| 查看: 2172 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
投稿被拒，心塞塞，请各位看一下审稿意见已有5人参与
|
|||
|
COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: I have some comments: 1. The paper generally seems to be well-organized, in particular, the problem description reveals some interesting aspects of the infinite-capacity M/M/1 queuing system with working breakdowns and impatience customers. 2. I however find that the focus of this manuscript is to use the mathematical analytic method to solve some performance measures of M/M/1 queuing system with working breakdowns and impatience customers. But the infinite-capacity M/M/1 queuing system mentioned by this manuscript can be easily simulated by SimEvents module on Simulink platform of Matlab software. I therefore suggest the authors to improve some presentation on the superiority of the mathematical analytic method compared with the simulation method. Reviewer #2: Review reports on "Analysis of Impatient Customers in Repairable Queue with Working Breakdowns" (JORC-D-18-00080) This paper analyzes a queueing system with impatient customers and repairable server. The performance measures are given with numerical examples to be provided. After reading the paper, my general assessment is that it bellows the basic requirement for publication. Hence, I have to recommend rejection. My major concerns are mainly focused on the following two aspects. 1) The paper is full of grammar errors and typos. It does not fit the general (even minimum) requirement for publication. So, I suggest the authors to thoroughly improve the English writing. 2) The technique of analysis is rather standard. The research motivation needs to be more focused. What is the highlight of the paper in terms of scientific significance? Is it a new technique, or does it provide new observations in academic significance or practical application? I am not requiring so many highlights for a paper to be published in JORC, but provide one (or two) point(s) being OK. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
杭州国企和浙江高校如何选择？
已经有22人回复
-
小孩7岁，上一年级，不自信，学习较差
已经有36人回复
-
想问一下有没有需要文章但是没时间带学生的研究生导师。
已经有19人回复
-
颜宁:基础研究应顶天立地,立地即从需求端作为问题的出发点,立项背景就是面向真实需求
已经有3人回复
-
发现督导在听课，需要跟TA招呼示意吗？有同学看手机、课件有疏漏算大问题吗？
已经有4人回复
-
催稿后秒拒
已经有6人回复
-
前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然，现在基金委发来调查函
已经有10人回复
-
298求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
申请省自然科学基金，研究区能否是省外区域
已经有13人回复
-
国内科研环境差导致国内科研水平差的根源
已经有3人回复
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2018-10-22 17:10:15
2楼2018-10-22 16:53:25
903279943
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2165.4
- 散金: 4634
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 1731
- 在线: 382.3小时
- 虫号: 1488805
- 注册: 2011-11-12
- 专业: 环境地球化学
3楼2018-10-22 17:08:00
5楼2018-10-22 17:12:08
100