查看: 150  |  回复: 3

lkd-syl

金虫 (著名写手)

快乐家族

[交流] 拒稿重投,不知道结局会怎么样已有3人参与

May-2020

Dear Dr ###:

Your manuscript entitled "。。。。" which you submitted to 。。。, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.

I regret to inform you that the reviewers have raised serious concerns, and therefore your paper cannot be accepted for publication in ****. However since the reviewers do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns.

Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review before a decision is rendered.

You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript.  Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to ###, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission.

I look forward to a resubmission.

Sincerely,
Dr ###
Editor in Chief, ;;;;

This paper should be rejected. It is written carelessly. Figure *: can not see anything, can not even read the scale bar. (实际能看清,只是有些模糊)

What is shown in Figure 2. I really can not tell. There are various grey shades. What are they. (原图比较模糊)

References are in the wrong format.

Author gives black and white figures and suddenly switches to the colored figures. Why?

For the print version of the paper, we do not accept colored figures.

Add references suggested by one of the reviewers.
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
Dear Sir
                I appreciate your research on ###. good luck.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
This article discusses the 。。。。 by various processes, including ####. As much, the matter is of interest. However, there exist many small problems.
1.        In “Introduction” part, lines ¥¥¥ are the basic principles of @@@, the author should be deleted.
2.        In “@@@” part, the ** contains @ and @@ methods and the author only presents the main reactions of @ method.
3.        In addition to the #, what is the difference between the !! and the %?
4.        In “##” part, DD procedures were taken into consideration to %%, and in the …………, why not consider other ¥¥¥?



Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
In the current review manuscript, authors have attempted to review the research updates on the ¥¥¥. The review article is well written with ***. However, the review looks like very large and needs to be shorten further. Author may agree that there are several article on review on &&&. So, effort need to be made for the revision of the article to make it accept in this journal through better interpretation using ***. The paper needs a revision on the %. The article should revise based on the comments raised and request to revise the review article accordingly. However, there are a few points mentioned below which need to be addressed before publication:
•        ***
下边有十来条意见,其中有一些比较笼统,像大致该按何种方式写等,并且看出来这个专家不是我们领域的(相近领域),因为他提的修改有几条不是那么切题,另列出了十来篇文献让引用(基本都是这个刊物的),感觉审稿意见也算是正面,不知道编辑为啥拒稿,这个重投好好修改不知道接收几率有多大,
PS:图像问题较大,很多图片都改了,连着几天个弄得迷迷糊糊的,但愿能有好运吧,今年预测该刊影响力飙升。。。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

Nothingimpossible!!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

minime86

金虫 (小有名气)

好好改,希望很大
精神病人思维广,弱智儿童快乐多
2楼2020-06-01 14:50:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gxq666

银虫 (正式写手)

不用管,不是拒稿就往si了干,必中

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2020-06-01 17:50:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
4楼2020-06-01 21:45:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lkd-syl 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 关于FS01和FS02的某种解答 +15 Coka_绵绵 2020-07-07 16/800 2020-07-09 08:41 by 铁笔文
[公派出国] 海外申请 法国csc公派合作项目还是在审核的状态 +5 KimWG 2020-07-08 16/800 2020-07-09 00:19 by 言寺言寺
[考博] 读博读的怀疑自己的价值观 +13 科研白菜 2020-07-07 14/700 2020-07-08 18:31 by Reek buddy
[有机交流] 酚类物质的盐酸盐氢化釜材质的选择 100+3 lk20120323 2020-07-08 3/150 2020-07-08 16:12 by 林建国
[论文投稿] 投稿求助 +6 巴萨12138 2020-07-07 6/300 2020-07-08 14:21 by 差不多,先森
[考博] 二战考博结束 +17 糯米12345 2020-07-07 22/1100 2020-07-08 14:14 by 17661212
[找工作] 有业余时间无聊,想要辅导留学生的嘛 +3 wushuikeke 2020-07-07 7/350 2020-07-08 10:56 by wushuikeke
[考博] 连续三年考博失败 +36 minato754 2020-07-05 48/2400 2020-07-07 15:03 by 冰血羽
[考博] 武大博士! +6 jqq123456 2020-07-06 8/400 2020-07-06 23:21 by qq511803459
[硕博家园] 突然有点害怕博士没办法毕业 +7 城口的木匠 2020-07-02 9/450 2020-07-06 23:05 by flyingair007
[公派出国] 欧洲合作项目时间 +10 li19901216 2020-07-06 15/750 2020-07-06 16:15 by netease3854
[论文投稿] 投稿 +11 kaistudy 2020-07-03 14/700 2020-07-06 08:53 by 期待成长
[教师之家] 小诗:仲夏,刷新认知 +30 翅影成诗 2020-07-05 71/3550 2020-07-06 07:20 by 尘轩无梦
[计算模拟] MS安装激活失败,出现这种状况 +3 文方2016 2020-07-04 4/200 2020-07-05 16:31 by 沸石先生
[教师之家] 遇到不诚信的研究生报考者怎么办 +69 理想还有多远 2020-07-03 95/4750 2020-07-05 13:58 by V1123
[论文投稿] 求问大家二审with editor都花了多少时间 +7 学痞陳 2020-07-04 8/400 2020-07-04 22:46 by 学痞陳
[考博] 求博导带走,中科院地图学与地理信息系统考博调剂 +5 云月阁 2020-07-03 7/350 2020-07-04 13:26 by lxl315
[硕博家园] 到底去不去中科院联培 +22 我有一朵花 2020-07-02 32/1600 2020-07-04 09:09 by 28555
[硕博家园] 资料求助 +3 Star_W0 2020-07-04 3/150 2020-07-04 07:22 by 星辰危险了
[考博] 哈工大(深圳)的工程博士值不值得读 +15 小圆style 2020-07-02 31/1550 2020-07-03 09:39 by 小圆style
信息提示
请填处理意见