【调剂】北京石油化工学院2024年16个专业接受调剂
查看: 1430  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者是个好影迷将赠送您 5 个金币

是个好影迷

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 请问elsevier这个revise-language状态是需要大修吗?已有3人参与

投了一个三区文章现在第二次大修的意见返回View Decision的状态是revise-language,但是给了两个月。
编辑的意见是:
Reviewer comments on your manuscript indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, I invite you to submit a revised version of your manuscript if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments included below.

If you submit a revised manuscript, please consider the reviewer's comments carefully. Please resubmit your manuscript by Nov 28, 2022.

然后直接贴了两个评审的评分表给我:

1. Are the objectives and the rationale of the study clearly stated?


Reviewer #1: The objectives and the rationale are clearly described.

Reviewer #3: 1、well stated

--------------------

2. If applicable, is the application/theory/method/study reported in sufficient detail to allow for its replicability and/or reproducibility?

Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

3. If applicable, are statistical analyses, controls, sampling mechanism, and statistical reporting (e.g., P-values, CIs, effect sizes) appropriate and well described?

Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

4. Could the manuscript benefit from additional tables or figures, or from improving or removing (some of the) existing ones?

Please provide specific suggestions for improvements, removals, or additions of figures or tables. Please number each suggestion so that author(s) can more easily respond.

Reviewer #1: Tables and figures are fine.

Reviewer #3: the results had been well stated.

--------------------

5. If applicable, are the interpretation of results and study conclusions supported by the data?


Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [] No [] N/A [X]
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

6. Have the authors clearly emphasized the strengths of their study/theory/methods/argument?

Reviewer #1: They clearly described their strength of the study,

Reviewer #3: No.
highlights had not been well emphasized.

--------------------

7. Have the authors clearly stated the limitations of their study/theory/methods/argument?


Reviewer #1: Yes, they clearly mentioned the limitation.

Reviewer #3: 1. should be further analyzed in this research.

--------------------

8. Does the manuscript structure, flow or writing need improving (e.g., the addition of subheadings, shortening of text, reorganization of sections, or moving details from one section to another)?

Reviewer #1: The structure of the paper is fine,

Reviewer #3: 1. The logical meaning of some sentence are confusing,;
such as "Hence, .... efficiency and usability."
2. there were a fair amount of grammatical errors found in this manuscript.

--------------------

9. Could the manuscript benefit from language editing?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

主要是评审3提了①highlight写得不够好,②结果需要进一步分析,③提了一个语法问题但认为文章需要润色

其实我二审已经润色过了,并且附上了elsevier的语言编辑证书,评审1觉得语言没问题,评审3觉得有问题

关键编辑这句it is not acceptable for publication in its present form是套话还是委婉的拒稿.....
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cyh_crl

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+2, 有帮助 2022-10-01 01:08:33
it is not acceptable for publication in its present form
这句话只是说明你的论文需要修改,并且几乎是最流行的返修模板
2楼2022-09-30 17:18:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

风筝不想飞呀

木虫之王 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+1, 有帮助 2022-10-01 01:09:19
楼主的情况并非直接拒稿,顶多算是拒稿重投。既然编辑给了修改机会,就好好按照审稿意见修改,尤其是审稿人3,还是有希望的,祝好运。
成王败寇
3楼2022-09-30 20:03:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2022-10-01 01:09:09
按审稿人3的意见再修改一下,看上去主要是语言的改进。
4楼2022-09-30 20:56:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 是个好影迷 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[博后之家] 南京大学-广州大学联合招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才!!! +4 黑魔变身啾 2024-04-20 11/550 2024-04-25 00:03 by 黑魔变身啾
[教师之家] 召集青年编委 +3 bergersci 2024-04-22 6/300 2024-04-24 23:44 by 麦克阿??
[基金申请] 国社科项目,你们学校都限额申报吗? +6 屡战屡败 2024-04-21 8/400 2024-04-24 22:04 by njuzmwu
[硕博家园] 聊天 +9 暮色恋伊人 2024-04-22 10/500 2024-04-24 19:34 by liubai000
[考博] 24年 申博 化学/材料 一作6篇sci +9 wangyp123 2024-04-23 11/550 2024-04-24 19:01 by bangbangbiu
[教师之家] 国内科研环境差导致国内科研水平差的根源 +12 zju2000 2024-04-18 14/700 2024-04-24 16:41 by xiaoyucau
[考博] 博士招生 +4 zx179 2024-04-24 7/350 2024-04-24 15:01 by H考研成功
[教师之家] 期末给学生划重点都是什么话术啊 +15 luokereng 2024-04-20 17/850 2024-04-24 13:15 by zxdno1
[有机交流] 紧急求助,有谁用过三甲基硅醇钾TMSOK吗? 1000+3 genius2008 2024-04-19 10/500 2024-04-24 12:37 by genius2008
[论文投稿] 期刊推荐 20+4 木颜尘ip 2024-04-22 7/350 2024-04-24 10:06 by bobvan
[教师之家] 找工作过程中碰到好多人问南京某新换校长211的政策,规定如下 +15 ZHONGWU_U 2024-04-21 17/850 2024-04-24 05:12 by juta256
[论文投稿] 最近遇到这样一个问题 +4 asd123gfa689 2024-04-18 11/550 2024-04-23 20:14 by asd123gfa689
[考博] 重庆大学计算机学院2024博士招生 +4 y_y_y_yyy 2024-04-18 6/300 2024-04-23 16:31 by 让一切随风l
[电化学] 有偿收购废弃锂硫电池 +3 汤圆喵 2024-04-19 5/250 2024-04-23 10:41 by Happy C
[教师之家] 河海大学常州校区新进的讲师待遇如何?考核要求如何? +3 德国小球迷 2024-04-19 18/900 2024-04-22 19:23 by ZHONGWU_U
[高分子] 请问UV灯是365nm的,那么选光引发剂的波长选多少的?要完全一致吗? +4 engledd2004 2024-04-21 4/200 2024-04-22 16:08 by wangcz23
[考博] 青岛科技大学顾玉超教授课题组招收博士生 +3 yanqingwang 2024-04-19 3/150 2024-04-22 15:21 by 理科生yes
[找工作] 化工专业 10+3 xiao太阳94 2024-04-18 7/350 2024-04-22 13:48 by mlnjut
[论文投稿] 催稿后秒拒 +9 lizhengke06 2024-04-19 11/550 2024-04-21 22:29 by ggjjyyy
[论文投稿] SCI 评审意见回复 模板 15+3 Kilig0317 2024-04-18 4/200 2024-04-19 08:46 by bobvan
信息提示
请填处理意见