查看: 550  |  回复: 11
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者可爱洁将赠送您 14 个金币

可爱洁

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 求理解审稿意见已有1人参与

文章已被拒。第一次投稿,而且催化学的比较浅,希望能得到虫友们的指导。The Authors have responded to most of the questions and made some improvements in the manuscript. They have repeated the RRDE measurements using higher ring potential in acidic solution, but the data in alkaline solution is still the same as in previous version. In case the ring potential was 0.897 V, as stated in the previous version, the RRDE experiments should be redone also in alkaline solution.

1.        The RRDE experiments should be carried out in alkaline solution using the ring potential at which the peroxide reduction is diffusion-limited (usually about 1.2 V vs RHE is used in alkaline solution). In case the ring potential was 0.897 V, as stated in the previous version, then there should rather be a small oxygen reduction current at the ring and not H2O2 oxidation current. The RRDE results should also be more clearly presented by selecting the appropriate current density scale for the ring current (Fig. 5a).
2.        Page 1, col 1, line 18; p3, col 2, line 19; Table S1. The onset potential for BN-CA-900 was 0.05 vs Hg/HgO in the previous versions. As the potential was converted to RHE scale as E(RHE) = E(Hg/HgO) +0.86V, it should be 0.91 V vs RHE after conversion and not 0.93 V. Also the other values in Table S1 should be re-checked.
3.        Page 3, col. 2, line 39. The potential range of the stability tests was given as -0.8 ... 0.2 V (vs. Hg/HgO) in previous versions, but in this version it is 0.2 ... 1.0 V (vs. RHE). Unless the Authors really did the new stability tests in a new range, the range should be converted exacly using the conversion value given (+0.86 V).
4.        Fig.7b. It is not meaningful to present the data at the potentials more positive than the onset potential of ORR.
5.        Table S2.  The values of the onset potentials should be re-evaluated. It can be seen in Fig. 6 that the O2 reduction does not start at 0.75 V, but rather around 0.65 V. There seem to be a small negative current for all materials even at positive potentials, are the RDE curves background-corrected? If not, it should definitely be done, otherwise the onset potentials cannot be precisely determined. It should also be described in the Supporting Information how the onset potentials were determined.

@Monash2011 发自小木虫IOS客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

174184712

铁虫 (正式写手)

感觉楼主连ORR,最基本的电位换算都没做。你是不是拿了仪器就测,测了就写上啊
4楼2018-12-07 15:46:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

海誓山盟

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

快乐的坚持,乐观的坚强
2楼2018-12-07 15:42:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

可爱洁

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 海誓山盟 at 2018-12-07 15:42:56
楼主投的什么期刊啊

欧洲化学

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2018-12-07 15:43:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

可爱洁

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 174184712 at 2018-12-07 15:46:15
感觉楼主连ORR,最基本的电位换算都没做。你是不是拿了仪器就测,测了就写上啊

是的是的,接受批评,确实是自己有问题,虽然文章被拒了,但是意识到自己什么都不懂,课题组就我一个人做这个了……导师做生物方向的,彷佛自己就是误入催化的蛀虫

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2018-12-07 16:06:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ybs0809

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 174184712 at 2018-12-07 15:46:15
感觉楼主连ORR,最基本的电位换算都没做。你是不是拿了仪器就测,测了就写上啊

扎心了,老铁
6楼2018-12-07 16:06:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

youngen

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
可爱洁(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2018-12-07 18:00:44
审稿意见只是提出一些数据的问题,要是你细心点稿子就中了。以后吸取教训吧,你写文章不认真,对审稿人态度不端正,必然会给你眼色看
7楼2018-12-07 16:32:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

可爱洁

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by youngen at 2018-12-07 16:32:37
审稿意见只是提出一些数据的问题,要是你细心点稿子就中了。以后吸取教训吧,你写文章不认真,对审稿人态度不端正,必然会给你眼色看

好的好的。是这样的,我有个刚毕业的博士师兄从别的老师那里学的催化,毕竟是学生,传了好几届,到我这就是啥都不懂了,以前师兄师姐们从来都没有过转化RHE电位,就是粗糙的学会了测试。我会多看文献的,感谢回答

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2018-12-07 17:00:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

youngen

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

要不怎么叫“研究”生呢,就是什么都要学啊,“博”士内涵很丰富
9楼2018-12-07 18:01:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

174184712

铁虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 可爱洁 at 2018-12-07 16:06:34
是的是的,接受批评,确实是自己有问题,虽然文章被拒了,但是意识到自己什么都不懂,课题组就我一个人做这个了……导师做生物方向的,彷佛自己就是误入催化的蛀虫
...

