:15:17 Under Review 2014-01-10 01:56:49 Contacting Potential Reviewers 2014-01-09 03:51:58 Waiting for Reviewer Assignment 2014-01-06 13:08:33 Initial Quality Control Complete 2014-01-06 13:08:33 Initial Quality Control Started 2014-01-03 01:01:56 Author Approved Converted Files 2014-01-03 01:01:55 Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 2014-01-02 02:29:18 我很郁闷JGR为什么没有说大修，小修，拒稿？我投IEEE起码状态会很明确说是大修，但是编辑给我的审稿意见是修改后重投： Dear Dr.XX: Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics. I have now received 2 reviews of your manuscript. I am sorry to inform you that based on the reviews of your manuscript which make several very substantial comments, I have decided to decline it for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics at this time. While the manuscript is not acceptable now, with additional work, as outlined in the comments, I believe that you will be able to turn this into a more suitable paper. I am rejecting it now so as not to put a time constraint on your revision and allow you ample time to complete the additional work. Once the revisions are complete, I would like to encourage you to resubmit the paper. If you resubmit this paper, please note that you will need to send a point-by-point response to all reviewer remarks. Your revised manuscript will be treated as a new submission. Sincerely, Alan Rodger Editor Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reviewer #1 (Comments to Author): This manuscript demonstrates a tri-band technique to estimate TEC maps from spaceborne SAR images, which is potentially of interest to the wide InSAR community as well as the space weather community. I have two major concerns about this paper: (1) the sensitivity of the tri-band technique has not been fully analysed; (2) no actual data has been employed to demonstrate the feasibility of the technique. In addition, English could be easily improved. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer #2 (Comments to Author): The paper is about retrieval of XXX. Although the work in the manuscript may bear some merit, the authors did not do a good job in explaining their contribution properly. XXXXXXXX In my opinion, the paper should be returned to the authors for major revision. They should be able to demonstrate the merit in their proposed technique and provide proper comparisons with the existing studies in the literature. 请问一下，JGR是否没有大修的选项？？大修都是修改后重投吗？我好想昨天看一个虫友上传的JGR-SOLID EARTH 的评审流程稿是： 1) Recommendation (check one) __ (a) Publish in present form __ (b) Publish with minor changes made by author __ (c) Manuscript revisions are sufficient for an Editor to evaluate. Publish after Editor’s approval __ (d) Return to author for major revisions. Invite the author to resubmit for a second review. Would you be willing to review the revised manuscript ? Yes___ No___ __ (e) Reject 我看大修就是重投，但是我是JGR-space,上面是JGR-SOLID EARTH ，我不清楚是否都一样？》 请大神帮我看看我的评审意见怎么样？？还有就是改后重头相当于JGR的大修吗？？ 多谢！ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐
 JGR 投稿话题 |
» 猜你喜欢
事业单位还是大学好？
已经有15人回复
-
没.赶.上.今.年.博.士.的.同.学.看.过.来.
已经有8人回复
-
申请24博士 材料/化工/环境
已经有3人回复
-
小孩7岁，上一年级，不自信，学习较差
已经有29人回复
-
投稿求助
已经有5人回复
-
估计今年青基又没戏
已经有7人回复
-
下雨了
已经有18人回复
-
国家重点研发计划论文可以发MDPI里的期刊吗
已经有3人回复
-
最近遇到这样一个问题
已经有5人回复
-
一审一个审稿人，小修，会怎么样呀？
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 昨天收到的AWPL的审稿意见，小弟有些困惑还请大神指点
已经有27人回复
- 大神帮忙看看这审稿状态啥意思？
已经有10人回复
- 大神帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思？
已经有8人回复
- 【求大神帮忙】功能陶瓷类论文投稿 求大神推荐审稿超级快的期刊 万分感谢！
已经有9人回复
- 审稿意见回来了 有些理解不是很透彻啊 求各位大神帮忙看看是什么意思啊？？？
已经有20人回复
- 求助大神，想请教哪些sci,ei期刊的审稿周期快。。。
已经有3人回复
7楼2014-02-12 19:42:52
25