¡¾µ÷¼Á¡¿±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2024Äê16¸öרҵ½ÓÊܵ÷¼Á
²é¿´: 2034  |  »Ø¸´: 25
µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ­´æµµ¡£

ljl1205

ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

[½»Á÷] ´ó¼Ò°ÑÊÕµ½µÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û¶¼·¢ÉÏÀ´°É

´ó¼Ò°ÑÊÕµ½µÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û¶¼·¢ÉÏÀ´°É£¬É¹É¹¿´¿´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÆÀ¼Û£¬ÓÐûÓÐ×îºÃµÄÆÀÓÈð³µÈÕ°ÑöÒ»ÏÂ
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

ljl1205

ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

80¸ö½ð±Ò£¬´òÔìÅ£È˵ÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û»ãºÏ
2Â¥2009-09-09 21:47:42
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

goodtimega

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

This manuscript has two major parts. The one is correct is not innovative, and the one is innovative is not correct. Therefore, I would suggest the authors retake quantum chemistry courses and then consider submitting to this type of prestigious journal.
3Â¥2009-09-09 21:58:28
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

bjlumang

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)

COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS

Reviewer #1: It is a well written paper with a clear objective and well designed experiments. The findings are a relevant contribution in the field of engineered bioremediation.
However, a few minor  issues should be addressed:

Reviewer #2: This is a good work to combine the bioslurry and two-liquid-phase systems in order to biological degrade persistant contaminants. It contains a variety of chemical and biochemical analysis in order to evaluate the performance of system. However, as I read the manuscript, I theink it need a minor revision about following comments:
4Â¥2009-09-09 22:18:43
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

dd2006425

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[ Last edited by dd2006425 on 2009-9-11 at 12:36 ]
5Â¥2009-09-09 22:23:14
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

wangwei2008

ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)

Сľ³æÖ®ÒÆ»¨¹¬Ö÷

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
ljl1205(½ð±Ò+5,VIP+0): 9-9 22:31
Reviewer #2: This paper reported the isolation and preliminary characterization of a *****that showed ******************.While the**are of value both as *********for improvement of ***************and as potential new *, there are some major concerns about the completeness and quality of the experiment, as well as the organization and English of the paper.
1. The introduction is very detailed on somaclonal variation, some of them are not necessary. For example,Paragraph 3 and 4 can be replaced by citing two or three relevant review papers
2. There are a number of publications documenting the genetic basis of ***************and more recently, the cloning of these genes, they should be part of the introduction and discussed against the result of this study in the Discussion. The lack of any genetic characterization of the induced resistance is the major shortfall of this research. If there is any data, it would be very helpful.
3. The yield performance of Tables 1, 2, 3 might be presented in a single figure, while other data, for example, *****might be given in the context (since more comprehensive data are given in table 4). *******with stdev would be sufficient for the Table 3.
4. For table 4, the presentation of data  for************ is different from mutants, the actual meaning should be explained.
5. In the Discussion, the last sentence of Paragraph 1 seems to be contradictory to the numerious successful examples given in Paragraph 2.
6. Also in the Discussion, Paragraph 4, it  stated that "************************************** .  This is indeed not true; the frequency is already extremely high to have*********from *considering no screening was done during**********. Therefore, the reasons for such a high ******** frequency should be discussed. Additionally, the possible underlining mechanism of the non-segregation**and ***** such as maturity and plant ******** which is extremely unusual, should be discussed.
7. Also in the Discussion, Paragraph 5 seems not very relevant and can be deleted.
8. Overall, the English needs a thorough revsion.
6Â¥2009-09-09 22:23:26
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

nono2009

³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)

No gains, no pains.

ÓÅÐãÇø³¤ÓÅÐãÇø³¤ÓÅÐãÇø³¤ÓÅÐãÇø³¤ÓÅÐã°æÖ÷

Withdrawn...

[ Last edited by nono2009 on 2009-9-10 at 06:37 ]
7Â¥2009-09-09 22:24:22
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

wyfwywyf

ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

Reviewer #1:  
This paper considers strong convergence of rowwise negatively orthant dependent random variables. Although I did not check all the detailed proofs, I found the mathematics used  here looks correct. However, the presentation style should be changed for a better readability. First of all, the title of Section 1 can be switched to Introduction and main result, where you can state motivation, history, definitions, regularity conditions, and main theorems. Then you create Section 2 for the proofs, where you put the preliminary results and proofs of theorems. Also, conditions (1.7)-(1.9) and (1.11)-(1.14) may be stated in the associated theorems. Since this is basically an extension of independent variables, the techniques used here might resemble those in earlier work. Thus some steps may be condensed without damaging the content.

Reviewer #2:
In this paper, the author studies the convergence of partial sums of rowwise NOD random variables. Although this paper is motivated by statistical application to reliability, this paper only considers a limit theorem, so the motive of this paper is a bit artificial for statisticians. This may be a weak point of this paper. To enrich the motivation and background on this subject, the author is required to cite more recent relevant results published in international journals.

