| 查看: 3704 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 huanqir 的 20 个金币 | |||
huanqir新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
投了一个IEEE TRANS ON EMC 大修意见，大神帮忙看一下希望大不大
|
||
|
本人小白一枚，最近投了IEEE trans on EMC，给了个大修意见，大神帮忙看一下能不能中。副编辑给的意见是：The paper is in the margin of rejection. Please carefully revise the paper. If all the concerns from the reviewers are not well responded, the paper will not be considered further.心里好虚。下面附上审稿人意见： Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author Although this paper introduced a very interesting topic and it mitigation method, the analysis and explanations addressed in the paper are not sufficient to be published. Modeling approaches are proposed to understand the malfunction of a device inside a train, but basically, no reasonable validation for the equivalent circuit itself is shown throughout the paper. Either numerical simulation or equivalent circuit should be compared to measurement in real trains or equivalent circumstance. Just comparing equivalent circuit to numerical simulations (based on the equivalent circuit) does not support how the mitigation method author applied to resolve the problem works A railroad is modeled as a ground surface in the simplified model shown in Fig. 5, which is also related to L and C equations in eq 1 and eq 2. Is it reasonable to assume a railroad as an ideal ground surface? It is hard to understand the equivalent circuit in Fig. 11. Which structures in the real rail system correspond to the cable and the perfect ground, respectively, in the equivalent circuit? It would be better to overlay the equivalent circuit with the diagram in Fig. 3 (or any other equivalent diagram) for better understanding. Is Fig. 16 measurement or simulation? In either case, more detailed measurement/simulation set-up needs to be addressed. Where does the skin effect occur? The ground surface is set to be a perfect conductor. There is no clear explanation about the cable, but no conductivity information is given as well. Assuming the cable is also a perfect conductor, there is no structure that would be affected by the skin effect. In the paragraph above Fig. 18, a reference number is missing in the sentence “, which is identical to that presented in [].” Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author 1) The paper needs a major revision for English style/grammar—I have highlighted the sentences that need the most work. 2) Please expand acronyms in title 3) Define HEMP… (High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse)? 4) In Fig. 18 you describe the peak voltage to be at 543.7V but the figure shows a peak voltage of 54.39V—is this a typo? 5) Fig. 21 shows a zoom of the graph around 0.1us where the simulation and theoretical results differ more significantly than during other times. Please elaborate on the discrepancy between the two results. Also, the legend could be more clear (blue dashed line = CST model?; red solid line=FDTD?) 6) For the simulation results (Fig. 21), you present the data of induced voltage by HEMP; please include a comparison of the trapezoidal pulse excitation to CST model as well. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author 1. The statistic result should be provided to suggest the conclusion about "... operates normally after installing TVS." 2. The proportion of derivation of the FDTD method is too large in comparison with other material. For example, the discussion on the fluctuation of induced voltage after installing TVS should be included. 3. The writing in section V is very poor and without any proofreading. For example, "When the steel rail is gets rusty seriously...", "...cause an lumped voltage...", "presented in []" 4. In section V-B-2) the induced voltage level in the description is not consistent with the figures. 5. Are the figures (1, 2, and 4) been authorized to use? 6. The figures should be resize (the font size of labels are too different) 7. The elaboration of "HEMP" should be provided at the first time the word appeared. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
兄弟们帮我看看这两个结构怎么合成
已经有5人回复
-
一审一个审稿人，小修，会怎么样呀？
已经有6人回复
-
院士建议：对勇于提出解决卡脖子问题新解决方案的学者加大资助力度
已经有7人回复
-
没.赶.上.今.年.博.士.的.同.学.看.过.来.
已经有10人回复
-
美国教授开除中国研究生：我就不该录取你！
已经有6人回复
-
某系主任被同校教授举报包养情妇、长期嫖娼
已经有14人回复
-
特别资助审核状态
已经有6人回复
-
国自然青年基金只有一篇能第一标注，其他都是第二标注能结题吗？
已经有5人回复
-
杭州国企和浙江高校如何选择？
已经有20人回复
-
发个文章，结果被某学报请的外审PUA了
已经有8人回复
armstronglet
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 175 (高中生)
- 金币: 10498.2
- 散金: 1998
- 红花: 44
- 帖子: 3043
- 在线: 1508小时
- 虫号: 1861616
- 注册: 2012-06-16
- 专业: 人格心理学
6楼2018-01-18 16:46:26
huanqir
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1007.6
- 帖子: 58
- 在线: 31.9小时
- 虫号: 2328658
- 注册: 2013-03-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁环境与电磁兼容
7楼2018-01-18 19:15:04
匿名
用户注销 (正式写手)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 1514.6
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 726
- 在线: 88.9小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2014-02-16
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 信号理论与信号处理
14楼2018-01-23 03:13:47
huanqir
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1007.6
- 帖子: 58
- 在线: 31.9小时
- 虫号: 2328658
- 注册: 2013-03-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁环境与电磁兼容
2楼2018-01-18 15:20:02
huanqir
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1007.6
- 帖子: 58
- 在线: 31.9小时
- 虫号: 2328658
- 注册: 2013-03-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁环境与电磁兼容
3楼2018-01-18 15:41:11
bbs_guo
金虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 11592.7
- 散金: 2506
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 3873
- 在线: 1614.1小时
- 虫号: 3551391
- 注册: 2014-11-21
- 专业: 电气科学与工程
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2018-01-20 00:06:25
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2018-01-20 00:06:25
|
看上去意见不太好，得好好修改，加油！ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
4楼2018-01-18 16:35:12
huanqir
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1007.6
- 帖子: 58
- 在线: 31.9小时
- 虫号: 2328658
- 注册: 2013-03-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁环境与电磁兼容
5楼2018-01-18 16:36:18
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
8楼2018-01-18 23:33:52
|
顶一下 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
9楼2018-01-19 10:30:54
huanqir
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1007.6
- 帖子: 58
- 在线: 31.9小时
- 虫号: 2328658
- 注册: 2013-03-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁环境与电磁兼容
10楼2018-01-19 10:31:03
10