|
[求助]
审稿意见中关于晶体解析的问题已有1人参与
各位虫友,我年前投了篇文章,里边有四个晶体,最近收到了审稿人的意见,看来这个审稿人是做晶体解析的,提的问题好专业。本人对晶体解析一窍不通,不知道审稿人说的啥,我把审稿人的意见发出来,请帮忙参谋参谋审稿人想让我干啥。感谢感谢!
1. -not mentioning the primary and secondary structure solution strategies
2. -there are three structure which were apparently not corrected at all for absorption, which probably led to "interesting" weighting schemes - please use an absorption correction.
3. -I'm not entirely sure whether the long list of OMIT instructions for certain reflections add much to the trustworthiness of the structures. If they are not associated with beam stop or cutoff effects, or cannot otherwise be rationalised, you may be washing out features in the residual map rather than improving the refinements. I haven't done a re-refinement on the structures, but this is something that should be commented on.
4. -In general, head the warnings from CIFCheck, and comment on them in the paper how they were checked and why they cannot be resolved. |
|