| 查看: 5979 | 回复: 26 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者bb736532将赠送您 3 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
各位大虾，刚收到专家意见Consider after Major Changes 但是 编辑直接Rejected已有7人参与
|
||
|
在 Shock and Vibration上投了论文 专家给的是Consider after Major Changes 但是 编辑直接Rejected 专辑意见： This paper studies the influence of******. However, it is not insightful enough to be published. The comments are listed as follows: 1）Based on a preliminary reading, the English text is to be significantly improved and substantial editing is required before it is accepted for publication. My advice is that you have your manuscript edited by a native English speaker. Alternatively, you may use an editing service. 2）Too many Chinese language articles are cited which is not suitable for publication in an international journal. 3）With regard to the equations listed in the paper, Eqns. (1)-(3) should not be repeated with the related references, only the final results and citations are required to be written. The same case for the other equations, the authors should give the proper citation and outstand contribution. 4）The authors cite many articles in section 2 and section 3. Which theory or equation is proposed by you? What is the function and application of them in this paper? 5）Section 4, the constitutive law of rock used in the numerical simulation should be given. How is the model setup related to analytical solution? 6）Section 5, the application is totally isolated from the previous analytical solution and numerical simulation. In this regard, we cannot find the usefulness of this study to support the engineering design. 请问有没有必要修改后重新投稿还是改投好 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一审一个审稿人，小修，会怎么样呀？
已经有7人回复
-
哎
已经有5人回复
-
院士建议：对勇于提出解决卡脖子问题新解决方案的学者加大资助力度
已经有10人回复
-
25申博记录贴
已经有4人回复
-
紫外光谱
已经有3人回复
-
事业单位还是大学好？
已经有16人回复
-
考研英语带学
已经有5人回复
-
298求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
家乡二本高校/沿海传统私企，如何抉择？
已经有13人回复
-
下雨了
已经有19人回复
24楼2017-11-14 12:50:23
 本帖仅楼主可见 |
2楼2017-11-12 14:52:46
3楼2017-11-12 14:54:05
4楼2017-11-12 14:56:56
50