| 查看: 784 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者yuanye2010将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
yuanye2010金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
SCI二审大修意见如下，三审半个月变Ready for decision，当天又变成 Decision Pending
|
|
|
三审半个月变成Ready for decision，当天又变成 Decision Pending！！求师兄师姐分析下结果！谢谢 要靠他毕业！ 二审追加了两次审稿人后四个审稿人意见如下： Associate Editor There are different opinions about this paper. The contributions of the paper remain unclear. The comparison with [29] should be justified. Simulation results need better organization and elaborations. A chance is provided to the authors to justify the work and additional reviewers may be assigned. Reviewer 1 The contributions of the paper are not clearly presented. The significance of the proposed work as compared to [29] should be justified. Reviewer 2 This paper proposes a distributed algorithm for the economic dispatch problem (EDP). It mainly studies the stochastic gradient-push method with asynchronous step-size and noisy gradient to deal with the finite delays in time-varying directed communication network of EDP. The author shows nice mathematical skills in presenting the results. However, the reviewer has to raise some questions about the model and algorithm in this study: 1. Why not to include ramp-up and ramp-down limit constraint for units in the EDP model? Is the proposed algorithm applicable for an EDP model with time coupling constraints? 2. The author should indicate the difference or improvement of the proposed algorithm in this study compared with reference [29]. 3. In introduction, the author mentioned ‘This work adopts asynchronous step-size, which provides a more flexible range for step-size.’ However, the advantage of asynchronous step-size is well displayed in Section 5. 4. Numerical results in Section 5 should be simplified or reorganized. The author can just take one test system to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in detail (for instance, 4-bus system). Moreover, comparison results between different cases are recommended to present in a table format for a better display. Reviewer 3 I have no further comments. Reviewer 4 The revised paper can be accepted by minor revisions. 1. Please give the name, unit of the vertical coordinates for figures. 2. The literature review is not sufficient. Please refer to：3篇参考文献 爱斯维尔这个这次接收的纪律大吗？？？已经 Decision Pending ！谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
Chemical Engineering Journal投稿3周了，一直显示With editor状态。这是送审了吗？
已经有11人回复
-
"颜宁:基础研究应顶天立地"能做到基础研究同时顶天立地的才是牛人
已经有4人回复
-
普通院校药学硕士，做合成的，感觉找不到工作
已经有15人回复
-
申博求助
已经有10人回复
-
Nature一直在编辑手里，考虑好几天了，是悬了吗
已经有12人回复
-
刚博士毕业，入职普通一本高校
已经有19人回复
-
催稿后秒拒
已经有12人回复
-
取博导收留
已经有8人回复
-
25年博士申请
已经有5人回复
-
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有11人回复
mxnjfu
新虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 9890.9
- 散金: 3500
- 红花: 80
- 帖子: 7985
- 在线: 257.1小时
- 虫号: 471628
- 注册: 2007-12-02
- 专业: 环境工程
2楼2019-05-21 00:50:49
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2019-05-21 01:58:33
路过此地
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1253.5
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 480
- 在线: 34.2小时
- 虫号: 3116619
- 注册: 2014-04-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光谱分析
4楼2019-05-22 01:15:50
10
