24小时热门版块排行榜     意得辑感恩【钜惠】,润色低至88折

查看: 555  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者是个好影迷将赠送您 5 个金币

是个好影迷

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 请问elsevier这个revise-language状态是需要大修吗?已有3人参与

投了一个三区文章现在第二次大修的意见返回View Decision的状态是revise-language,但是给了两个月。
编辑的意见是:
Reviewer comments on your manuscript indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, I invite you to submit a revised version of your manuscript if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments included below.

If you submit a revised manuscript, please consider the reviewer's comments carefully. Please resubmit your manuscript by Nov 28, 2022.

然后直接贴了两个评审的评分表给我:

1. Are the objectives and the rationale of the study clearly stated?


Reviewer #1: The objectives and the rationale are clearly described.

Reviewer #3: 1、well stated

--------------------

2. If applicable, is the application/theory/method/study reported in sufficient detail to allow for its replicability and/or reproducibility?

Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

3. If applicable, are statistical analyses, controls, sampling mechanism, and statistical reporting (e.g., P-values, CIs, effect sizes) appropriate and well described?

Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

4. Could the manuscript benefit from additional tables or figures, or from improving or removing (some of the) existing ones?

Please provide specific suggestions for improvements, removals, or additions of figures or tables. Please number each suggestion so that author(s) can more easily respond.

Reviewer #1: Tables and figures are fine.

Reviewer #3: the results had been well stated.

--------------------

5. If applicable, are the interpretation of results and study conclusions supported by the data?


Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [X] No [] N/A []
Provide further comments here:

Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X:
Yes [] No [] N/A [X]
Provide further comments here:

--------------------

6. Have the authors clearly emphasized the strengths of their study/theory/methods/argument?

Reviewer #1: They clearly described their strength of the study,

Reviewer #3: No.
highlights had not been well emphasized.

--------------------

7. Have the authors clearly stated the limitations of their study/theory/methods/argument?


Reviewer #1: Yes, they clearly mentioned the limitation.

Reviewer #3: 1. should be further analyzed in this research.

--------------------

8. Does the manuscript structure, flow or writing need improving (e.g., the addition of subheadings, shortening of text, reorganization of sections, or moving details from one section to another)?

Reviewer #1: The structure of the paper is fine,

Reviewer #3: 1. The logical meaning of some sentence are confusing,;
such as "Hence, .... efficiency and usability."
2. there were a fair amount of grammatical errors found in this manuscript.

--------------------

9. Could the manuscript benefit from language editing?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

主要是评审3提了①highlight写得不够好,②结果需要进一步分析,③提了一个语法问题但认为文章需要润色

其实我二审已经润色过了,并且附上了elsevier的语言编辑证书,评审1觉得语言没问题,评审3觉得有问题

关键编辑这句it is not acceptable for publication in its present form是套话还是委婉的拒稿.....
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cyh_crl

金虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+2, 有帮助 2022-10-01 01:08:33
it is not acceptable for publication in its present form
这句话只是说明你的论文需要修改,并且几乎是最流行的返修模板
2楼2022-09-30 17:18:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

风筝不想飞呀

木虫之王 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+1, 有帮助 2022-10-01 01:09:19
楼主的情况并非直接拒稿,顶多算是拒稿重投。既然编辑给了修改机会,就好好按照审稿意见修改,尤其是审稿人3,还是有希望的,祝好运。
成王败寇
3楼2022-09-30 20:03:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
是个好影迷: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2022-10-01 01:09:09
按审稿人3的意见再修改一下,看上去主要是语言的改进。
4楼2022-09-30 20:56:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 是个好影迷 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 厦门大学屈小波国家优青团队博士生(医学/工学)招募通知 +5 屈教授助理 2022-12-02 5/250 2022-12-04 22:22 by guoqiang30
[考博] 有没有不需要雅思的读博机会 +21 孑孓独行 2022-12-01 40/2000 2022-12-04 22:02 by tangm
[基金申请] 博后面上的经费大概多久到账? +3 Guerrouj 2022-12-01 6/300 2022-12-04 20:48 by zxy964777869
[公派出国] 去美国联培,计划12月份出行,有一起的小伙伴吗? +10 shao134870 2022-11-28 20/1000 2022-12-04 20:44 by goujia122
[硕博家园] 博士就业选择问题 +24 wen862462709 2022-12-01 40/2000 2022-12-04 20:23 by wen862462709
[论文投稿] 印度人的论文——说说审稿感受 +8 Ruddlesden 2022-12-03 10/500 2022-12-04 19:44 by wickol2010
[论文投稿] 学术编辑审核拖延时间! +6 1219173232 2022-12-02 11/550 2022-12-04 16:55 by newind
[教师之家] 为何职称评审一直是我们的痛? +9 lilac_c 2022-11-29 11/550 2022-12-04 15:55 by 让你笑一下
[硕博家园] 科研好难呀 +8 冲冲冲??? 2022-12-03 9/450 2022-12-04 15:13 by shl2112501
[硕博家园] 崩溃的心情 +7 呵呵orc 2022-11-30 8/400 2022-12-04 14:36 by 花城殿
[硕博家园] 寻求联培学生 +9 gufu 2022-12-02 9/450 2022-12-04 13:44 by 鱼翔浅底1
[公派出国] 巴塞罗那自治大学 CSC 2023博士招生 +6 安心睡枕 2022-11-28 9/450 2022-12-04 13:30 by guoqiang30
[论文投稿] 中科院分区2022版什么时候出来 +10 qujia001 2022-12-03 10/500 2022-12-04 11:29 by wpie99
[硕博家园] 心情 +24 暮色恋伊人 2022-11-30 31/1550 2022-12-04 07:53 by bfyang
[论文投稿] Journal of Applied Polymer Science二审意见迟迟不下来 50+3 大梦同学 2022-11-30 8/400 2022-12-03 23:19 by 大梦同学
[动植物] 这是什么植物?果实类似连在一起的山楂? +5 youmeus 2022-11-28 8/400 2022-12-03 20:37 by 还是植物好
[硕博家园] 博后讲师并行 +4 小飞哥SJTU 2022-12-03 17/850 2022-12-03 14:13 by 小飞哥SJTU
[论文投稿] 投稿Food Chemistry格式 5+3 化学理学 2022-12-02 7/350 2022-12-03 11:26 by 化学理学
[找工作] 安徽科技学院怎么样? +7 284926268 2022-11-29 11/550 2022-12-02 08:29 by RJH零
[论文投稿] Editor's comments 中 “Avoid keywords that are in the title”是什么意思 50+4 yhnyxm 2022-11-28 12/600 2022-11-29 18:48 by 全凭一张嘴
信息提示
请填处理意见