Originally posted by andrew82chen at 2010-06-07 16:05:14:
去fist solar上看了一下，老美在大力发展这个呢，如果害处那么大，老美应该不会那么傻吧

低成本,2009年就降到$0.87 per watt;
高产量,一个公司09年CdTe电池产量都到1228MW，而中国09年总产量才不过4382MW,
...

Because of low cadmium prices and U.S. battery manufacturers moving their operations to China and Mexico, the Big River Zinc Corporation in Sauget, Illinois, ceased production of cadmium in 2000. The company chose to dispose of its cadmium output, rather than refine it (Plachy 2002). Cadmium from sources such as this one could be used in thin-film modules, in which the cadmium would be sealed for 30 years and then recycled.

Cadmium suppliers are willing to take back cadmium wastes for re-smelting and recovery. Two U.S. Department of Energy Small Business Innovation Research grants to Solar Cells, Inc. (now First Solar) and Drinkard Metalox have allowed technology to be developed for recycling wastes from the PV manufacturing process and "spent" CdTe modules (Zweibel, Moskowitz and Fthenakis 1998).

The present recycling systems for batteries and electronics provide useful models for future endeavors (batteries containing cadmium are 100% recyclable, and the recycling costs of approximately 5 cents per Watt are viable). This topic is currently being examined by the industry.

Originally posted by cadick at 2010-06-08 00:18:45:


首页引用的美国能源部国家可再生能源实验室的页面中

提到：



1.为什么中国的Cd就便宜了？
2.美国商人为什么自己不生产原料了？
别完全相信老美的说辞，因为他们说的话只对美国人无害。

...

Originally posted by floljf at 2010-06-08 09:06:54:


杂质的链接分享一下吧，谢谢！

Originally posted by cadick at 2010-06-08 21:47:36:



photon international
http://www.photon-magazine.com/

全文的话....这里研究所订阅了杂志。

Originally posted by 元小雪 at 2010-06-05 00:01:24:
终极答案是，因为可以发文章！
我就在做这玩意儿，没事