仪器共享平台,你入驻了吗?

热门推荐

查看: 1250  |  回复: 25
当前主题已经存档。

ljl1205

木虫 (著名写手)


[交流] 大家把收到的审稿意见都发上来吧

大家把收到的审稿意见都发上来吧,晒晒看看审稿人的评价,有没有最好的评语,让俺等瞻仰一下
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljl1205

木虫 (著名写手)


80个金币,打造牛人的审稿意见汇合
2楼2009-09-09 21:47:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

goodtimega

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


This manuscript has two major parts. The one is correct is not innovative, and the one is innovative is not correct. Therefore, I would suggest the authors retake quantum chemistry courses and then consider submitting to this type of prestigious journal.
3楼2009-09-09 21:58:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bjlumang

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS

Reviewer #1: It is a well written paper with a clear objective and well designed experiments. The findings are a relevant contribution in the field of engineered bioremediation.
However, a few minor  issues should be addressed:

Reviewer #2: This is a good work to combine the bioslurry and two-liquid-phase systems in order to biological degrade persistant contaminants. It contains a variety of chemical and biochemical analysis in order to evaluate the performance of system. However, as I read the manuscript, I theink it need a minor revision about following comments:
4楼2009-09-09 22:18:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dd2006425


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[ Last edited by dd2006425 on 2009-9-11 at 12:36 ]
5楼2009-09-09 22:23:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangwei2008

木虫 (职业作家)

小木虫之移花宫主

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ljl1205(金币+5,VIP+0): 9-9 22:31
Reviewer #2: This paper reported the isolation and preliminary characterization of a *****that showed ******************.While the**are of value both as *********for improvement of ***************and as potential new *, there are some major concerns about the completeness and quality of the experiment, as well as the organization and English of the paper.
1. The introduction is very detailed on somaclonal variation, some of them are not necessary. For example,Paragraph 3 and 4 can be replaced by citing two or three relevant review papers
2. There are a number of publications documenting the genetic basis of ***************and more recently, the cloning of these genes, they should be part of the introduction and discussed against the result of this study in the Discussion. The lack of any genetic characterization of the induced resistance is the major shortfall of this research. If there is any data, it would be very helpful.
3. The yield performance of Tables 1, 2, 3 might be presented in a single figure, while other data, for example, *****might be given in the context (since more comprehensive data are given in table 4). *******with stdev would be sufficient for the Table 3.
4. For table 4, the presentation of data  for************ is different from mutants, the actual meaning should be explained.
5. In the Discussion, the last sentence of Paragraph 1 seems to be contradictory to the numerious successful examples given in Paragraph 2.
6. Also in the Discussion, Paragraph 4, it  stated that "************************************** .  This is indeed not true; the frequency is already extremely high to have*********from *considering no screening was done during**********. Therefore, the reasons for such a high ******** frequency should be discussed. Additionally, the possible underlining mechanism of the non-segregation**and ***** such as maturity and plant ******** which is extremely unusual, should be discussed.
7. Also in the Discussion, Paragraph 5 seems not very relevant and can be deleted.
8. Overall, the English needs a thorough revsion.
6楼2009-09-09 22:23:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

Withdrawn...

[ Last edited by nono2009 on 2009-9-10 at 06:37 ]
7楼2009-09-09 22:24:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wyfwywyf

木虫 (著名写手)


Reviewer #1:  
This paper considers strong convergence of rowwise negatively orthant dependent random variables. Although I did not check all the detailed proofs, I found the mathematics used  here looks correct. However, the presentation style should be changed for a better readability. First of all, the title of Section 1 can be switched to Introduction and main result, where you can state motivation, history, definitions, regularity conditions, and main theorems. Then you create Section 2 for the proofs, where you put the preliminary results and proofs of theorems. Also, conditions (1.7)-(1.9) and (1.11)-(1.14) may be stated in the associated theorems. Since this is basically an extension of independent variables, the techniques used here might resemble those in earlier work. Thus some steps may be condensed without damaging the content.

Reviewer #2:
In this paper, the author studies the convergence of partial sums of rowwise NOD random variables. Although this paper is motivated by statistical application to reliability, this paper only considers a limit theorem, so the motive of this paper is a bit artificial for statisticians. This may be a weak point of this paper. To enrich the motivation and background on this subject, the author is required to cite more recent relevant results published in international journals.

