小木虫仪器共享平台招商啦~
查看: 1250  |  回复: 25
当前主题已经存档。

ljl1205

木虫 (著名写手)


[交流] 大家把收到的审稿意见都发上来吧

大家把收到的审稿意见都发上来吧,晒晒看看审稿人的评价,有没有最好的评语,让俺等瞻仰一下
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐

论文投稿

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljl1205

木虫 (著名写手)


80个金币,打造牛人的审稿意见汇合
2楼2009-09-09 21:47:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

goodtimega

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


This manuscript has two major parts. The one is correct is not innovative, and the one is innovative is not correct. Therefore, I would suggest the authors retake quantum chemistry courses and then consider submitting to this type of prestigious journal.
3楼2009-09-09 21:58:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bjlumang

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS

Reviewer #1: It is a well written paper with a clear objective and well designed experiments. The findings are a relevant contribution in the field of engineered bioremediation.
However, a few minor  issues should be addressed:

Reviewer #2: This is a good work to combine the bioslurry and two-liquid-phase systems in order to biological degrade persistant contaminants. It contains a variety of chemical and biochemical analysis in order to evaluate the performance of system. However, as I read the manuscript, I theink it need a minor revision about following comments:
4楼2009-09-09 22:18:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dd2006425


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[ Last edited by dd2006425 on 2009-9-11 at 12:36 ]
5楼2009-09-09 22:23:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangwei2008

木虫 (职业作家)

小木虫之移花宫主

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ljl1205(金币+5,VIP+0): 9-9 22:31
Reviewer #2: This paper reported the isolation and preliminary characterization of a *****that showed ******************.While the**are of value both as *********for improvement of ***************and as potential new *, there are some major concerns about the completeness and quality of the experiment, as well as the organization and English of the paper.
1. The introduction is very detailed on somaclonal variation, some of them are not necessary. For example,Paragraph 3 and 4 can be replaced by citing two or three relevant review papers
2. There are a number of publications documenting the genetic basis of ***************and more recently, the cloning of these genes, they should be part of the introduction and discussed against the result of this study in the Discussion. The lack of any genetic characterization of the induced resistance is the major shortfall of this research. If there is any data, it would be very helpful.
3. The yield performance of Tables 1, 2, 3 might be presented in a single figure, while other data, for example, *****might be given in the context (since more comprehensive data are given in table 4). *******with stdev would be sufficient for the Table 3.
4. For table 4, the presentation of data  for************ is different from mutants, the actual meaning should be explained.
5. In the Discussion, the last sentence of Paragraph 1 seems to be contradictory to the numerious successful examples given in Paragraph 2.
6. Also in the Discussion, Paragraph 4, it  stated that "************************************** .  This is indeed not true; the frequency is already extremely high to have*********from *considering no screening was done during**********. Therefore, the reasons for such a high ******** frequency should be discussed. Additionally, the possible underlining mechanism of the non-segregation**and ***** such as maturity and plant ******** which is extremely unusual, should be discussed.
7. Also in the Discussion, Paragraph 5 seems not very relevant and can be deleted.
8. Overall, the English needs a thorough revsion.
6楼2009-09-09 22:23:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

Withdrawn...

[ Last edited by nono2009 on 2009-9-10 at 06:37 ]
7楼2009-09-09 22:24:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wyfwywyf

木虫 (著名写手)


Reviewer #1:  
This paper considers strong convergence of rowwise negatively orthant dependent random variables. Although I did not check all the detailed proofs, I found the mathematics used  here looks correct. However, the presentation style should be changed for a better readability. First of all, the title of Section 1 can be switched to Introduction and main result, where you can state motivation, history, definitions, regularity conditions, and main theorems. Then you create Section 2 for the proofs, where you put the preliminary results and proofs of theorems. Also, conditions (1.7)-(1.9) and (1.11)-(1.14) may be stated in the associated theorems. Since this is basically an extension of independent variables, the techniques used here might resemble those in earlier work. Thus some steps may be condensed without damaging the content.

Reviewer #2:
In this paper, the author studies the convergence of partial sums of rowwise NOD random variables. Although this paper is motivated by statistical application to reliability, this paper only considers a limit theorem, so the motive of this paper is a bit artificial for statisticians. This may be a weak point of this paper. To enrich the motivation and background on this subject, the author is required to cite more recent relevant results published in international journals.

