| 查看: 1481 | 回复: 5 | |||
白衣铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
天山行旅
|
[交流]
文章杯具，教训供参考已有5人参与
|
|
投欧陶10天杯具。 贴出来审稿意见供大家赏析和引以为戒。 拒稿原因仅仅因为欧陶将限制粉体材料的相关稿件（尽管以前是收的）  。看来运气不佳啊。做粉体再投欧陶的虫友要考虑了。 不抛弃，不放弃。继续找个材料类杂志投。 Review: The paper describes a relatively simple route for making BiFeO3 powders. This appears promising but in the current context of high submission rates we regret that we are unable to accept papers reporting the production of powders without either demonstrations that the powders are viable precursors to dense ceramics, this being the main interest of the Journal, or some other aspect of the powder relevant to bulk ceramics. The current submission is a good paper about the production of a powder but the focus of the Journal is mainly on the subsequent stages of consolidation, sintering, microstructure etc. The current submission might be more suitable for a physical or inorganic chemistry journal. Although this Journal has accepted papers on powders in the past, the submission rate has more than doubles in the last few years and this has forced us to narrow the scope of the Journal. Of course, the methodology used is entirely appropriate to the aims of the investigation and no criticism is implied. It does, however, position the paper outside the main area of interest of the Journal. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
期末给学生划重点都是什么话术啊
已经有5人回复
-
想问一下有没有需要文章但是没时间带学生的研究生导师。
已经有20人回复
-
事业单位还是大学好？
已经有19人回复
-
发现督导在听课，需要跟TA招呼示意吗？有同学看手机、课件有疏漏算大问题吗？
已经有5人回复
-
前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然，现在基金委发来调查函
已经有11人回复
-
杭州国企和浙江高校如何选择？
已经有22人回复
-
小孩7岁，上一年级，不自信，学习较差
已经有36人回复
-
颜宁:基础研究应顶天立地,立地即从需求端作为问题的出发点,立项背景就是面向真实需求
已经有3人回复
-
催稿后秒拒
已经有6人回复
-
298求调剂
已经有9人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI文章和ABCD类文章是什么关系啊？谢谢
已经有6人回复
- 文章投稿
已经有15人回复
- 文章修改后如何回复审稿人
已经有9人回复
- 内容差不多的文章（中译英）若被不同期刊录用是否只能二选一？
已经有14人回复
- 理论加上实验的文章投sci什么期刊
已经有5人回复
- 内容为“导电聚苯胺电极的制备和应用”的中文文章，求推荐核心期刊
已经有11人回复
- science最新文章：MOF用做碳氢化合物的分离-Jeffrey R. Long
已经有110人回复
- 【求助】杯具，文章这样署名合理吗？
已经有53人回复
- 论文被杯具了，求助生物类审稿快的文章，等毕业
已经有13人回复
- 请教:文章杯具很多次,是不是说明文章本身问题很严重啊
已经有12人回复
- 文章投出去时间怎么长，还是没有消息！杯具！
已经有8人回复
- 杯具，文章没有送审就据了！
已经有46人回复
scelab
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
小木虫之有关部门负责人
- 应助: 63 (初中生)
- 贵宾: 1.475
- 金币: 8294.6
- 散金: 4158
- 红花: 39
- 沙发: 99
- 帖子: 21277
- 在线: 3169.2小时
- 虫号: 482065
- 注册: 2007-12-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境微生物学
- 管辖: 微生物
2楼2011-05-02 20:25:55
ilmeiyi
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1117.1
- 散金: 898
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 357
- 在线: 205.3小时
- 虫号: 1045877
- 注册: 2010-06-22
- 专业: 制造系统与自动化
3楼2011-05-02 21:30:49
4楼2011-05-02 22:00:50
ballack315629
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 706.4
- 散金: 593
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1193
- 在线: 9438.9小时
- 虫号: 524111
- 注册: 2008-03-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 粉末冶金
5楼2012-06-06 16:49:01
Nap栀子花开
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1089.4
- 散金: 40
- 帖子: 160
- 在线: 86.8小时
- 虫号: 2200295
- 注册: 2012-12-22
- 专业: 高分子助剂
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我的也悲剧了，也是做粉。 Review: The work is fine but in the current context of high submission rates it is regretted that the paper is too far from the Journal's focus on novel generic science concerning the relationships between processing, microstructure and properties of polycrystalline ceramics consolidated at high temperature and is therefore outside the scope of the Journal. The current submission is a good paper about the production of powders but the focus of the Journal is mainly on the subsequent stages of consolidation, sintering, microstructural development and properties of the pigments as used in the resulting bulk ceramics or glaze. Although the use of pigments in the glaze is demonstrated, there is no microstructural analysis to show the morphology of the particles in the glaze and their distribution, both at the microscale and the macroscale. Of course, the methodology used is entirely appropriate to the aims of the investigation and no criticism is implied. It does, however, position the paper outside the main area of interest of the Journal. |
6楼2018-07-08 21:27:27
10