24小时热门版块排行榜     论文翻译意得辑论文润色直减288再抽iPad

查看: 500  |  回复: 10
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者WORKDAY将赠送您 5 个金币

WORKDAY

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 审稿人意见major revision,改后重投悲剧,如何申诉?已有6人参与

各位同僚,在投稿BMC nephrology 之后两位审稿人给的意见都是major revision,后责编回信reject但是提出:如果可以point by point回复审稿意见,欢迎我们resubmit a new manuscript,按照责编的要求一一修改后resubmit,可是一个月后责编回信拒掉了,也没送审。我勒个去,这种情况有经验的同志指导一下,我是该申诉呢还是该申诉呢?责编为啥没送审直接拒掉了?下附信件内容:
第一次责编回信的内容:Peer review of your manuscript is now complete and, based on the reports, I am sorry to say that we cannot consider the manuscript for publication at this time.

We think it may be possible to revise your manuscript to address these comments but that this would require longer than our standard revision period. However, we are willing to consider your manuscript further once all the concerns have been addressed. Therefore, if you are able to address all of these concerns, please do submit a new manuscript to BMC Nephrology. If you are able to do this, a full covering letter, explaining the revisions made, should accompany the submission.

Their reports, together with any other comments, are below. Please also take a moment to check our website at https://www.editorialmanager.com/bnep/ for any additional comments that were saved as attachments. Please note that as BMC Nephrology has a policy of open peer review, you will be able to see the names of the reviewers.

If you can address all of these concerns raised, please do submit a new manuscript to https://www.editorialmanager.com/bnep/.

We request that a point-by-point response letter accompanies your revised manuscript. This letter must provide a detailed response to each reviewer/editorial point raised, describing what amendments have been made to the manuscript text and where these can be found (e.g. Methods section, line 12, page 5). Please also ensure that all changes to the manuscript are indicated in the text by highlighting or using track changes. If you disagree with any comments raised, please provide a detailed rebuttal to help explain and justify your decision.
Please note that this decision applies across the BMC-series journals (http://www.biomedcentral.com/authors/bmcseries#journallist). Therefore, if you were to submit your revised manuscript to another journal within the BMC series, your submission should also be accompanied by a full covering letter.

I wish you every success with your research and hope that you will consider us again in the f

第二次责编回信内容:
Editor\'s comments:
The paper is useful but not of practical assistance. A sudden progression of renal dysfunction in patients with CKD already on a nephrotoxic chronic medication will always require a search for any reversible etiology.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

bobvan

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-12-12 22:02:14
估计编辑对你的改动不满意。可以换个期刊投。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

不要迷恋哥,哥只是一传说...
4楼2019-12-12 02:20:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

zhangjiangbo

金虫 (正式写手)

重新上传,这种情况大部分是坑,最好直接改投

发自小木虫Android客户端
2楼2019-12-11 22:20:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuze2125051

木虫 (著名写手)

3楼2019-12-11 23:07:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aaa45688123

新虫 (职业作家)

拒稿,欢迎以新稿重投,这种基本就是客气客气,你还当真了

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2019-12-12 08:02:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

WORKDAY

新虫 (初入文坛)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by bobvan at 2019-12-12 02:20:02
估计编辑对你的改动不满意。可以换个期刊投。

谢谢

发自小木虫IOS客户端
6楼2019-12-12 12:24:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhl2008

铜虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
这种都是因为编辑对文章无感

发自手机版WAP
有志者事竟成
7楼2019-12-12 12:35:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

碧海红树

铁虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
同样的经历,按照编辑意见重新投forests直接给 拒了。。。。。。。
好好学习,努力科研
8楼2019-12-12 14:59:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lhkitty

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-12-12 22:02:36
重新换个期刊投吧,你们改的没有达到编辑的要求,我上次投了一篇,也是拒了,让重投,重投后经过三审接收了。祝你好运。
9楼2019-12-12 16:09:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lansong9783

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
我之前经历过,很多时候取决于你的回复,是否回复了关键问题和绝大部分问题。这个时候再去rebate不合适,换杂志吧。
10楼2019-12-13 14:45:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 WORKDAY 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[论文投稿] 文章被拒三次,生活无望想跳楼了 +58 阿贤hh 2020-01-28 73/3650 2020-01-29 20:24 by 舒天朝辉
[公派出国] 面一个凉一个哭唧唧 +15 AAAir酱 2020-01-28 25/1250 2020-01-29 19:59 by Mussaluk
[考博] 博士学校重要还是文章档次更重要? +20 贾先森啦啦啦 2020-01-27 25/1250 2020-01-29 19:16 by lanmulan
[硕博家园] 博导为什么那么牛 +44 落花如雨666 2020-01-28 68/3400 2020-01-29 19:00 by 泽林 冷Z
[教师之家] 《我和我的祖国》中的7个故事,哪个给你印象最深? (金币+2) +6 淡如水2012 2020-01-27 6/300 2020-01-29 18:28 by 小葱子Vic
[公派出国] 访问学者提前回国 +39 bestxiangyu 2020-01-27 63/3150 2020-01-29 17:27 by 344081554
[硕博家园] 好想回学校 +20 我是六甲 2020-01-28 21/1050 2020-01-29 16:13 by Kimlulu
[考博] 大年初一给报考的博导发了祝福语,至今没回,是不是没戏了? +18 融合 2020-01-27 23/1150 2020-01-29 15:05 by 樱莺
[医学] 新型冠状病毒多少米以外安全? +18 诸葛月英 2020-01-25 18/900 2020-01-29 14:27 by highpy
[考博] 学校一般,导师还行,值得读吗? +11 lala_fairy 2020-01-27 14/700 2020-01-29 12:09 by 狮子做的猫
[论文投稿] 拒绝审稿,需要写理由吗? +6 孤独前行007 2020-01-27 7/350 2020-01-29 11:07 by 229118
[仿真模拟] 百度网盘资源资源 +7 百搭鸡蛋酱 2020-01-24 12/600 2020-01-29 00:17 by fy8670
[教师之家] 江苏和辽宁教育实力哪个强? +7 小李子下海 2020-01-27 8/400 2020-01-28 18:57 by hf6391964
[基金申请] 专家支招:优秀SCI 缺乏频添堵的解决办法 +3 nanobiom 2020-01-24 5/250 2020-01-28 18:47 by nanobiom
[硕博家园] 是地方985大学博士好还是中科院不知名研究院的博士好呢? +10 Monica0-0 2020-01-25 10/500 2020-01-26 20:54 by smithson
[教师之家] 讨论个人生问题哈,大学老师vs高职老师,哪个工作轻松? +3 没羽箭张清 2020-01-23 6/300 2020-01-25 14:27 by fqcgfqcgfqcg
[论文投稿] engineering structures 已经ready for decision 11天了 +5 海宝心声 2020-01-23 7/350 2020-01-25 08:14 by qiansuihan
[基金申请] 青年基金可以提前结题吗? +5 sigurid 2020-01-23 9/450 2020-01-24 14:21 by Zed-jie
[留学DIY] 研二211小硕弱背景求定位 +4 Rashford 2020-01-23 14/700 2020-01-24 09:34 by 小橙子LV5
[硕博家园] 2020加油 +3 yafutang 2020-01-22 3/150 2020-01-23 15:48 by zyqchem
信息提示
请填处理意见