| 查看: 1349 | 回复: 13 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者可爱洁将赠送您 14 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
求理解审稿意见已有1人参与
|
||
|
文章已被拒。第一次投稿，而且催化学的比较浅，希望能得到虫友们的指导。The Authors have responded to most of the questions and made some improvements in the manuscript. They have repeated the RRDE measurements using higher ring potential in acidic solution, but the data in alkaline solution is still the same as in previous version. In case the ring potential was 0.897 V, as stated in the previous version, the RRDE experiments should be redone also in alkaline solution. 1. The RRDE experiments should be carried out in alkaline solution using the ring potential at which the peroxide reduction is diffusion-limited (usually about 1.2 V vs RHE is used in alkaline solution). In case the ring potential was 0.897 V, as stated in the previous version, then there should rather be a small oxygen reduction current at the ring and not H2O2 oxidation current. The RRDE results should also be more clearly presented by selecting the appropriate current density scale for the ring current (Fig. 5a). 2. Page 1, col 1, line 18; p3, col 2, line 19; Table S1. The onset potential for BN-CA-900 was 0.05 vs Hg/HgO in the previous versions. As the potential was converted to RHE scale as E(RHE) = E(Hg/HgO) +0.86V, it should be 0.91 V vs RHE after conversion and not 0.93 V. Also the other values in Table S1 should be re-checked. 3. Page 3, col. 2, line 39. The potential range of the stability tests was given as -0.8 ... 0.2 V (vs. Hg/HgO) in previous versions, but in this version it is 0.2 ... 1.0 V (vs. RHE). Unless the Authors really did the new stability tests in a new range, the range should be converted exacly using the conversion value given (+0.86 V). 4. Fig.7b. It is not meaningful to present the data at the potentials more positive than the onset potential of ORR. 5. Table S2. The values of the onset potentials should be re-evaluated. It can be seen in Fig. 6 that the O2 reduction does not start at 0.75 V, but rather around 0.65 V. There seem to be a small negative current for all materials even at positive potentials, are the RDE curves background-corrected? If not, it should definitely be done, otherwise the onset potentials cannot be precisely determined. It should also be described in the Supporting Information how the onset potentials were determined. @Monash2011 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0854－0855调剂
已经有10人回复
-
南京大学-广州大学联合招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有11人回复
-
召集青年编委
已经有6人回复
-
申博求助
已经有8人回复
-
Chemical Engineering Journal投稿3周了，一直显示With editor状态。这是送审了吗？
已经有9人回复
-
Nature一直在编辑手里，考虑好几天了，是悬了吗
已经有7人回复
-
博士生招生！！
已经有5人回复
-
国社科项目，你们学校都限额申报吗？
已经有8人回复
-
企业博后是否能申请CSC博士后项目？谢谢
已经有6人回复
-
博士白读了
已经有40人回复
3楼2018-12-07 15:43:19
海誓山盟
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 46 (小学生)
- 金币: 16377.7
- 散金: 767
- 红花: 19
- 帖子: 2183
- 在线: 669.3小时
- 虫号: 1790928
- 注册: 2012-05-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 物理化学
2楼2018-12-07 15:42:56
4楼2018-12-07 15:46:15
|
是的是的，接受批评，确实是自己有问题，虽然文章被拒了，但是意识到自己什么都不懂，课题组就我一个人做这个了……导师做生物方向的，  彷佛自己就是误入催化的蛀虫发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
5楼2018-12-07 16:06:34
20