【调剂】北京石油化工学院2024年16个专业接受调剂
查看: 955  |  回复: 17

罗爱我

新虫 (初入文坛)


[交流] 大家看看重投还有希望吗 小白第一次投稿 投的access

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Reject (updates required before resubmission)

Comments:
The authors proposed a face super-resolution (FSR) network based on a gradient information compensation module. This paper believes that the gradient information is beneficial to the performance of FSR, and designed a special module to extract the gradient information of the feature maps. I think this article is interesting and looks good, but there are still some issues that need to be revised (unordered):
(1) In order to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method, the authors conducted a series of ablation studies. However, ablation research must follow some principles. For example, when authors prove that their GRBs are beneficial to improve the performance of the network, they should not prove by reducing the number of GRBs. Because it is not clear whether the performance loss is due to the reduction in the number of parameters or the lack of gradient information. Considering that the gradient layer is an artificial design without any learnable parameters, and its computational complexity is negligible. So it seems more reasonable to delete the gradient layer directly and observe the network performance.
(2) The author declares "Since only the test code of FSRNet was released, we re-implement FSRNet with Pytorch". I would suggest highlighting this difference in Table 1 with ‘*’ or similar symbols.
(3) When comparing the proposed method with the SOTA method, the computational complexity and parameter amount of each method should also be listed, which will help to study the efficiency of the network.
(4) I think the author missed some existing methods, especially the SOTA method since 2020. I think the author needs to add several recent SOTA methods and compare the proposed method.

Comments:
This manuscript should be resubmitted after being revised according to the follows as
Comment 1:The overall framework of Figure 1 needs to be properly described. And some symbols in the figure are confused.

Comment 2:RCAB is used in the proposed method, but its introduction and implementation details are missing.

Comment 3:In page 6, the GFNet is compared with state-of-the-art methods and achieves better results. However, the comparison methods are put forward from 2014 to 2019. References are not the recent one and some appropriate key studies are missing.

Comment 4:In Abstract, “the proposed network is able to reconstruct fine face images with a performance improvement of 0.3 dB PSNR and 0.82 dB PNSR”. This is really confusing. What is the comparison method? How do you get the results of 0.3 dB PSNR and 0.82 dB PNSR? These are not mentioned in the text.

Comment 5:The format of references is incorrect, such as [1], [12], [14], [15], [20], etc.

Comment 6:To have an unbiased view in the paper, there should be some discussions on the limitations of the method.

Comment 7:The grammar needs to be carefully revised. There are many spelling mistakes, such as "dsuper-resolution" on page 2.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

conjurer1981

至尊木虫 (知名作家)



罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
只要可以改了再投,都有希望

发自小木虫Android客户端
8楼2021-12-01 06:51:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

专送一血

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)



罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
这不就是个大修么?才11条意见啊。好好改吧,机会大大的。

发自小木虫IOS客户端
10楼2021-12-01 07:12:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jackyu2014

木虫 (知名作家)



罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
好好修改,有希望的

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2021-11-30 22:53:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hnbossco

铜虫 (正式写手)



罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
好家伙!7个审稿人

发自小木虫Android客户端
6楼2021-11-30 23:18:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ruileelucky

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)



罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
9楼2021-12-01 06:52:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

grayong

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
拒稿重投,逐条修改,很有希望

发自小木虫Android客户端
12楼2021-12-01 08:17:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

前恋献俳俟

禁虫 (初入文坛)

本帖内容被屏蔽

13楼2021-12-01 09:54:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wvoqy_7777

新虫 (初入文坛)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
大致看了一下,感觉都不是致命的问题,而且意见比较具体,修改重投,机会很大。 实验他觉得不合理的还给了你修改思路。比较不充分的也提了添加比较的对象,编辑格式什么的都是小问题。
14楼2021-12-03 16:39:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaiwindy6

铁虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
有希望的
好好修改
然后proofreading 一下
好运
15楼2021-12-04 07:49:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

风筝不想飞呀

木虫之王 (文坛精英)


逐条更改吧,还有希望
16楼2021-12-04 08:30:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

