|
[½»Á÷]
µÚÒ»´ÎͶ¸åSCIÊÕµ½µÄDecision Letter£¬ÁíÇë½ÌÎÊÌâÒ»¸öÒÑÓÐ11È˲ÎÓë
Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Reject
Technically sound: N
New ideas: N
Just a variation of known device or technique: Y
Appropriate journal: Y
Proper context with related work: Y
Clear explanation: N
Adequate references: Y
Suitable title: Y
Adequate abstract: N
Significant numerical quantities: N
Clear figures with captions: N
Excessive text or figures: N
English satisfactory: N
Regular Article vs Note: N/A
Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Publish after revision
Technically sound: Y
New ideas: N/A
Just a variation of known device or technique: N/A
Appropriate journal: Y
Proper context with related work: Y
Clear explanation: Y
Adequate references: Y
Suitable title: Y
Adequate abstract: Y
Significant numerical quantities: Y
Clear figures with captions: Y
Excessive text or figures: Y
English satisfactory: N/A
Regular Article vs Note: Regular Article
Editor's Comments:
Although one referee recommended rejection, I agree with the second referee that your work has sufficient novelty and general interest to warrant publication after revision. Please respond to the comments of both referees since many of the points raised by the first referee are valid questions that many will ask as they read your manuscript.
You are required to upload one file for each figure cited in your paper in eps, ps, tiff or pdf file format only. If there are multiple parts to one figure, they must be combined into one file. You can only upload one file, per figure. DO NOT upload table files.
±»µÚÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÆÀ¹ÀÒâ¼û´ò»÷µÄ²»ÐУ¬²»¹ýµÚ¶þ¸öÉó¸åÈË·ÅÁËÎÒÒ»Âí£¬¿´À´ÎÒ»¹ÓеãÏ£Íû¡£
²»¹ý±à¼µÄÒªÇóÊÇÿ¸ö²åͼÉÏ´«Ò»¸öÎļþ£¬ÒªÇóµÄ¸ñʽ³öÁËpdfÆäËûµÄ¶¼ÊìϤ¡£²»ÖªµÀÕâÀïµÄÐÖµÜÃDzÉÓÃʲô¸ñʽ×öµÄ°¡¡£
»¹ÓÐʲôºÃµÄ½¨ÒéûÓУ¬ÕâÀïÏȸÐл´ó¼ÒÁË£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍƼö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
|