|
[交流]
编辑reject,是否需要回复编辑该邮件,并按审稿人意见修改后重投该杂志吗?
昨夜收到执行编辑的邮件,
“I regret to inform you that the reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication, and I must therefore reject it.”
两个审稿人的意见,一个是“For the reasons stated above, I cannot recommend the acceptance of this paper.”,另一位认为可转投其他刊物“Consequently, the characterization of this new … can represent a first contribution to the knowledge in the field. The analytical approach is adequate and the work can be evaluated as a preliminary report. …,Substantial 'tightening' of the syntax and more precision are required in this respect. Based on these comments, and some specific comments below, taking into account the high quality standards of xxx Journal, in my opinion the manuscript is suitable for publication in another journal after major revision.”
编辑给的reject,当初审稿流程是投稿当天分配执行编辑with editor,3天后under review,7天后current state变为completed-reject,final disposition为reject,并收到执行编辑的reject决定
请问我应立刻回复执行编辑的邮件吗,
这个杂志一审周期三个月左右,感觉送外审很快,如果我给执行编辑写信表示按审稿人意见(给的很详细的修改意见,第一位审稿人说有若干实验内容缺乏,其实有部分认为缺的实验我投稿前已经是做了的,因文章篇幅限制,手稿字数已超了少许,完全没法再塞进文章),另感觉编辑部送外审的速度奇快,且没有技术审查阶段要修改文章格式什么的,从reject决定的语气看,是不是送外审时有接受文章的那么一点倾向?
那么我可以按审稿人意见仔细修改文章、把缺的实验数据补进文章后,重新投稿该杂志吗?
是否需要现在就给编辑写信说明这个想法,还是应该先修改完文章再发信给编辑,还是修好直接重投而不回复reject信,还是应该修改后按第二审稿人意见转投其他杂志?
盼回复,谢谢各位了!
发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
|