查看: 6100  |  回复: 122
本帖产生 1 个 SEPI ,点击这里进行查看

m0378

木虫 (职业作家)


m0378: 回帖置顶 2013-07-23 14:58:42
投了一篇SCI的专刊,返回了一个审稿人意见,建议reject,是不是挂了[/color=brown]


多数期刊是一票否决制的,LZ九死一生了。

[ Last edited by m0378 on 2013-7-23 at 15:02 ]
51楼2013-07-23 14:57:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wwj123ok

木虫 (正式写手)


★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
m0378: 金币+1, 谢谢参与 2013-07-23 15:56:10
投稿三个月了,无任何消息的有没有
52楼2013-07-23 15:47:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

m0378

木虫 (职业作家)


引用回帖:
52楼: Originally posted by wwj123ok at 2013-07-23 15:47:51
投稿三个月了,无任何消息的有没有

不急,等等就有了
53楼2013-07-23 15:55:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wei08smmu

金虫 (正式写手)


★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
m0378: 回帖置顶 2013-07-24 09:21:56
m0378: 金币+3, 你好像已经拿了7个了,但金币总数不让超过10个,没办法只能给3个了 2013-07-24 09:23:53
avast2009: 金币+10, 鼓励分享原创经历 2013-07-24 10:20:14
呜呜~~原来直接收的还是少数,之前真的是碰上狗屎运了,今天收的一个1.9几分的杂志五个审稿人的意见,我快哭了,把编辑给的信贴给大家吧。是个major revision。我去努力修改文章了,之后会补发该文的命运的~
Dear Author,

Manuscript ID XXX entitled "XXX" has been reviewed.  The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter.

The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some revisions to your manuscript.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.

You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of the manuscript.  Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.  Please also highlight the changes to your manuscript within the document by using bold or colored text  (please do not leave track changes on though as this can make the manuscript difficult to read).

Please do not sign or include any author-identifying information on your 'response to reviewers'. In the event that your manuscript goes out for re-review, reviewers will be able to see this.

Once the revised manuscript is prepared, you can upload it and submit it through your Author Center.

When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided.  You can use this space to document any changes you make to the original manuscript.  In order to expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please  be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s).  Please remember not to sign your response as it will be sent to the reviewer to help them assess if you have addressed their concerns.

IMPORTANT:  Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript.  Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Autism, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to our journal and I look forward to receiving your revision.
54楼2013-07-24 00:33:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

秋天001

新虫 (初入文坛)


★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
m0378: 金币+2, 谢谢分享 2013-07-24 09:22:54
avast2009: 金币+3, 鼓励分享原创经历 2013-07-24 10:20:35
引用回帖:
32楼: Originally posted by 秋天001 at 2013-07-21 20:04:59
第一次投,复审意见,正在修改中,来学习一下,以后再谈经验

刚被录用了,菜鸟来这里谢谢大家,作为新手,小木虫给了我很大的帮助。  投的是小微,不能和大牛比呀。
复审的修改时,按老板的指导,一定要按专家的意见,每一条给出明确的明确的修改或者答复。我的有一条修改意见,其实里面包含了好几个小意见,要分别给出修改或答复,并且在修改说明里面分开说明。
可能这个有效果。以后继续想大家学习。
56楼2013-07-24 09:17:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Belinda123_1

铁虫 (小有名气)


★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
m0378: 金币+1, 欢迎常来 2013-07-24 10:17:18
楼主啊,其实投了论文自后还是要按照审稿意见来修改的,没得办法,毕竟人家占主动权嘛,只要将不符合要求的修改好了,那么编辑就没意见了!加油!
57楼2013-07-24 10:01:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

m0378

木虫 (职业作家)


★ ★ ★ ★ ★
m0378: 回帖置顶 2013-07-25 14:49:28
avast2009: 金币+5, 鼓励分享原创经历 2013-07-25 16:31:40

Dear Prof. XXX,
Ref. Ms. Ref. No.:  XXX
Sorry for this unsolicited email. I wish this email finds you are doing very well! We are a research team in XXX, and submitted the above-captioned article to XXX in last Oct for your consideration. Half year having elapsing, I am thereby writing to you today regarding the review progress.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Many thanks and all the best!
Name: ×××
E-mail: ××××@××××
59楼2013-07-25 14:49:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

