投了science of the total environment,哪位大神帮帮小妹啊,编辑就说我回复评审的格式不对,到底什么格式才对啊?或者哪位大神能给我一份你的投稿后返回期刊生成的PDF让我参考参考呀!❤❤
第一次返回修改稿和给评审的回信后,编辑意见说格式不对,要做到:⑤ The response to reviewers comments document should follow the format given in the manuscript website. You need to initially list each reviewer comment and then provide the detailed response to each comment individually. If any changes are undertaken in the manuscript in response to a comment, the exact correction undertaken should be repeated (cut-and-paste the revision undertaken) after the reviewer comment including the location in the manuscript (line and page number). Just confirming that you attended to a comment is not sufficient. ⑦ As far as possible (and within reason) your responses should not be solely directed to the reviewer. Your responses could also be of interest to potential readers of your manuscript. Accordingly, your responses should also entail revisions to the manuscript itself incorporating these responses. Therefore, the appropriate correction undertaken in the manuscript should be repeated after the reviewer comment and including the location in the manuscript (line and page number).⑧ Please do not use track changes, but highlight the changes undertaken in the manuscript.
~~~~~~但是我的确是先把4个评审的意见都放在Word里,然后对第1个评审每一条意见都有回复,有修改的就粘贴了修改过的原文,还标明了页码,行号,也对编辑意见每一条都回复了~~~~~~
然后第二次返回修改稿和给评审的回信后,编辑意见还说,如果我没理解第一次他说的意见⑤⑦⑧,最好找个母语是英语的人帮我看看,还发来一段话:In the preparation of the response to reviewers comments document, you need to: (a) initially list each reviewer comment individually; (b) then provide the detailed response to each comment individually; (c) if any changes are undertaken in the manuscript in response to a comment, the exact correction undertaken should be repeated (cut-and-paste from the manuscript the revision undertaken) after the reviewer comment including the location in the manuscript (line and page number); (d) Just confirming that you attended to a comment is not sufficient.
我都是按照他的要求来的呀,为什么总说格式不对呢? |