|
[交流]
第一次投稿SCI收到的Decision Letter,另请教问题一个已有11人参与
Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Reject
Technically sound: N
New ideas: N
Just a variation of known device or technique: Y
Appropriate journal: Y
Proper context with related work: Y
Clear explanation: N
Adequate references: Y
Suitable title: Y
Adequate abstract: N
Significant numerical quantities: N
Clear figures with captions: N
Excessive text or figures: N
English satisfactory: N
Regular Article vs Note: N/A
Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Publish after revision
Technically sound: Y
New ideas: N/A
Just a variation of known device or technique: N/A
Appropriate journal: Y
Proper context with related work: Y
Clear explanation: Y
Adequate references: Y
Suitable title: Y
Adequate abstract: Y
Significant numerical quantities: Y
Clear figures with captions: Y
Excessive text or figures: Y
English satisfactory: N/A
Regular Article vs Note: Regular Article
Editor's Comments:
Although one referee recommended rejection, I agree with the second referee that your work has sufficient novelty and general interest to warrant publication after revision. Please respond to the comments of both referees since many of the points raised by the first referee are valid questions that many will ask as they read your manuscript.
You are required to upload one file for each figure cited in your paper in eps, ps, tiff or pdf file format only. If there are multiple parts to one figure, they must be combined into one file. You can only upload one file, per figure. DO NOT upload table files.
被第一个审稿人的评估意见打击的不行,不过第二个审稿人放了我一马,看来我还有点希望。
不过编辑的要求是每个插图上传一个文件,要求的格式出了pdf其他的都熟悉。不知道这里的兄弟们采用什么格式做的啊。
还有什么好的建议没有,这里先感谢大家了! |
» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
|