一生好运

木虫 (正式写手)


★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
送红花一朵
m0378: 金币+10, 谢谢参与 2013-08-10 08:42:59
楼主辛苦了,真是急人之所急,想人之所想,创建了如此之妙的版块供大家学习交流分享自己的投稿心得及迷惑之处,恭祝版主,望再接再厉,再创神帖!
63楼2013-08-10 08:33:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

joe9731

银虫 (正式写手)


★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
m0378: 金币+1, 谢谢参与 2013-08-13 13:05:15
小白路过纯学习的
64楼2013-08-12 10:47:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mahongan

新虫 (小有名气)


★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
m0378: 金币+1, 谢谢参与,文章中了,就来分享经验,呵呵 2013-08-13 13:04:52
谢谢楼主,学到不少东西!
这个帖子很好啊.
我也准备写文章呢,呵呵呵
65楼2013-08-13 10:41:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yyshpy007

禁虫 (正式写手)

本帖内容被屏蔽

67楼2013-08-21 22:43:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wei08smmu

金虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
54楼: Originally posted by wei08smmu at 2013-07-24 00:33:41
呜呜~~原来直接收的还是少数,之前真的是碰上狗屎运了,今天收的一个1.9几分的杂志五个审稿人的意见,我快哭了,把编辑给的信贴给大家吧。是个major revision。我去努力修改文章了,之后会补发该文的命运的~
Dear  ...

该文章经历大修后小修,现已被接受~
69楼2013-10-10 16:56:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hxfenghxfeng

铜虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
大牛:

审稿人的意见比较笼统,只是说哪一段不太清楚  怎么回答?
70楼2014-02-08 10:05:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jwc811zjy

金虫 (初入文坛)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
第一次投稿,正在审稿中没有经验,多向大家学习。而且,博士六年很急的,祝福这篇能接收,否则毕不了业。以后如果有回复再请教各位。

发自手机版WAP
71楼2014-02-08 17:23:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

南极的问候

金虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
,一篇EI收费多少呢
72楼2014-03-25 07:57:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

m0378

木虫 (职业作家)


引用回帖:
72楼: Originally posted by 南极的问候 at 2014-03-25 07:57:41
,一篇EI收费多少呢

收钱么?
73楼2014-03-25 08:34:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

selen32

银虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
进来为楼主这个帖子点个赞!!!
74楼2014-04-30 09:20:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yq09

金虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
多谢楼主的活动啊

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
75楼2014-05-30 00:48:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wj_2080

新虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
We received your paper. It will be reviewed. For any information regarding the submitted paper…………是不是表示文章会被送审?
76楼2014-06-01 22:22:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljxnuaa

银虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
哎,第一篇文章还在煎熬中。。。有审稿意见一定会贴出来
77楼2014-07-17 14:43:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

独孤694

至尊木虫 (知名作家)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
一个2点多的期刊,两个审稿人,第一个4条意见,很好回答,第二个十多条意见,有几条很棘手,其中一条的意思是重新计算(我做的是模拟),假如按他说的来,相当于把自己工作都推翻了,最后合理的解释,说明我那样做的理由,其他问题尽量按着审稿人的意愿来回答,二审只有修改英语这一条意见了。总体来看,尽量按审稿人的意见来修改,感觉他说的有问题,只要你理由充分,一般都能接受,不会故意刁难你的。
79楼2014-08-19 16:06:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

myrice112

铜虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
一篇jacs刚被reject,还没收到老板的审稿邮件。

发自手机版WAP
80楼2014-10-07 08:11:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cherrynana

金虫 (小有名气)


先Mark 一下
82楼2014-12-02 22:18:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

不倦

木虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
11月30号才投了一篇,都三天了,状态还是在“Submitted to Editorial Office”。
83楼2014-12-03 14:38:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

warkan

金虫 (正式写手)


好贴,支持
85楼2015-04-13 21:58:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhxh1997

木虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
54楼: Originally posted by wei08smmu at 2013-07-24 00:33:41
呜呜~~原来直接收的还是少数,之前真的是碰上狗屎运了,今天收的一个1.9几分的杂志五个审稿人的意见,我快哭了,把编辑给的信贴给大家吧。是个major revision。我去努力修改文章了,之后会补发该文的命运的~
Dear  ...

