查看: 650  |  回复: 13
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者可爱洁将赠送您 14 个金币

可爱洁

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 求理解审稿意见已有1人参与

文章已被拒。第一次投稿,而且催化学的比较浅,希望能得到虫友们的指导。The Authors have responded to most of the questions and made some improvements in the manuscript. They have repeated the RRDE measurements using higher ring potential in acidic solution, but the data in alkaline solution is still the same as in previous version. In case the ring potential was 0.897 V, as stated in the previous version, the RRDE experiments should be redone also in alkaline solution.

1.        The RRDE experiments should be carried out in alkaline solution using the ring potential at which the peroxide reduction is diffusion-limited (usually about 1.2 V vs RHE is used in alkaline solution). In case the ring potential was 0.897 V, as stated in the previous version, then there should rather be a small oxygen reduction current at the ring and not H2O2 oxidation current. The RRDE results should also be more clearly presented by selecting the appropriate current density scale for the ring current (Fig. 5a).
2.        Page 1, col 1, line 18; p3, col 2, line 19; Table S1. The onset potential for BN-CA-900 was 0.05 vs Hg/HgO in the previous versions. As the potential was converted to RHE scale as E(RHE) = E(Hg/HgO) +0.86V, it should be 0.91 V vs RHE after conversion and not 0.93 V. Also the other values in Table S1 should be re-checked.
3.        Page 3, col. 2, line 39. The potential range of the stability tests was given as -0.8 ... 0.2 V (vs. Hg/HgO) in previous versions, but in this version it is 0.2 ... 1.0 V (vs. RHE). Unless the Authors really did the new stability tests in a new range, the range should be converted exacly using the conversion value given (+0.86 V).
4.        Fig.7b. It is not meaningful to present the data at the potentials more positive than the onset potential of ORR.
5.        Table S2.  The values of the onset potentials should be re-evaluated. It can be seen in Fig. 6 that the O2 reduction does not start at 0.75 V, but rather around 0.65 V. There seem to be a small negative current for all materials even at positive potentials, are the RDE curves background-corrected? If not, it should definitely be done, otherwise the onset potentials cannot be precisely determined. It should also be described in the Supporting Information how the onset potentials were determined.

@Monash2011 发自小木虫IOS客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

174184712

铁虫 (正式写手)

感觉楼主连ORR,最基本的电位换算都没做。你是不是拿了仪器就测,测了就写上啊
4楼2018-12-07 15:46:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

可爱洁

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 174184712 at 2018-12-07 15:46:15
感觉楼主连ORR,最基本的电位换算都没做。你是不是拿了仪器就测,测了就写上啊

是的是的,接受批评,确实是自己有问题,虽然文章被拒了,但是意识到自己什么都不懂,课题组就我一个人做这个了……导师做生物方向的,彷佛自己就是误入催化的蛀虫

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2018-12-07 16:06:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

youngen

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

要不怎么叫“研究”生呢,就是什么都要学啊,“博”士内涵很丰富
9楼2018-12-07 18:01:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

海誓山盟

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

快乐的坚持,乐观的坚强
2楼2018-12-07 15:42:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

可爱洁

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 海誓山盟 at 2018-12-07 15:42:56
楼主投的什么期刊啊

欧洲化学

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2018-12-07 15:43:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ybs0809

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 174184712 at 2018-12-07 15:46:15
感觉楼主连ORR,最基本的电位换算都没做。你是不是拿了仪器就测,测了就写上啊

扎心了,老铁
6楼2018-12-07 16:06:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

youngen

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
可爱洁(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2018-12-07 18:00:44
审稿意见只是提出一些数据的问题,要是你细心点稿子就中了。以后吸取教训吧,你写文章不认真,对审稿人态度不端正,必然会给你眼色看
7楼2018-12-07 16:32:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

可爱洁

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by youngen at 2018-12-07 16:32:37
审稿意见只是提出一些数据的问题,要是你细心点稿子就中了。以后吸取教训吧,你写文章不认真,对审稿人态度不端正,必然会给你眼色看

