【调剂】北京石油化工学院2024年16个专业接受调剂
查看: 4491  |  回复: 26
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

amzpotato

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 审稿大修已有15人参与

大家好,新人一枚!一个月前投了一个期刊,审稿意见为大修,编辑信如下。给了3个月时间修改,第一个审稿人提了很多充实论文的意见,这种情况修改后悲剧的可能性大吗?还有我大概修改多久提交比较好呢?跪求各位大佬帮俺解答一下。
A revised version of your manuscript that takes into account the comments of the referee(s) will be reconsidered for publication.

Please note that submitting a revision of your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your revision may be subject to re-review by the referee(s) before a decision is rendered.

You can upload your revised manuscript and submit it through your Author Center. Log into https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ima  and enter your Author Center, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions".

When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the referee(s) in the space provided.  You can use this space to document any changes you make to the original manuscript.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology and I look forward to receiving your revision.

Sincerely,

Dr Mohamed Seghier
Editor, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
imaeditorial@wiley.com


Referee(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewing: 1

Comments to the Author
1- Some important and novel techniquse are missing in the literature part.
-Gu, Z., Cheng, J., Fu, H., Zhou, K., Hao, H., Zhao, Y., ... & Liu, J. (2019). CE-Net: Context Encoder Network for 2D Medical Image Segmentation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging.
-Öztürk S¸, Akdemir B. Celltype based semantic segmentation of histopathological images using deep convolutional neural networks. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2019;1 13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22309
2- The most important contribution of this study is upsampling of feture maps. Authors have to show this at the figure 1. Figure 1 is unclear
3- What is the motivation of Xcception block? What is the formulation of Xception block?
4- Section 2.2 has to be explained detailed.
5- Section 2.3 has to be explained detailed.  (Authors has to explain their parameters, their contribution, the different part of their methods in Section 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
6- Section 2.4 is not clear. Authors has to add figure.
7- TP, FN,FP explanations are generic. Authors have to explained these parameters according to their data.
8- Further research on the effects of network depth should be done and the results should be added.
9- Computational complexity should be added.
10- Visual comparison results should be added as a new figure.
11- More state-of-the-art algorithm results can be added.


Reviewing: 2

Comments to the Author
This paper conducted gliomas segmentation using multi-scale 3D Unet. To enhance the accuracy of segmentation masks, multi-scale features, 3D U-net with separable convolution block, and multi-pooling blocks were utilized. Performance was validated by comparison to multiple previous techniques using Dice, sensitivity, and PPV.

The manuscript is well written. But, I have a few inquiries and suggestions to improve this manuscript.

1. Table 2 shows the improvement of segmentation masks with respect to each component of your network, such as the convolution block, and pooling. Can you show the differences of segmentation masks according to each component?

2. Table 3 shows that the performance of the proposed method is less accurate than other methods. Can you explain other advantages of your technique (ex. number of parameters or FLOPs) in result and discussion section?

3. Table 3 shows that the proposed method can produce an accurate segmentation mask in whole but not in core and Enh. Can you discuss the reason for these results?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
8楼2019-06-18 23:23:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 27 个回答

冬瓜涂涂

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我觉得问题不大,一个月左右提交完全可以

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2019-06-18 21:20:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zkczhyzr

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
让你改就说明有戏,一条条改

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2019-06-18 21:20:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)


本帖仅楼主可见
4楼2019-06-18 21:22:08
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 申博成果界定是根据Jcr分区还是中科院分区 +4 我属驴核动力驴 2024-04-22 4/200 2024-04-23 12:18 by lyfbangong
[基金申请] 颜宁:基础研究应顶天立地,立地即从需求端作为问题的出发点,立项背景就是面向真实需求 +10 zju2000 2024-04-18 10/500 2024-04-23 11:46 by 稻花香
[考博] 真的好想读博! +5 wangzhe_bs 2024-04-22 6/300 2024-04-23 11:00 by lizhiweiouc
[电化学] 有偿收购废弃锂硫电池 +3 汤圆喵 2024-04-19 5/250 2024-04-23 10:41 by Happy C
[基金申请] 前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然,现在基金委发来调查函 +26 bjdxyxy 2024-04-19 40/2000 2024-04-23 09:38 by bjdlqz
[论文投稿] Chemical Engineering Journal投稿3周了,一直显示With editor状态。这是送审了吗? 10+3 yifeng11 2024-04-20 7/350 2024-04-23 09:29 by bobvan
[教师之家] 刚博士毕业,入职普通一本高校 +16 保持肌肤 2024-04-20 16/800 2024-04-23 08:31 by zxf984
[博后之家] 南京大学-广州大学联合招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才!!! +3 黑魔变身啾 2024-04-20 6/300 2024-04-23 08:01 by dodonaomi
[硕博家园] 考研,求职还是考编? +9 xizj 2024-04-21 17/850 2024-04-23 06:38 by lizhiweiouc
[论文投稿] 一直找不到审稿人 +4 lizhengke06 2024-04-21 5/250 2024-04-22 23:37 by topedit
[论文投稿] 无under review,直接DIP,咋么办。 +9 lizhengke06 2024-04-19 15/750 2024-04-22 17:18 by lizhengke06
[高分子] 请问UV灯是365nm的,那么选光引发剂的波长选多少的?要完全一致吗? +4 engledd2004 2024-04-21 4/200 2024-04-22 16:08 by wangcz23
[教师之家] 期末给学生划重点都是什么话术啊 +13 luokereng 2024-04-20 14/700 2024-04-22 14:58 by luokereng
[访问学者] CSC的访问学者申请,没有个评审意见,也不知道怎么改,还有必要申请吗 +3 flyingship 2024-04-20 3/150 2024-04-22 13:52 by louistom_521
[基金申请] 国社科项目,你们学校都限额申报吗? +5 屡战屡败 2024-04-21 7/350 2024-04-22 13:03 by 屡战屡败
[考研] 博士生招生!! +3 2458827884 2024-04-19 3/150 2024-04-22 12:37 by 钰波love
[基金申请] 估计今年青基又没戏 +11 忆念7 2024-04-18 11/550 2024-04-20 17:29 by mygod_nju
[论文投稿] 最近遇到这样一个问题 +4 asd123gfa689 2024-04-18 10/500 2024-04-19 18:57 by asd123gfa689
[考博] 24/25读博求博导 +4 宝23 2024-04-16 4/200 2024-04-19 17:18 by wangzhe_bs
[有机交流] 紫外光谱 50+3 54胡 2024-04-17 3/150 2024-04-19 10:48 by Nanamiwww
信息提示
请填处理意见