查看: 2792  |  回复: 8
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者solskjaer300将赠送您 50 个金币

solskjaer300

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求助,有大神投过GJR吗?我的审稿意见请大神看看,有疑问已有2人参与

首先下面是我的JGR的审稿状态:
Stage        Start Date
Decision Made; E-mail Confirmation Sent        2014-02-11 10:54:04
With Editor for Decision        2014-02-11 02:42:29
Decision Made; E-mail Confirmation Sent        2014-02-11 02:42:29
With Editor for Decision        2014-02-09 19:15:17
Under Review        2014-01-10 01:56:49
Contacting Potential Reviewers        2014-01-09 03:51:58
Waiting for Reviewer Assignment        2014-01-06 13:08:33
Initial Quality Control Complete        2014-01-06 13:08:33
Initial Quality Control Started        2014-01-03 01:01:56
Author Approved Converted Files        2014-01-03 01:01:55
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted        2014-01-02 02:29:18
我很郁闷JGR为什么没有说大修,小修,拒稿?我投IEEE起码状态会很明确说是大修,但是编辑给我的审稿意见是修改后重投:
Dear Dr.XX:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics. I have now received 2 reviews of your manuscript.

I am sorry to inform you that based on the reviews of your manuscript which make several very substantial comments, I have decided to decline it for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics at this time. While the manuscript is not acceptable now, with additional work, as outlined in the comments, I believe that you will be able to turn this into a more suitable paper. I am rejecting it now so as not to put a time constraint on your revision and allow you ample time to complete the additional work. Once the revisions are complete, I would like to encourage you to resubmit the paper.


If you resubmit this paper, please note that you will need to send a point-by-point response to all reviewer remarks. Your revised manuscript will be treated as a new submission.

Sincerely,

Alan Rodger
Editor
Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reviewer #1 (Comments to Author):

This manuscript demonstrates a tri-band technique to estimate TEC maps from spaceborne SAR images, which is potentially of interest to the wide InSAR community as well as the space weather community.

I have two major concerns about this paper:
(1) the sensitivity of the tri-band technique has not been fully analysed;
(2) no actual data has been employed to demonstrate the feasibility of the technique.

In addition, English could be easily improved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reviewer #2 (Comments to Author):

The paper is about retrieval of XXX. Although the work in the manuscript may bear some merit, the authors did not do a good job in explaining their contribution properly.
XXXXXXXX
In my opinion, the paper should be returned to the authors for major revision. They should be able to demonstrate the merit in their proposed technique and provide proper comparisons with the existing studies in the literature.
请问一下,JGR是否没有大修的选项??大修都是修改后重投吗?我好想昨天看一个虫友上传的JGR-SOLID EARTH 的评审流程稿是:
1) Recommendation (check one)  __
(a) Publish in present form  __
(b) Publish with minor changes made by author  __
(c) Manuscript revisions are sufficient for an Editor to evaluate. Publish after  Editor’s approval  __
(d) Return to author for major revisions. Invite the author to resubmit for a  second review.  Would you be willing to review the revised manuscript ? Yes___ No___  __ (e) Reject
我看大修就是重投,但是我是JGR-space,上面是JGR-SOLID EARTH ,我不清楚是否都一样?》
请大神帮我看看我的评审意见怎么样??还有就是改后重头相当于JGR的大修吗??
多谢!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ahnushikun

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
solskjaer300: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-07-23 10:48:37
JGR是有大修的。你这个是重投。好好修改吧。祝好运。
2楼2014-02-12 12:12:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

solskjaer300

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by ahnushikun at 2014-02-12 12:12:48
JGR是有大修的。你这个是重投。好好修改吧。祝好运。

但为什么JGR-SOLID EARTH 的评审流程稿是这个呢??多谢!
1) Recommendation (check one)  __
(a) Publish in present form  __
(b) Publish with minor changes made by author  __
(c) Manuscript revisions are sufficient for an Editor to evaluate. Publish after  Editor’s approval  __
(d) Return to author for major revisions. Invite the author to resubmit for a  second review.  Would you be willing to review the revised manuscript ? Yes___ No___  __ (e) Reject
3楼2014-02-12 12:21:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ahnushikun

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by solskjaer300 at 2014-02-12 12:21:18
但为什么JGR-SOLID EARTH 的评审流程稿是这个呢??多谢!
1) Recommendation (check one)  __
(a) Publish in present form  __
(b) Publish with minor changes made by author  __
(c) Manuscript revisi ...

