| 查看: 767 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者医学僧僧将赠送您 8 个金币 | ||
[求助]
投稿求助已有1人参与
|
||
|
七月底投的BMC infectious diseases,一周后回信说有重复，建议修改后重投，8月14重投，8.27送审，今天收到被拒的稿件，第一个编辑拒的很干脆，提出的问题也很专业，第二个编辑认为还可以，需要修一修，主编直接给的拒绝，各位大神看看，改一改重投还有机会不？附部分原文 Dear Professor Zhao, Thank you for considering BMC Infectious Diseases for your manuscript.Peer review of your manuscript is now complete and, based on the reports, I am sorry to say that we cannot consider the manuscript for publication and are closing your file. The reviewers' reports are included at the end of this email. Please note that as BMC Infectious Diseases has a policy of open peer review, you will be able to see the names of the reviewers. I wish you every success with your research and hope that you will consider us again in the future. Best wishes, Mar Masiá, MD, PhD BMC Infectious Diseases https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/ Editor Comments: Reviewer reports: Jesús Bermejo-Martín (Reviewer 1): This paper present a combined score formed by A,B and C to improve mortality prediction . This work present major flaws and defects in the design. - Relative novelty: The paper shows a very similar approach to that already published in PMID: 28958655, By the way, this paper is not cited iby the authors.? - A is a biomarker denoting severity in those infections of bacterial origin. The authors do not present any data on the bacterial or viral By the way, this paper is not cited iby the authors.? In definitive, The authors should address this drawback in the future.? Minor comments: Further details on how the authors constructed the combined scores should be provided in the methodology. Ito Akihiro (Reviewer 2): Reviewer comments I think that this study is interesting and significant, however, I think that there are some important points to be revised. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
想问一下有没有需要文章但是没时间带学生的研究生导师。
已经有18人回复
-
颜宁:基础研究应顶天立地,立地即从需求端作为问题的出发点,立项背景就是面向真实需求
已经有3人回复
-
发现督导在听课，需要跟TA招呼示意吗？有同学看手机、课件有疏漏算大问题吗？
已经有4人回复
-
催稿后秒拒
已经有6人回复
-
前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然，现在基金委发来调查函
已经有10人回复
-
298求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
申请省自然科学基金，研究区能否是省外区域
已经有13人回复
-
国内科研环境差导致国内科研水平差的根源
已经有3人回复
-
CSC在职申请求问
已经有7人回复
-
家乡二本高校/沿海传统私企，如何抉择？
已经有15人回复
2楼2019-09-30 09:06:20
3楼2019-09-30 09:07:48
4楼2019-09-30 10:12:23
100
