| 查看: 2157 | 回复: 10 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者pluswalker将赠送您 50 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
Applied energy投稿被拒，请大家帮忙分析一下，不知如何修改，请各位虫友支招已有2人参与
|
||
|
While your submission is of interest to Applied Energy, your manuscript does not meet the following criteria, we are returning the manuscript to you before the review: *Lack of scientific originality/novelty: The novelty/originality shall be justified by highlighting that the manuscript contains sufficient contributions to the new body of knowledge. The knowledge gap needs to be clearly addressed in Introduction. *Literature survey is not sufficient to present the most updated R&D status for further justification of the originality of the manuscript. You should carry out a thorough literature survey of papers published in a range of top energy journals in the last three/four years so as to fully appreciate the latest findings and key challenges relating to the topic addressed in your manuscript and to allow you to more clearly present your contributions to the pool of existing knowledge. In the case the subject is really novel and few or no specific references are found, the novelty of the subject, the methodology used and the similarity to other older or newer subjects should be explicitly addressed. At this time, your submission will be rejected from Applied Energy but please feel free to re-submit to the journal once the aforementioned comments have been addressed. 不知道如何对该文章进行修改？谢谢各位虫友们！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
刚博士毕业，入职普通一本高校
已经有19人回复
-
催稿后秒拒
已经有12人回复
-
取博导收留
已经有8人回复
-
25年博士申请
已经有5人回复
-
Nature一直在编辑手里，考虑好几天了，是悬了吗
已经有11人回复
-
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有11人回复
-
召集青年编委
已经有9人回复
-
博士论文被抄袭
已经有39人回复
-
期末给学生划重点都是什么话术啊
已经有18人回复
-
with editor 两个月了，什么原因？
已经有8人回复
2楼2019-11-02 12:29:29
9楼2019-11-02 14:21:47
5