仅仅是个流程而已,主编会根据审稿意见再做具体的决定。主编的意见已经写的相当清楚。何必纠结于大修或者重投呢,都得修改,都得认真的修改认真的回复,不然都有可能被拒的。
4楼2014-02-12 12:23:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wjz3619905

金虫 (小有名气)

其实就是没有时间限制的大修改!这个期刊比较牛逼!祝你好运!
5楼2014-02-12 12:46:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

solskjaer300

新虫 (小有名气)

6楼2014-02-12 19:37:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

寻找cock

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
编辑已经明确说了你的文章是被拒稿了,让你按照审稿人的意见完成相关后续工作再投
7楼2014-02-12 19:42:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cngisworld

木虫 (初入文坛)

今天刚听了IJRS编辑的讲座,正好回答你的问题。你的评审意见应该是“拒稿&再投”,虽然不如“小修”和“大修”,但是已经不错了,大门没有关闭,机会很大,好好根据评审意见修改!按编辑讲,是投稿期盼的三个结果(小修,大修,拒稿&再投)之一。
8楼2014-06-13 17:16:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuzhiyuyan

木虫 (著名写手)

楼主,我也遇到同样的问题,楼主文章最后重投接收了吗?

发自小木虫IOS客户端
千里之行始于足下
9楼2017-06-28 12:36:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 solskjaer300 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[博后之家] 年薪60万 延安大学“延河学者·特聘教授”引进计划 +20 ghjghk5 2022-06-30 20/1000 2022-07-05 23:23 by 七叶漂漂
[论文投稿] 润色 +9 明月清风糖 2022-07-01 16/800 2022-07-05 23:00 by chao128373
[高分子] KH560改性凹凸棒石 +3 昕希希希希 2022-07-02 11/550 2022-07-05 21:24 by 昕希希希希
[职场人生] 真的是苍蝇不盯无缝的蛋 +7 新材料 2022-07-02 9/450 2022-07-05 16:51 by wsx_wsy
[论文投稿] IEEE TBD 垃圾期刊 CNM +7 jb2849 2022-07-05 14/700 2022-07-05 12:48 by wangzhenyft
[基金申请] 系统今天有变化,医学口 +23 lj836791773 2022-06-30 52/2600 2022-07-05 10:32 by lj836791773
[论文投稿] under review 45天还没找到审稿人正常吗? +12 20食品 2022-07-04 21/1050 2022-07-05 09:25 by absu
[教师之家] 注意,法律支持服务期满前离职不必全额退还房补 +5 phy1 2022-07-04 18/900 2022-07-05 09:21 by 大大的世界
[职场人生] 工作选择求助专家 +4 babyblue3562 2022-07-01 5/250 2022-07-05 08:42 by 小-兔崽
[找工作] 特聘副研,本单位是第二单位,对考核有用吗 +3 SCU2016 2022-07-05 3/150 2022-07-05 08:10 by 3611
[基金申请] 国家社科基金艺术类听说通讯评审开始了 +3 wffh0000 2022-07-03 3/150 2022-07-04 21:52 by 25536251
[论文投稿] ACS AMI 20+3 DDDDD小白 2022-06-29 10/500 2022-07-04 17:18 by DDDDD小白
[基金申请] 每日一问:博后站中特助今天出结果吗1? +11 流年易辰 2022-07-04 19/950 2022-07-04 15:20 by gavinliu2003
[考博] 本211,硕中科院,cv方向,考博建议 10+3 zsq_UCAS 2022-07-02 13/650 2022-07-04 12:23 by sanbing123
[硕博家园] 用心做的东西,被批的一无是处 +13 王白点i 2022-07-02 14/700 2022-07-04 10:41 by pennchem
[基金申请] 何谓“三无人员”? +13 alvin_zw 2022-06-30 15/750 2022-07-04 10:27 by wolfgangHugh
[硕博家园] 注孤 +11 子非也 2022-07-03 22/1100 2022-07-04 08:00 by ykh144521
[基金申请] 生命科学部2022年度国家优青和基础科学中心项目会议评审专家公布 +5 wangkd 2022-07-01 6/300 2022-07-02 17:17 by LNP@mRNA
[硕博家园] 无题 +3 蓝色风 2022-07-01 3/150 2022-07-01 10:19 by LU1314To99
[基金申请] 会评时间 +4 xmccnmmmm 2022-06-30 4/200 2022-06-30 22:52 by 冰水涟漪
信息提示
请填处理意见