楼主你收到的信怎么和我收到的一样啊。那主编用满地球一样的模板啊!
我一稿和二稿是用Latex写的转换为PDF的东西,最后居然让我用Word写。我费了很多时间用Word编辑,把改动处标红。投过去之后,又说稿件一稿二稿形式不一样,要求用与原来一样的形式。那为什么信中让我用Word呢!也怪我有疑问时没有跟他们确认一下,是一个教训。

后话:目前文章已经接收,大概7月份刊出。
祝你好运!
86楼2015-04-14 17:04:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

误解1990

木虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
攒rp..
1、我感觉态度是最重要的,一定要审稿人看到你乐意提高的诚恳态度。发扬审稿人虐我千百遍,我待审稿人如初恋的精神。态度一定要好。要感谢,不要介意谢谢说的多。。
2、一个稿子应该是主编、审稿人和作者共同努力,来为community的readers服务的。所以认真提高,至少从作者的角度来说,大多数的审稿意见是有助于improve的。所以,大多数情况下,你刚开始觉得不好改,但是仔细想想其实很多意见的确说的很有道理,如果你能据此修改,那么你的稿子只会更solid。。。
3、事实最痛苦的是,有些修改比较难,比如要你补充数据或者讨论,这的确不是一个简单的事情。我感觉要尽力,甚至在回复中可以和编辑或者审稿人讨论,也就是说让其先看看你补充到这个程度,如何了,如果他觉得不好,他会让你再改的。当然,如果你的精神已然在这个时候感动了他,那么你就过去了。如果没有,那么继续,相信大多数的人不会那么深挖到底的,一来一回两个来回,你的提高是一方面,而你的努力审稿人是看的清楚的。我不认为情况会越来越遭的,如果你这么做下去。
4、事实上,初稿很重要,很多时候,初稿的水平基本决定了它能发在什么档次的期刊上。认真准备好solid的初稿,对于你减轻修改过程的压力是不可或缺的。
5、审稿人的立场基本上决定了你的稿子的接受与否。

。。。完全自己手写。。。。
87楼2015-06-04 13:10:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

卢勇卢灵

新虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我投的国外第一篇SCI,一天直接录用,不做任何修改,自我恭喜吧!
88楼2015-06-05 04:06:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mofashishe

铜虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
投稿一个生物学二区X.XX的期刊,reviewer一个据(提了数个要修改的地方)一个小修,最后编辑给了据&重投。。。。。大修了将近三个月,6月底的时候重新投出去了,现在在等结果

Dear Dr XXX,

Thank you for your recent submission to XXX.  Your manuscript has been reviewed by two scientists familiar with AAAAA.  I have appended their comments below.  The reviewers dug into the work you presented and have a number of queries and suggestions, but in the final analysis neither reviewer feels that the manuscript you have submitted represents a sufficiently analyzed study to warrant publication in XXXXX. This is an interesting piece or work but somehow preliminary. Several additional experiments and controls should be conducted to support your conclusions (e.g., XXXXX ...).

Although I appreciate the potential of the study, on balance, I must regrettably reject your paper.  I feel that there are too many critical experiments missing in this paper to merit publication in New Phytologist.  I am sorry that I cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. I hope that the reviewers' comments may be of use to you as you prepare the manuscript for a re-submission to New Phytologist.

XXXXX


回答基本就是按照reviewer1(据稿那个)的意见来修改啦,99%都按照他的意思来改了,就是有一个实验没办法补。。。。。,

期望会有好结果吧。
89楼2015-07-28 15:44:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhanhuang311

金虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
好活动,我也分享下我的:

Independent reviews of your manuscript have now been received, which indicated that is not acceptable for publication in its present form. Please carefully review the referee's comments (included below). I truly invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript by making suitably address and substantial modifications. A Response Letter is highly recommended for the issues raised in the comments.

