| 查看: 2704 | 回复: 13 | |||
[交流]
IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析
|
|||
大家好~第一次投稿，编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投，两个接收，还有一个拒绝（意见很尖锐 ），大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers（第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..）下面是三位审稿人的意见： Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically... Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index. The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these code comments. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit) Comments: It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: It is a well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches. Thus, it deserves to ve published. Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed. Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic. Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory. 又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见，我好气哦，感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
Chemical Engineering Journal投稿3周了，一直显示With editor状态。这是送审了吗？
已经有10人回复
-
0854－0855调剂
已经有10人回复
-
南京大学-广州大学联合招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有11人回复
-
召集青年编委
已经有6人回复
-
申博求助
已经有8人回复
-
Nature一直在编辑手里，考虑好几天了，是悬了吗
已经有7人回复
-
博士生招生！！
已经有5人回复
-
国社科项目，你们学校都限额申报吗？
已经有8人回复
-
企业博后是否能申请CSC博士后项目？谢谢
已经有6人回复
-
博士白读了
已经有40人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
国家优青团队招收2024年第二批博士研究生（有机/高分子光电材料合成）
+2/166
-
中科院（北京）土壤生态过程与生态重建研究组特别研究助理（博士后）招聘启事
+1/97
-
中科院南京地理与湖泊研究所招收联培生、实习生和聘用人员（长期有效）
+1/88
-
南方科技大学招聘行政助理
+1/82
-
python处理复杂文本数据的库，附带处理样例
+1/82
-
恭喜老弟以第一作者发表三大顶刊文章！！！！
+1/73
-
国科温州研究院 项目聘用有意“二战”的优秀本科毕业生
+1/70
-
90后男北京真诚征婚 (征到即删，长期有效)
+1/60
-
北航工程热物理、航空工程与环境团队招聘博后
+1/33
-
博士后招聘-燃料电池方向。合同一年开始，可更新。
+2/32
-
211博后出站求职，第一性原理+分子动力学+机器学习力场开发
+1/32
-
大湾区大学（筹）-中国科学技术大学联合招聘物理方向博士后
+2/30
-
专业提供SEM-EDS/NMR/FTIR/DSC/TGA/DMA/TMA/GCMS 加扣870 559 66
+1/21
-
土木工程岩土类申博
+1/10
-
国家杰青、长江学者张卫东教授课题组招收科研助理启事
+1/7
-
先进复合材料力学与智能制造团队招聘：研究助理教授、博士后、科研助理（长期有效）
+1/5
-
中国科学院海洋研究所海洋生物制品课题组招聘“博士后”
+1/5
-
青岛大学李强教授课题组2024年博士招生
+1/5
-
东北林业大学招收2024年“少数民族高层次骨干人才”专项计划博士研究生-催化化学方向
+1/3
-
【网络研讨会】4月25日浅谈电化学专业发展与就业分析！
+1/2
+2/166
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我有一个审稿人直接拒稿不接受重投 只说了一句文章缺乏创新 其他三个审稿人接受小的修改 编辑给的拒稿重投 我回应了每一个审稿人 包括拒稿不鼓励重投的 在cover letter中写明是否可以更换拒稿的审稿人 其实编辑在邮件中也说了 可以考虑是否更换审稿人 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
12楼2019-10-28 07:26:43
13楼2019-12-29 09:53:38
14楼2020-01-28 14:55:38
简单回复
一品哥哥2楼
2019-10-27 17:32
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， 发自小木虫Android客户端
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
超级老快4楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
nono20095楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
·
tzynew7楼
2019-10-27 18:00
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-10-27 18:33
回复
