| 查看: 3381 | 回复: 8 | ||||
[交流]
APL审稿意见回来了，各位虫友帮忙看一下有机会吗已有5人参与
|
|
The reviewers' comments are included below and/or attached. In view of their recommendations, we cannot accept your paper for publication in its present form. If you revise the paper to meet the reviewers' objections, we will be happy to give it further consideration. Please indicate how the manuscript has been revised in a separate Response Letter file so that the editors can see whether you have complied with the reviewers' comments. Please use add file to upload the Response Letter file, and use replace for any files that have been revised or changed. Revised manuscripts must be submitted through the online submission system. They are not accepted by email. The revised manuscript should be returned to the Editor promptly. Your revision is due by 15-Sep-2018. A manuscript returned more than 60 days from today should be submitted as a new manuscript and will be given a new receipt date. Please go to the URL below to submit the revised version. To meet AIP Production requirements, please provide a separate figure file for each cited figure number (all parts in one file), in addition to your article-text file. https://apl.peerx-press.org/cgi-bin/main.plex (If clicking on the above URL address directly from your mail program is unsuccessful, please copy and paste the complete address into your browser.) Thank you for the opportunity to examine this work. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐
 SCI投稿经验精华 |
» 猜你喜欢
博士白读了
已经有50人回复
-
with editor 两个月了，什么原因？
已经有16人回复
-
普通院校药学硕士，做合成的，感觉找不到工作
已经有17人回复
-
如何分离原料与产品
已经有13人回复
-
LWT投
已经有3人回复
-
真的好想读博！
已经有22人回复
-
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有16人回复
-
没学上
已经有12人回复
-
研二光催化6月底四篇二区什么水平
已经有15人回复
-
环肽的合成
已经有5人回复
Quentin520
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 627.3
- 散金: 149
- 红花: 2
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 584
- 在线: 75.9小时
- 虫号: 8117027
- 注册: 2018-02-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
2楼2018-08-17 14:00:42
3楼2018-08-17 15:31:55
4楼2018-08-17 16:27:00
robertfairy
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3620.6
- 散金: 554
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 781
- 在线: 71小时
- 虫号: 1148336
- 注册: 2010-11-16
- 专业: 控制理论与方法
5楼2018-08-17 22:11:50
|
这是审稿人意见帮忙看一下 Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: Does this paper meet APL's standards: Yes Is the paper scientifically sound with the assertions made and conclusions drawn well supported: Yes Is the discussion of related work and associated references adequate?: Yes Is the English satisfactory?: Yes Is the title short, interesting, and descriptive of the contents?: Yes Is the paper well organized and understandable?: Yes Reviewer #2 Evaluations: Does this paper meet APL's standards: No Is the paper scientifically sound with the assertions made and conclusions drawn well supported: No Is the discussion of related work and associated references adequate?: Yes Is the English satisfactory?: No Is the title short, interesting, and descriptive of the contents?: Yes Is the paper well organized and understandable?: No |
6楼2018-08-18 13:36:56
7楼2018-08-19 10:59:34
8楼2018-08-20 04:48:51
9楼2018-09-10 00:24:45
5