洪帮主

金虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
这就是修改,access只有接收和拒稿两个选择,你这个相当于修改

发自小木虫IOS客户端
17楼2021-12-18 10:35:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

肥耳朵1895

新虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
等新分区出来再说吧,看看有没有出预警

发自小木虫IOS客户端
18楼2021-12-18 10:44:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
tzynew2楼
2021-11-30 22:35   回复  
罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
8 发自小木虫Android客户端
bjdxyxy3楼
2021-11-30 22:36   回复  
罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2021-11-30 22:41   回复  
罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
2021-11-30 23:30   回复  
罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200911楼
2021-12-01 07:58   回复  
罗爱我(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 罗爱我 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[博后之家] 南京大学-广州大学联合招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才!!! +4 黑魔变身啾 2024-04-20 8/400 2024-04-23 23:25 by 黑魔变身啾
[公派出国] 東京大学 应用化学专业柳田研究室 招收修士/博士生 +5 蝶梦123 2024-04-19 5/250 2024-04-23 22:40 by 90472jvvh
[考博] 真的好想读博! +7 wangzhe_bs 2024-04-22 9/450 2024-04-23 22:20 by wangzhe_bs
[硕博家园] 聊天 +8 暮色恋伊人 2024-04-22 9/450 2024-04-23 21:50 by 神圣省
[找工作] 工作问题求助 +3 向前?@ 2024-04-18 5/250 2024-04-23 21:25 by 向前?@
[硕博家园] 博士白读了 +33 Da_Meng_Zi 2024-04-21 36/1800 2024-04-23 17:22 by 李_q_y
[有机交流] 紧急求助,有谁用过三甲基硅醇钾TMSOK吗? 1000+3 genius2008 2024-04-19 8/400 2024-04-23 16:57 by czyzsu
[考博] 重庆大学计算机学院2024博士招生 +4 y_y_y_yyy 2024-04-18 6/300 2024-04-23 16:31 by 让一切随风l
[基金申请] 前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然,现在基金委发来调查函 +28 bjdxyxy 2024-04-19 44/2200 2024-04-23 16:29 by 淀粉搬运工
[考博] 山东大学化学与化工学院刘磊课题组博士研究生招生启事 +7 sdorganic 2024-04-17 9/450 2024-04-23 16:28 by 让一切随风l
[教师之家] 发现督导在听课,需要跟TA招呼示意吗?有同学看手机、课件有疏漏算大问题吗? +11 河西夜郎 2024-04-19 11/550 2024-04-23 15:01 by mylifecg
[基金申请] 颜宁:基础研究应顶天立地,立地即从需求端作为问题的出发点,立项背景就是面向真实需求 +10 zju2000 2024-04-18 10/500 2024-04-23 11:46 by 稻花香
[教师之家] 国内科研环境差导致国内科研水平差的根源 +8 zju2000 2024-04-18 8/400 2024-04-23 10:40 by Quakerbird
[基金申请] 特别资助审核状态 +12 pantray 2024-04-17 18/900 2024-04-23 09:50 by y20150913
[高分子] 请问UV灯是365nm的,那么选光引发剂的波长选多少的?要完全一致吗? +4 engledd2004 2024-04-21 4/200 2024-04-22 16:08 by wangcz23
[考研] 问题已经解决。 +13 lekinna 2024-04-19 30/1500 2024-04-22 13:09 by 矛dei到
[论文投稿] 催稿后秒拒 +9 lizhengke06 2024-04-19 11/550 2024-04-21 22:29 by ggjjyyy
[硕博家园] 材料工程,二本硕士,值得读吗 +3 简风23 2024-04-20 6/300 2024-04-21 12:19 by 简风23
[论文投稿] SCI 评审意见回复 模板 15+3 Kilig0317 2024-04-18 4/200 2024-04-19 08:46 by bobvan
[基金申请] 国自然青年基金只有一篇能第一标注,其他都是第二标注能结题吗? 10+4 lice_1987 2024-04-18 6/300 2024-04-19 08:29 by kudofaye
信息提示
请填处理意见