| 查看: 4908 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
ceramics international已有9人参与
|
|||
|
最近在ceramics international上投了一篇文章，经过一次大修后审稿人认为再次修改后可以接收，修完稿后编辑认为内容已经达到要求，语言存在问题需要进行润色，在我润色完后提交后，编辑直接reject，要求重新投稿，昨天晚上到现在一直是with editor,请各位大神帮我分析分析这是怎么回事？ （第二次审稿意见）The reviewer has commented on your above paper and indicated that it is acceptable for publication with some corrections. I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript carefully addressing the issues raised in the reviewer's comments (included below). Although the scientuific content of the revised paper may be acceptable, language needs to be revised as before advisd to authors. Just two examples from abstract: "The aim of this examination was to discuss.." shall be "The aim of this paper is to discuss".. "as well as an increase in resistant hydrothermal stability with" shall be "as well as an increase in hydrothermal stability with" Authors are again advised to have their paper fully revised for language by an official technical editing agency. （第三次审稿意见）Language has been revised. Now please resubmit the whole revised paper as a new submission without showing corrections in colour. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
下雨了
已经有19人回复
-
院士建议：对勇于提出解决卡脖子问题新解决方案的学者加大资助力度
已经有8人回复
-
小孩7岁，上一年级，不自信，学习较差
已经有30人回复
-
CCS Chemistry投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
求助
已经有3人回复
-
SCI 评审意见回复 模板
已经有4人回复
-
国家重点研发计划论文可以发MDPI里的期刊吗
已经有4人回复
-
国自然青年基金只有一篇能第一标注，其他都是第二标注能结题吗？
已经有6人回复
-
兄弟们帮我看看这两个结构怎么合成
已经有5人回复
-
一审一个审稿人，小修，会怎么样呀？
已经有6人回复
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
4楼2018-12-07 22:56:19
15