The mathematics sounds correct, but many of proofs are standard arguments and some of them may be reduced. Overall, English in this article is fine, but the author can consult a native speaker. And give the full word of NA and the meaning of it.
8楼2009-09-09 22:36:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yccycc

木虫 (著名写手)


以前投AFM,一个很mean的reviewer

In addition, the English writing is very poor, there are too many errors. I would not recommend publishing this work in the present form.
9楼2009-09-11 00:11:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hellysir

银虫 (正式写手)

投稿Terra Nova的审稿意见

Reviewer: 1
The paper provides some good information regarding the XXXX. The paper is of reasonably broad international interest and should be of interest to readers of XXXX. Some sections of the text need rephrasing as they are a little unclear as they stand and there are a number of points that need to be addressed before publication. These are as follows:

Reviewer: 2
This ms describes a study of XXXX in XXXX and their use in XXXX. It is an extension of similar work done by the two lead authors on mode and will be of interest to geologists in general and marine geologists in particular. The ms is generally well written and easy to follow, although there are some typos and confusing sentences. There are a few problems with the reference list. This, however, does not negate the findings.
10楼2009-09-11 01:29:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ljl1205 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 大家有没有收到评审意见的吗? +3 求易 2017-08-20 4/200 2017-08-20 16:42 by talisman
[高分子] 考研 +8 小萧默 2017-08-17 21/1050 2017-08-20 16:39 by yueyue_qian
[访问学者] 关于地方项目的申请访学时间与实际出国时间要求 +4 xyz881100 2017-08-19 5/250 2017-08-20 16:14 by 星辰夏天
[论文投稿] Springer旗下的special issue 问题求助 30+3 renfujie 2017-08-19 10/500 2017-08-20 15:02 by tdwrn99
[论文投稿] 投国外sci,国内的老板在上面是编委有用吗。能不能加快速度审稿等 +7 yan1988811 2017-08-20 7/350 2017-08-20 12:01 by 图像猫
[基金申请] 这样的评审意见没有上会? +18 jiangyunhua 2017-08-19 25/1250 2017-08-20 06:07 by 小明大哥大
[基金申请] 基金外审意见就是垃圾 +34 lacey_2008 2017-08-19 47/2350 2017-08-19 21:15 by lacey_2008
[职场人生] 有人说过去发生的要接受不是怀念 +5 何须情深 2017-08-19 6/300 2017-08-19 20:56 by leijiazhi88
[论文投稿] 悬赏本人全部金币,求解决论文返修的问题。 +7 filtration 2017-08-18 33/1650 2017-08-19 20:13 by camxf02
[硕博家园] 找缘分啦 +9 hbff 2017-08-19 23/1150 2017-08-19 18:34 by 时间在撒谎
[基金申请] 没中的是否可以看到评审意见? +4 arboricity 2017-08-18 4/200 2017-08-19 16:10 by dhscezn614
[基金申请] 难道要收到基金委两封信? +4 jordonjn 2017-08-18 4/200 2017-08-18 21:30 by 旋风马
[基金申请] 头年就中了,我相信还是公平的 +46 shihaojia 2017-08-17 47/2350 2017-08-18 18:43 by shihaojia
[基金申请] 这下满意了,感谢jjw +12 want0075286 2017-08-18 12/600 2017-08-18 13:19 by yuchj
[基金申请] 看到好多人都中了,恭喜啊 +3 yang4212 2017-08-17 8/400 2017-08-17 17:19 by 人生路途
[基金申请] 工材学部有中标验证漏洞的吗 +4 j8815 2017-08-17 7/350 2017-08-17 10:04 by j8815
[职场人生] 职业规划 (金币+2) +5 evacuation 2017-08-16 8/400 2017-08-17 09:30 by MrWilliam
[基金申请] 进度条的颜色以及下面字体的颜色,有图 +11 jxhj 2017-08-17 16/800 2017-08-17 07:01 by highhl
[分析] 20多个样,为什么我的几个平行还好,但是质控却惨不忍睹 +6 别逗我了 2017-08-15 6/300 2017-08-17 06:38 by songpingzz
[考博] 本人现在研二体育专业,想去韩国读博 +4 18679282335 2017-08-16 4/200 2017-08-16 18:55 by 广志1988
信息提示
请填处理意见