The mathematics sounds correct, but many of proofs are standard arguments and some of them may be reduced. Overall, English in this article is fine, but the author can consult a native speaker. And give the full word of NA and the meaning of it.
8楼2009-09-09 22:36:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yccycc

木虫 (著名写手)


以前投AFM,一个很mean的reviewer

In addition, the English writing is very poor, there are too many errors. I would not recommend publishing this work in the present form.
9楼2009-09-11 00:11:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hellysir

银虫 (正式写手)

投稿Terra Nova的审稿意见

Reviewer: 1
The paper provides some good information regarding the XXXX. The paper is of reasonably broad international interest and should be of interest to readers of XXXX. Some sections of the text need rephrasing as they are a little unclear as they stand and there are a number of points that need to be addressed before publication. These are as follows:

Reviewer: 2
This ms describes a study of XXXX in XXXX and their use in XXXX. It is an extension of similar work done by the two lead authors on mode and will be of interest to geologists in general and marine geologists in particular. The ms is generally well written and easy to follow, although there are some typos and confusing sentences. There are a few problems with the reference list. This, however, does not negate the findings.
10楼2009-09-11 01:29:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ljl1205 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[留学生活] 诚招男友 +11 宝、嗳 2017-11-17 12/600 2017-11-20 00:09 by lgtkk
[论文投稿] transfer desk 撤稿 99(金币+10) +4 lk556686 2017-11-18 13/650 2017-11-19 22:33 by lk556686
[硕博家园] 博士期间出国交流一定很好吗 +8 Annelovely 2017-11-13 8/400 2017-11-19 18:15 by likai888love
[考博] 如何找到博导的联系方式? +3 lmji101026 2017-11-15 6/300 2017-11-19 07:38 by lmji101026
[教师之家] 迷茫中,博士毕业找工作去哪个学校好 +29 y1029641779 2017-11-16 49/2450 2017-11-18 20:06 by 我是丢丢
[职场人生] 工作 +9 1882925 2017-11-18 22/1100 2017-11-18 17:13 by 1882925
[留学DIY] 求教留学 +5 lcb0310 2017-11-15 8/400 2017-11-18 14:59 by 中弹的野兽
[公派出国] Skype面试 因为网络问题被搞砸了 +15 DHMMKE 2017-11-13 25/1250 2017-11-18 13:17 by 流云0807
[硕博家园] 海藻酸钠凝胶实验 +8 孔子后代88 2017-11-16 12/600 2017-11-17 22:58 by 孔子后代88
[药学] 请问1.5-3.0分的药化的英文杂志有哪些可以推荐的吗? 50+3 Mr_Oking 2017-11-16 11/550 2017-11-17 19:07 by Mr_Oking
[考博] 如何邀请第二推荐人? +5 海之祭司 2017-11-17 8/400 2017-11-17 14:24 by 科研帝论坛
[论文投稿] 已结见刊半个月的论文为何在Research Gate上搜不到? +7 zhuxinyao 2017-11-15 11/550 2017-11-16 21:15 by zhuxinyao
[留学DIY] 澳大利亚UNSW招收博士-高分子复合材料方向,提供全额奖学金 (金币+10) +3 SP_XMC 2017-11-15 6/300 2017-11-16 21:02 by vivi010203
[有机交流] 【求助】在做课题不知道这个是什么 +4 跳跃的风 2017-11-14 7/350 2017-11-16 19:11 by qjf1996
[有机交流] 黄酮两个苯环上氢化学位移差别较大的原因 8+5 ly06_12 2017-11-15 6/300 2017-11-16 10:57 by celan
[公派出国] 求助贴 +3 另一种523 2017-11-15 3/150 2017-11-15 13:18 by castalli
[论文投稿] 请问大家sci论文返修期间可以再增加一个第二作者吗? +17 keep! 2017-11-14 34/1700 2017-11-14 23:26 by keep!
[硕博家园] 关于origin做图问题 +11 CiroImmobile 2017-11-13 29/1450 2017-11-14 23:08 by h241683259
[硕博家园] 在职硕士 +4 朵拉MM 2017-11-13 7/350 2017-11-14 12:50 by 朵拉MM
[高分子] DSC固化温度的确定 20+3 18392675215 2017-11-14 5/250 2017-11-14 11:30 by huzhifeng09
信息提示
请填处理意见