好的好的。是这样的,我有个刚毕业的博士师兄从别的老师那里学的催化,毕竟是学生,传了好几届,到我这就是啥都不懂了,以前师兄师姐们从来都没有过转化RHE电位,就是粗糙的学会了测试。我会多看文献的,感谢回答

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2018-12-07 17:00:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

174184712

铁虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 可爱洁 at 2018-12-07 16:06:34
是的是的,接受批评,确实是自己有问题,虽然文章被拒了,但是意识到自己什么都不懂,课题组就我一个人做这个了……导师做生物方向的,彷佛自己就是误入催化的蛀虫
...

他提的5个问题都很基础。我建议你最好看一下关于ORR的综述,或者谁论文做的比较全的,好的论文就别看了他们都懒的写这些问题了。你就看看JMCA上面的,上面都是堆数据,每个基础知识还反复的介绍挺清楚。。。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

10楼2018-12-07 21:33:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 可爱洁 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 考哈工大,需要的老师联系我 +10 maxiaoan 2019-02-15 12/600 2019-02-16 00:06 by maxiaoan
[考研] 要不要二战 +5 世外小木叶 2019-02-15 6/300 2019-02-15 23:38 by superceng
[留学DIY] 记一记19fall的北美PhD申请 +10 lengfeilee 2019-02-13 19/950 2019-02-15 20:22 by 1067736244
[签证指南] 今天美国签证查询网站查不到信息? +7 ascool 2019-02-11 19/950 2019-02-15 11:19 by ascool
[公派出国] 英国攻博csc申请,offer没签字还有成绩和ATAS的con,能否请外导开邀请信? +3 lhl28 2019-02-14 8/400 2019-02-14 17:56 by 威廉姆兵17
[硕博家园] 读博应该很孤单很孤单吧 (金币+2) +65 ymsjxjjf 2019-02-09 81/4050 2019-02-14 17:24 by 2516419621
[论文投稿] IJHMT投稿过程是怎么样的 +3 pengyou213 2019-02-14 5/250 2019-02-14 12:34 by pengyou213
[有机交流] 请教一下,工业上乙醇钠是如何生产的? +3 ycpharm 2019-02-13 8/400 2019-02-14 11:57 by oyzh
[考研] 感觉陷入了泥潭,双脚抬不起来了 +18 lyy* 2019-02-12 42/2100 2019-02-13 23:21 by lyy*
[考博] 啦啦啦啦啦 +7 moouran 2019-02-12 17/850 2019-02-13 19:07 by moouran
[考研] 考研日记 +6 人生方向 2019-02-12 9/450 2019-02-13 19:05 by 人生方向
[考博] 考博面试,着装问题 +18 kellysjdym 2019-02-13 18/900 2019-02-13 15:43 by 一见如夏
[硕博家园] 嗯嗯 +13 yuoyuoyuo 2019-02-13 13/650 2019-02-13 14:31 by 994854007
[论文投稿] ACS Nano送審會寄信通知嗎? 6+4 modify1977 2019-02-11 9/450 2019-02-13 00:22 by modify1977
[论文投稿] 小论文又双叒叕悲剧了 +4 轮子zszs 2019-02-11 8/400 2019-02-12 22:09 by 轮子zszs
[留学DIY] 申请读硕士和博士 +3 laki 2019-02-12 3/150 2019-02-12 18:52 by cf632
[硕博家园] 读博 +12 暮色恋伊人 2019-02-11 13/650 2019-02-12 16:08 by 左波小小虫
[硕博家园] 一切都慢慢来 +5 怡慕 2019-02-11 8/400 2019-02-12 12:52 by 怡慕
[无机非金属] 新型炭材料就业前景如何? +6 18438608250 2019-02-11 6/300 2019-02-12 08:16 by wuyuefeng
[职场人生] 是否需要离职 +7 piaobo71 2019-02-09 7/350 2019-02-10 11:35 by 阿什利扬
信息提示
请填处理意见