| 查看: 6052 | 回复: 46 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者bagzqab766将赠送您 50 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
bagzqab766金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
投了SCI小修后被拒，想问下可以不可以发邮件给编辑申诉已有19人参与
|
|
|
刚开始给我的小修意见很好：“The referee(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the referee(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.” 但是小修后感觉重新外审换了一个审稿人： “Unfortunately there are already numerous studies that use robotic equipment; mostly a robotic arm; to facilitate the use of the study of technology in educational and academic environments. A quick search of the IEEE database will give you a large number of references in this regard. From a novelty point of view, your study does nothing more than insist on it, but it does not contribute anything new that modifies or improves what already exists. In recent years, the use of IoT technology has been linked to these experiences, with which your paper does not contribute anything new in that sense either. For this reason I must advise to reject your paper.” 我觉得我搞了半年时间，而且已经小修了，怎么会出现完全不同的审稿意见，想问下这种情况可以找编辑申诉吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
期刊推荐
已经有7人回复
-
真的好想读博！
已经有10人回复
-
博士招生
已经有5人回复
-
前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然，现在基金委发来调查函
已经有45人回复
-
24年 申博 化学/材料 一作6篇sci
已经有6人回复
-
两类问题算是白选了~
已经有8人回复
-
博士论文被抄袭
已经有31人回复
-
国内科研环境差导致国内科研水平差的根源
已经有10人回复
-
期末给学生划重点都是什么话术啊
已经有16人回复
-
申博成果界定是根据Jcr分区还是中科院分区
已经有5人回复
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4326 (副教授)
- 金币: 30430.7
- 散金: 18010
- 红花: 322
- 帖子: 10538
- 在线: 1464.4小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
5楼2021-01-26 02:06:20
15