Reviewer #1: This is a well written manuscript. The experimental evidences and the mechanisms behind them, namely XXXXXXXX. The work is of interest of the journal's general readership. The manuscript can be accepted for publication.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript provides a novel method to improve XXXXXX. Unfortunately, however, the manuscript is not appropriate for publication in its current form. The authors have omitted some technical details from the manuscript and have left some important questions unanswered. With some major revisions, this manuscript should be resubmitted and reconsidered for publication. Specific issues with this manuscript will be listed below.
90楼2015-07-28 17:37:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yccas2010

木虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
很好的帖子,顶楼主一下。顺便请教楼主一下,对于没有回避审稿人的期刊,如何友善的提醒不要送给方向冲突的某个人审稿?我遇到过这样的审稿人,因为我们做的工作很类似,直接给我的审稿意见是没有任何创新,没有任何意义。我知道审稿人的意见只是编辑做决断的参考,但是这样的负面意见影响实在是太大
91楼2015-08-12 20:32:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunnyboy555

至尊木虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
录了一篇,要交版面费,USD1250, 不想交,偏贵而且麻烦,能否不出纸质版啊,影响检索否???
92楼2015-08-12 21:37:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vincent_hpax

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
顶下楼主 我的文章大修且改为SCO已经返回 正在under review, 大概意见如下:

Dear*************
93楼2015-08-12 21:53:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mokedeng

铜虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
怎么都是英文的…没有中文的呀~看不懂~艾玛

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
94楼2015-08-14 10:27:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

功夫熊猫zjl

新虫 (小有名气)


★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
m0378: 金币+5 2015-08-15 21:36:47
从我的第一篇SCI投稿开始,基本上每天都会把论文投稿交流版块的帖子看一遍,从中学到很多。从投稿到论文接收,整整三个月的时间,期间也是经历了各种煎熬,而且文章属于大修(一审两个审稿人,其中一个拒稿,二审拒稿的审稿人推荐接收)——小修——接收。大修足足花了28天,拖到了最后一天(没有补试验),最后打动了开始拒稿的那个审稿人,推荐接收。
把自己的经历写下来,希望对虫子们有些帮助。

杂志基本信息:

Journal of Nutrition, 2015IF: 3.875; 2014IF:4.227;医学营养分类下二区期刊。

一审意见:
Dear Dr.,

I have received feedback from the experts who were selected to review the manuscript you submitted to The Journal of Nutrition.  Whether the paper can be accepted for publication cannot be determined at this time.  The reviewers think you’re your manuscript contains interesting and potentially important data, but they are concerned about a number of general and specific points described in their reviews and outlined in my comments below. Reviewer comments in text format are given below.
If a reviewer or the Assistant Editor has uploaded formatted comments, such as a checklist or marked pages of your manuscript, you can download the formatted comments from your Author Area at http://submit.nutrition.org.

One editorial board member considers that your proteomic results were too descriptive and preliminary, and *** was too high to make any physiological and practical implications. The other reviewer has concerns over the data availability, statistical analysis, and Western blot analysis quality. The Assistant Editor has a series of format and presentation questions.

Please be aware that revising the manuscript does not guarantee acceptance and it will undergo further review.  If you decide to submit a revised paper, please do so within 28 days.  After you have revised, please use the yellow highlighter tool in Word to mark the major changes you made in light of the peer reviews, my comments, and the comments of the assistant editor.  In the "Response to Reviews" field in your Author Area, provide a point-by-point response, listing by line number of the revised version the major changes made as well as those that could not be highlighted, such as deleted sections, and explain why any suggestions made by reviewers or editors were not incorporated into your revised paper.

See Instructions for Authors for details concerning the submission of revisions; requirements differ substantially from those for initial submissions.  Note that the formatting requirements pointed out by the assistant editor that are not made prior to acceptance, and thus must be handled by the journal's copy editor, may incur charges that will be billed to authors.
Please inform me by e-mail of your anticipated submission date if you cannot revise the paper within 28 days.  Revised manuscripts that are not received within 4 months will be considered new submissions with new receipt dates and they may be sent to new reviewers. Therefore, I encourage you to make the required changes as quickly as possible.

Thank you for considering The Journal of Nutrition for review and publication of your manuscript.  

