【调剂】北京石油化工学院2024年16个专业接受调剂
查看: 1417  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者是个好影迷将赠送您 5 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

是个好影迷

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 请问elsevier这个revise-language状态是需要大修吗?已有3人参与

投了一个三区文章现在第二次大修的意见返回View Decision的状态是revise-language,但是给了两个月。
编辑的意见是:
Reviewer comments on your manuscript indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, I invite you to submit a revised version of your manuscript if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments included below.

If you submit a revised manuscript, please consider the reviewer's comments carefully. Please resubmit your manuscript by Nov 28, 2022.

然后直接贴了两个评审的评分表给我:

1. Are the objectives and the rationale of the study clearly stated?


Reviewer #1: The objectives and the rationale are clearly described.

Reviewer #3: 1、well stated

--------------------

2. If applicable, is the application/theory/method/study reported in sufficient detail to allow for its replicability and/or reproducibility?

Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

3. If applicable, are statistical analyses, controls, sampling mechanism, and statistical reporting (e.g., P-values, CIs, effect sizes) appropriate and well described?

Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

4. Could the manuscript benefit from additional tables or figures, or from improving or removing (some of the) existing ones?

Please provide specific suggestions for improvements, removals, or additions of figures or tables. Please number each suggestion so that author(s) can more easily respond.

Reviewer #1: Tables and figures are fine.

Reviewer #3: the results had been well stated.

--------------------

5. If applicable, are the interpretation of results and study conclusions supported by the data?


Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [] No [] N/A [X]
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

6. Have the authors clearly emphasized the strengths of their study/theory/methods/argument?

Reviewer #1: They clearly described their strength of the study,

Reviewer #3: No.
highlights had not been well emphasized.

--------------------

7. Have the authors clearly stated the limitations of their study/theory/methods/argument?


Reviewer #1: Yes, they clearly mentioned the limitation.

Reviewer #3: 1. should be further analyzed in this research.

--------------------

8. Does the manuscript structure, flow or writing need improving (e.g., the addition of subheadings, shortening of text, reorganization of sections, or moving details from one section to another)?

Reviewer #1: The structure of the paper is fine,

Reviewer #3: 1. The logical meaning of some sentence are confusing,;
such as "Hence, .... efficiency and usability."
2. there were a fair amount of grammatical errors found in this manuscript.

--------------------

9. Could the manuscript benefit from language editing?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

主要是评审3提了①highlight写得不够好,②结果需要进一步分析,③提了一个语法问题但认为文章需要润色

其实我二审已经润色过了,并且附上了elsevier的语言编辑证书,评审1觉得语言没问题,评审3觉得有问题

关键编辑这句it is not acceptable for publication in its present form是套话还是委婉的拒稿.....
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

风筝不想飞呀

木虫之王 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+1, 有帮助 2022-10-01 01:09:19
楼主的情况并非直接拒稿,顶多算是拒稿重投。既然编辑给了修改机会,就好好按照审稿意见修改,尤其是审稿人3,还是有希望的,祝好运。
成王败寇
3楼2022-09-30 20:03:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 4 个回答

cyh_crl

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+2, 有帮助 2022-10-01 01:08:33
it is not acceptable for publication in its present form
这句话只是说明你的论文需要修改,并且几乎是最流行的返修模板
2楼2022-09-30 17:18:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2022-10-01 01:09:09
按审稿人3的意见再修改一下,看上去主要是语言的改进。
4楼2022-09-30 20:56:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 国自然青年基金只有一篇能第一标注,其他都是第二标注能结题吗? 10+3 lice_1987 2024-04-18 5/250 2024-04-18 23:21 by nono2009
[论文投稿] 最近遇到这样一个问题 4+3 asd123gfa689 2024-04-18 6/300 2024-04-18 18:43 by chaodanming
[找工作] 事业单位还是大学好? +14 青萍之沫 2024-04-16 15/750 2024-04-18 18:04 by 鱼翔浅底1
[有机交流] 傅克酰基化,产率大于百分之一百,求解,很急 90+4 hsn991013 2024-04-15 10/500 2024-04-18 15:38 by lkw0604
[基金申请] 国家资助博士后BC档出校后资助的概率多大? +3 卡卡罗特哦 2024-04-16 3/150 2024-04-18 12:58 by wolfgangHugh
[论文投稿] The total environment格式 25+4 lyyyyds0 2024-04-13 9/450 2024-04-18 09:33 by 我为人人研
[考研] 275求调剂 +8 调剂0856 2024-04-14 10/500 2024-04-17 23:23 by 华北刘兵
[无机/物化] H3PO2在130度附近分解为磷化氢(剧毒),怎样防护,求指点。 1(金币+5) +3 大力2010 2024-04-13 9/450 2024-04-17 21:55 by 大力2010
[论文投稿] 可以打电话问编辑部是否可以先发录用通知吗 +7 双倍好运锦鲤 2024-04-14 10/500 2024-04-17 13:38 by cjzhu
[考研] 322求调剂 +7 本己上岸 2024-04-16 7/350 2024-04-17 11:49 by duanxz
[有机交流] 关于DMF +6 农药害害 2024-04-13 6/300 2024-04-16 15:57 by hwqMSE
[考研] 294求调剂 +3 694062003 2024-04-15 4/200 2024-04-16 15:01 by 邹邹哈哈
[考博] 2024博士招生-9月入学 +17 firen2020 2024-04-12 20/1000 2024-04-16 11:54 by 我要上福
[考研] 专硕调剂招生 +3 电致发光 2024-04-15 4/200 2024-04-15 07:34 by ashorewmj
[考研] 323求调剂 +15 啊Q精神~ 2024-04-13 17/850 2024-04-14 12:44 by qjhawk
[考研] 338求调剂 +3 18280338551 2024-04-14 5/250 2024-04-14 10:03 by tcni
[考研] 271,环境科学与工程,调剂申请,有学上就行 +5 有学上$ 2024-04-12 5/250 2024-04-13 21:58 by may_新宇
[考研] 298求调剂 +6 新阶段+有 2024-04-12 8/400 2024-04-13 17:42 by 新阶段+有
[论文投稿] material research express还没交开源版面费,已经线上出版了 10+3 lzjslyz 2024-04-12 3/150 2024-04-13 11:09 by kingzgh
[考研] 284求调剂 +5 15130653721 2024-04-12 6/300 2024-04-12 18:57 by qikanlunwen
信息提示
请填处理意见