他提的5个问题都很基础。我建议你最好看一下关于ORR的综述,或者谁论文做的比较全的,好的论文就别看了他们都懒的写这些问题了。你就看看JMCA上面的,上面都是堆数据,每个基础知识还反复的介绍挺清楚。。。
10楼2018-12-07 21:33:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 可爱洁 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[论文投稿] 时间都去哪儿了 +3 springhope 2018-12-15 3/150 2018-12-15 22:09 by liouzhan654
[硕博家园] 大龄未婚女硕士选择国内or国外读博 +36 Jennysky 2018-12-11 37/1850 2018-12-15 20:13 by ncomm
[硕博家园] 求战友 +16 shandong1 2018-12-09 24/1200 2018-12-15 19:21 by szwhust108
[硕博家园] 请教各位大神,氢气还原得纳米钴粉一拿到空气中就自燃,请问怎么能避免自燃呢 +5 Zhangp_sdu 2018-12-14 5/250 2018-12-15 09:07 by 一分六
[博后之家] 澳门大学博士后招聘 +3 Cici-Yu 2018-12-12 6/300 2018-12-14 21:33 by zhanghc_UM
[硕博家园] 考博!假设被学校录取了还能换其他学校吗? +6 cxl81514 2018-12-14 13/650 2018-12-14 18:19 by uwillpayit
[教师之家] [2018.12.12]最近有点儿烦,求点拨! +13 木小虫.EDU 2018-12-13 25/1250 2018-12-14 13:05 by 木小虫.EDU
[论文投稿] 有没有人在论文里致谢sci-hub的? +11 dongleixxb 2018-12-13 11/550 2018-12-14 09:00 by xiekai1991
[考博] 考博英语真题 +4 a1995 2018-12-12 5/250 2018-12-13 23:52 by 皇家小虫
[公派出国] 毕业了没有学位证,还能拿到csc资助去读博吗 +7 超级碘伏 2018-12-12 7/350 2018-12-13 19:34 by 水水123
[考研] 考研 化工专业 北京理工大学与北京化工大学哪个好 +10 心怀敬畏 2018-12-11 10/500 2018-12-13 16:30 by gaoshang11
[论文投稿] 2018中科院分区,公众号可以查了 +10 csuccy 2018-12-11 12/600 2018-12-13 15:09 by wslwydgv
[生物科学] 细胞突然出现异常死亡,求大神们看看帮忙找一下原因…… +3 XiaoShi. 2018-12-12 5/250 2018-12-13 13:36 by leoultra
[硕博家园] 就怕导师的瞎指挥 +16 薰衣草56901 2018-12-13 18/900 2018-12-13 13:28 by 奥神
[硕博家园] 想做科研,导师完全不理你咋办? +11 SempreDev 2018-12-12 16/800 2018-12-12 20:38 by SempreDev
[考博] 大连化物所博士好考吗 +15 小小幸运a 2018-12-11 21/1050 2018-12-12 15:23 by flypanzer
[论文投稿] 大修修回一个星期了,还是with editor,什么鬼 +13 爱7号的me 2018-12-10 19/950 2018-12-11 22:43 by 爱7号的me
[留学DIY] 我这种情况申直博全奖的几率大吗? +15 糯米词 2018-12-09 31/1550 2018-12-11 07:59 by 糯米词
[论文投稿] 关于毕业之后的文章 +8 可怜小胖 2018-12-09 19/950 2018-12-10 16:55 by 可怜小胖
[硕博家园] 编书 +7 旧城之眸 2018-12-09 9/450 2018-12-09 20:56 by 曾编辑
信息提示
请填处理意见