Reviewer 1 ...
The manuscript entitled “***” by *** et al has been reviewed. The paper demonstrates t***.  The paper should be of interest to the readership, however there are some problems with statistics that need to be addressed and the raw proteomic data should be deposited in a databank so that all of the proteins detected can be studied by others later, including proteins detected but not affected by the intervention which could be important information to some of the readers.

MAJOR
1) …..
2) ……
3) ………
4)……
MINOR
1) …..
2)……..
3) …….
4) …….
5) ……
6) …….
总结来说就是第一个审稿人认为文章包含有用的信息,但是有一些问题需要修改,提了几点大的意见和一些小的意见。
Reviewer 2 ...
*** were supplemented with or without ***. Overall, the study was straight-forward. But because the first portion of results were not novel, and the proteomic results were too descriptive and preliminary, the study does not worth a publication in JN, but rather more suitable for a specialized journal in animal science. There are a few other minor points: 1) *** 2) ***. 3) ***
第二个审稿人意见不多,但是确实致命性的,认为文章第一部分的发现不是原创的,创新性不够;对蛋白组的处理过于初步和描述性,认为不足以在该杂志发表,推荐投到更专业的杂志。
副主编根据审稿人的意见给了28天时间大修,开始看到审稿意见喜忧参半,不过很快就投入到浩大的修改工程当中,说是浩大一点都不为过,第一个审稿人提的数据分析的问题请教了很多专家,虽然最后证明我们的数据分析并没有错,不过弄明白了为什么审稿人会以为我们的分析方法不对,跟他解释清楚了,二审的时候该审稿人就没有审核意见了。
我很清楚,能否搞定第二个审稿人成为文章能否接受的关键,因此针对第二个审稿人的每一问题都进行了非常认真的回复和修改,Response17页,5000多字,针对第二个审稿人的回复占了2/3。针对他提的创新性的问题,我们进行了很有逻辑的回复,对于他的其他的小问题在文章都做了修改。最后一天提交修改稿,2周后收到二审意见,开始拒稿的审稿人的意见:Investigators made great efforts in addressing my first review. I now recommend to accept the manuscript. However, a few minor changes should be considered. 被我们的努力和真诚感动了,还有一点我感觉他一审的时候对我们的文章结论过于草率了。二审的时候编辑又找了第三审稿人仲裁,第三个审稿人提了2个小问题。因此,二审给了小修。后面就是顺利接受了。

总结几点:
1.无论文章接收与否,每次审稿人的意见对提高文章的质量都非常大,所以要放好心态,努力去根据审稿人的疑问来改善文章,只要你的文章达到足够好的水平,接收只是水到渠成的事。
2.大修就是编辑已经潜在觉得你的文章很有发表的价值,所以一定要抓住机会,针对审稿意见尽最大努力去做修改,把文章改到一个起码自己满意的水平。
3.对审稿人尽量客气礼貌去回复,无论国内外审稿人都是有感情的,你的努力审稿人都感觉的到,会被打动而完全转变态度。

最后祝福所有人的文章都能有一个顺利、美满的结局!
95楼2015-08-14 22:19:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

heye0601

新虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by wsh912 at 2013-07-20 12:39:01
给的是major revision,然后修改了几天,拖了几天,10天左右提交,2天后接收

QQ截图20130720123532.png

大修后不用再返回给专家再审么?

发自小木虫IOS客户端
97楼2015-11-15 08:47:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wsh912

金虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
97楼: Originally posted by heye0601 at 2015-11-15 08:47:48
大修后不用再返回给专家再审么?
...

也不一定,看期刊看主编了,我的其实没有啥很大的问题要改

发自手机版WAP
98楼2015-11-15 10:45:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

blackpenxmc

金虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by m0378 at 2013-07-20 12:05:45
我先来抛下砖,来引你的玉:晒下自己收到的第一个审稿意见(拒稿):
Dear ****,

Reviewers' comments on your paper referenced above have now been received.  You will see that they advise against publi ...

请问你找的润色公司是哪家呢?靠谱吗?能推荐一个靠谱的润色公司吗?