The mathematics sounds correct, but many of proofs are standard arguments and some of them may be reduced. Overall, English in this article is fine, but the author can consult a native speaker. And give the full word of NA and the meaning of it.
8Â¥2009-09-09 22:36:14
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

yccycc

ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

ÒÔǰͶAFM,Ò»¸öºÜmeanµÄreviewer

In addition, the English writing is very poor, there are too many errors. I would not recommend publishing this work in the present form.
9Â¥2009-09-11 00:11:21
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

hellysir

Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

Ͷ¸åTerra NovaµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û

Reviewer: 1
The paper provides some good information regarding the XXXX. The paper is of reasonably broad international interest and should be of interest to readers of XXXX. Some sections of the text need rephrasing as they are a little unclear as they stand and there are a number of points that need to be addressed before publication. These are as follows:

Reviewer: 2
This ms describes a study of XXXX in XXXX and their use in XXXX. It is an extension of similar work done by the two lead authors on mode and will be of interest to geologists in general and marine geologists in particular. The ms is generally well written and easy to follow, although there are some typos and confusing sentences. There are a few problems with the reference list. This, however, does not negate the findings.
10Â¥2009-09-11 01:29:03
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌøת ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ ljl1205 µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍƼö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[½Ìʦ֮¼Ò] ·¢ÏÖ¶½µ¼ÔÚÌý¿Î£¬ÐèÒª¸úTAÕкôʾÒâÂð£¿ÓÐͬѧ¿´ÊÖ»ú¡¢¿Î¼þÓÐÊè©Ëã´óÎÊÌâÂ𣿠+4 ºÓÎ÷Ò¹ÀÉ 2024-04-19 4/200 2024-04-20 00:17 by LittleBush
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298Çóµ÷¼Á +9 Ëï´ó´ó@ 2024-04-17 9/450 2024-04-19 21:50 by Áõ¹úÄþ
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] Ò»ÉóÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬Ð¡ÐÞ£¬»áÔõôÑùѽ£¿ +9 ÁÖʦÃà 2024-04-18 9/450 2024-04-19 20:00 by nono2009
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] ×î½üÓöµ½ÕâÑùÒ»¸öÎÊÌâ 2+4 asd123gfa689 2024-04-18 10/500 2024-04-19 18:57 by asd123gfa689
[½Ìʦ֮¼Ò] ijϵÖ÷Èα»Í¬Ð£½ÌÊÚ¾Ù±¨°üÑøÇ鸾¡¢³¤ÆÚæÎæ½ +15 zju2000 2024-04-13 17/850 2024-04-19 18:17 by ZHONGWU_U
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] »ù½ðºÍÉúСº¢ +33 Ausy 2024-04-15 35/1750 2024-04-19 16:21 by feng6531
[¸ß·Ö×Ó] ¾Ûõ£°·650Óë»·ÑõÊ÷Ö¬e44¹Ì»¯ +3 yindingxin 2024-04-15 3/150 2024-04-19 13:55 by weilingdun
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÏÂÓêÁË +13 zju2000 2024-04-16 19/950 2024-04-19 09:24 by duxin_30
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] ¹ú¼ÒÖصãÑз¢¼Æ»®ÂÛÎÄ¿ÉÒÔ·¢MDPIÀïµÄÆÚ¿¯Âð +4 lin_2018 2024-04-17 4/200 2024-04-19 08:46 by TsolmonZ
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] Ͷ¸åÇóÖú 5+3 ÎÒÊÇÖÞÖÞ°¡ 2024-04-17 5/250 2024-04-18 17:13 by topedit
[¿¼ÑÐ] 274Çóµ÷¼Á +7 Ëĸö´ó×Ö£¬ÄãµÎº 2024-04-14 10/500 2024-04-17 22:38 by »ª±±Áõ±ø
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¹¤Ñ§322£¬Ó¢ÓïÁù¼¶Çóµ÷¼Á +3 domax 2024-04-17 10/500 2024-04-17 21:25 by ¶«·½»¨Ô°Ð¡Íò
[Óлú½»Á÷] ÔõôÇåÏ´ÉÕÆ¿ 20+5 ww34523 2024-04-16 6/300 2024-04-17 15:20 by 591950582
[¿¼ÑÐ] 322Çóµ÷¼Á +7 ±¾¼ºÉÏ°¶ 2024-04-16 7/350 2024-04-17 11:49 by duanxz
[¿¼ÑÐ] Õã½­º£Ñó´óѧ ´¬²°Ó뺣ÔËѧԺ ½»Í¨ÔËÊäר˶ £¨½»Í¨ÐÅÏ¢¹¤³Ì¼°¿ØÖÆ£©½ÓÊÕµ÷½Ú +4 joee 2024-04-15 8/400 2024-04-16 20:47 by TommyZiAng
[¿¼ÑÐ] 347Çóµ÷¼Á +3 º®³½ovo 2024-04-15 7/350 2024-04-16 19:05 by º®³½ovo
[Óлú½»Á÷] ¹ØÓÚDMF +6 Å©Ò©º¦º¦ 2024-04-13 6/300 2024-04-16 15:57 by hwqMSE
[¿¼ÑÐ] 329Çóµ÷¼Á +6 Kaylawander 2024-04-13 7/350 2024-04-16 12:00 by ·çÀ´»¨¿ª1
[Óлú½»Á÷] ÇóÒÒ¶þ´¼¼ì²â·½·¨ 13+3 YaShang 2024-04-14 4/200 2024-04-15 15:16 by Byltest
[¿¼ÑÐ] 086000Éúҽû¿¼Êýѧ304·Ö£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷Å©Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÍõÓÐÌïÓÐѧÉÏ 2024-04-13 5/250 2024-04-13 16:18 by coco1981
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û