发自小木虫Android客户端
99楼2015-12-08 09:18:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2013-07-24 01:29   回复  
avast200958楼
2013-07-25 13:13   回复  
mahongan60楼
2013-07-25 16:06   回复  
祝福!
Justin14761楼
2013-07-25 16:08   回复  
xhmaohan62楼
2013-07-25 16:13   回复  
祝福祝福
yyshpy00766楼
2013-08-21 22:41   回复  
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
m0378: 金币+3, 很好的分享,谢谢参与 2013-08-21 22:42:39
[ Last edited by yyshpy007 on 2013-8-25 at 11:03 ]
yyshpy00768楼
2013-08-21 22:47   回复  
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
祝福! [ Last edited by yyshpy007 on 2013-8-25 at 11:04 ]
janetlee78楼
2014-08-19 09:21   回复  
liuchaoqun81楼
2014-11-12 10:47   回复  
ncyinghan84楼
2014-12-04 23:46   回复  
96112696楼
2015-08-27 15:56   回复  
lansefei2015100楼
2016-02-03 18:45   回复  
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 m0378 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[外语学习] PETS5资料 +22 lafar 2019-08-20 23/1150 2019-08-26 02:10 by yuwang911
[基金申请] 是时候取消面地青项目了 +6 daicy527 2019-08-25 6/300 2019-08-26 00:09 by findplny
[论文投稿] 替学霸师弟招生[控制/信息处理/人工智能] +6 舒天朝辉 2019-08-25 6/300 2019-08-25 22:06 by 15538131729
[论文投稿] 期刊论文怎么查重 +4 345007685 2019-08-24 5/250 2019-08-25 08:31 by 小龙虾子
[基金申请] 同事的本子,看不明白是不是ABB,ABC,还是BBB,请虫友们帮忙分析一下评审意见,谢谢 +9 343810898 2019-08-24 9/450 2019-08-25 00:18 by tjuzhuzhiwen
[教师之家] 麻烦大家给点建议呗? +19 kk7098616 2019-08-23 44/2200 2019-08-24 22:06 by kk7098616
[考博] 考博or工作 +16 千寻的回忆 2019-08-23 20/1000 2019-08-24 19:19 by cao1118
[找工作] 青岛生物医药行业找工作 +6 DS小汤圆儿 2019-08-22 14/700 2019-08-23 15:31 by fengyi2014
[论文投稿] 请问下大家平时所说的几区,指的是中科院还是JCR? +4 wanshicheng 2019-08-23 5/250 2019-08-23 10:31 by yuwang911
[基金申请] 《计划书》中的预算部分可以做多大程度的修改? 5+4 Bugz 2019-08-21 16/800 2019-08-23 09:00 by ci_huster
[硕博家园] 有没有人从小被某些话、某些事伤害到今天哪怕是读到博士仍然自卑 +22 冷粙柚柚 2019-08-22 49/2450 2019-08-23 07:28 by luoyongqing
[药学] 毕业后都是怎么发paper啊 +3 红枫叶 2019-08-21 5/250 2019-08-21 22:09 by maojiashun
[硕博家园] 成年人的烦恼 +19 Lisens 2019-08-19 28/1400 2019-08-21 13:43 by lengzhihua
[基金申请] 吐槽一下学校和省基金 +34 fkf5277 2019-08-20 50/2500 2019-08-21 12:07 by tm4432
[有机交流] 四氢呋喃用氢化钠这样干燥行吗? +4 jiqiang 2019-08-20 11/550 2019-08-21 11:35 by jiqiang
[基金申请] 有些迷糊,间接费,直接费,批准费 +6 babu2015 2019-08-20 7/350 2019-08-20 20:46 by huwanpeng2
[硕博家园] 在清华读博士的感受 +8 dlofcauc 2019-08-19 9/450 2019-08-20 13:17 by 小小小青虫
[找工作] 党校不适合博士,博士不适合党校 +5 link2046 2019-08-19 5/250 2019-08-20 01:07 by 刘小嵩321
[硕博家园] 保研微电子,老师想给我安排偏软件的算法方向 +3 kaluote24 2019-08-19 4/200 2019-08-19 22:59 by kaluote24
[论文投稿] carbon期刊定位如何 +7 NatS168 2019-08-19 10/500 2019-08-19 19:59 by ncomm
信息提示
请填处理意见