查看: 950  |  回复: 19

wtr1992

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] energy大修后返回,好忐忑。。。求有经验的虫友帮看下审稿意见有戏吗~~~???已有10人参与

有三个审稿人给出的意见分别如下,已修改前天刚返回期刊,现在状态under review了。。。好忐忑,求问接受的概率大吗???小硕想毕业啊。。。

Reviewer #1: Please make more synthetic conclusions/discussion.

Please cite more articles on biomass pre-treatment and energy conversion pathways such as:
- http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.01.012
- http://doi.org/10.3303/CET1437083






Reviewer #2: The paper analyses, through a multi-objective optimization model, the sector of power generation from biomass (forest and agricultural residues), analysing the relations between power producers and brokers and the effects of Chinese incentives.
The work is original (even if it should be better justified, as specified below) and the subject is fully relevant to the scope of the Journal. The dissertation is clear, even if it could be shortened in several parts. Most of the results are described but not adequately discussed (highlighting the correlations between input and key results).
So, I recommend accepting the paper for the publication in Energy after major revision, according to the following suggestions (E = essential amendments; P = preferred amendments; T = typographical errors).
1.      (E). A hint of the results should be given in the highlights.
2.      (T). I recommend taking care of the disposition of text, tables and figures, to simplify the reviewing process. For example, figure 1 placed between abstract and introduction seems a sort of graphical abstract and not the first figure of the paper.
3.      (E). The possible use of biomass as energy storage (as specified in the introduction, line 3) is controversial. As a matter of facts, biomass storage can involve a series of problems due to the risk of fire and to its decomposition. Please check the sentence.
4.      (E). It is not clear if the sentence "According to our investigation, …" (page 3, 3rd line from the bottom) is referred to the results of this study or to an input data. Please clarify it and possibly support the sentence with adequate references.
5.      (P). I suggest to follow the conventional style for the citations. In particular, "Ref." should be replaced with the name of the first author. For example, the sentence "… was conducted by Ref. [5], which…" should be replaced by "… was conducted by Kumar et al. (2008) [5], which…".
6.      (E). The introduction reports a very detailed review of literature on power generation from biomass and supply chain, but it does not specify the lacks covered by this work. I recommend reviewing the section in order to underline the innovation of the work.
7.      (E). The reading of section 2.1 is very complex. The equations should be better commented, in order to simplify the comprehension.
8.      (E). If I understand, the complete model (equation 45) is obtained by a sort of combination of the previous equations (1 to 44). In this case, I suggest to specify it and to report such a model in a specific paragraph ("2.3. Whole model" or something similar). If my interpretation is wrong, please clarify the meaning of equation 45.
9.      (P). The introduction of section 3 (from "China has become the world's larger…" to "… from excessive fuel costs than other countries" could be read as a general introduction of the whole paper, so it can be moved to section 1.
10.     (P). Since the sentence "After investigating 13 biomass…" (page 10, last line) has been already reported, i recommend adding "As mentioned" at the beginning.
11.     (E). Where do the parameters reported in tables 2 to 10 come from? They seem to be input data (according to that reported at the beginning of section 4.1), but in this case they should be supported by references.
12.     (E). Please justify the trend of figure 4, comparing them to the input data. Why - for example - the upper limit occurs in the period between November and April? And why the minimum occurs in June?
13.     (E). More in general, the figures reported in section 4 are described in the text, but not commented enough. I recommend reviewing the text, giving a reason on the key results.
14.     (P). The two sub-sections 5.1 and 5.2, in my personal opinion, could be merged in a single section.
15.     (E). Conclusions should be better supported by numerical results.




Reviewer #3: This work presents a mathematical method for the maximization of the profit and the social welfare of a 30 MW biomass power plant. The model is exhaustive and flexible, it can be applied to different kind of conversion technologies and biomass types. However, the work is focused only on a biomass combustion power plant with two kinds of biomass: agricultural residues and forestry residues. In other words, a very complex model is applied to a single case-study.  This cannot allow a reader to perceive the level of validity of such a model, and the paper could not be accepted in the present form.  In order to increase the scientific level of this contribution and in order to validate the optimization model, the authors are strongly invited to simulate different kinds of biomass conversion technologies such as gasification power plants and biogas power plants.

The paper is generally well organized and fairly well written.  However, some misspellings and typos are still to be corrected.  In addition, the following changes are suggested:
1) Add line numbering
2) Please do not use Ref [x] but cite the name of the author of the work.
3) 1x30 MWh is meaningless.  Probably, the authors intended to indicate a 30 MW electrical power plant
4) Nomenclature needs to be put at the end of the manuscript in a specific section, not in Table 1.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

zyk3107

新虫 (初入文坛)

★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-07-21 12:07:19
希望很大啊。都给了挺不错的评价,只需要按照建议修改就行了。不过评论3说你这个模型不错,但是研究的案例对象太简单,有点“杀鸡不用宰牛刀”的感觉

发自小木虫IOS客户端
/////');">
2楼2017-07-21 10:43:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

caomaoguan

金虫 (正式写手)

★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-07-21 12:07:27
编辑虽然给的是大修, 但是看审稿意见, 挺积极的, 楼主不要担心, 静候佳音吧!
话说最近不是在放假, 审稿进度不会受到影响么?
/////');">
立志做一名真正的伪电气攻城狮,在这温柔的世界里横冲直撞。
3楼2017-07-21 10:53:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖
/////');">
4楼2017-07-21 11:03:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

852058683

木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by caomaoguan at 2017-07-21 10:53:25
编辑虽然给的是大修, 但是看审稿意见, 挺积极的, 楼主不要担心, 静候佳音吧!
话说最近不是在放假, 审稿进度不会受到影响么?

是不是编辑在放假?

发自小木虫Android客户端
/////');">
5楼2017-07-21 11:35:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hanhan95

木虫 (正式写手)

★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-07-21 15:32:27
我也觉得放假了,我的二审一直没有消息

发自小木虫Android客户端
/////');">
6楼2017-07-21 12:40:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

caomaoguan

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 852058683 at 2017-07-21 11:35:44
是不是编辑在放假?
...

我有一篇目前在审稿人手里,挺担心审稿人在放假,不审稿的。。。

发自小木虫Android客户端
/////');">
立志做一名真正的伪电气攻城狮,在这温柔的世界里横冲直撞。
7楼2017-07-21 12:51:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

epzeyuli

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
按照意见修改后肯定接受,三个审稿人均对创新点给予高度评价,瑕不掩瑜,祝贺!

发自小木虫Android客户端
/////');">
8楼2017-07-21 15:47:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wtr1992

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by zyk3107 at 2017-07-21 10:43:46
希望很大啊。都给了挺不错的评价,只需要按照建议修改就行了。不过评论3说你这个模型不错,但是研究的案例对象太简单,有点“杀鸡不用宰牛刀”的感觉

对啊。。。就是第三个审稿人的意见感觉毛毛的,说什么当前这种状况下不能接收,所以很担心。。。
/////');">
9楼2017-07-21 16:03:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wtr1992

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by caomaoguan at 2017-07-21 10:53:25
编辑虽然给的是大修, 但是看审稿意见, 挺积极的, 楼主不要担心, 静候佳音吧!
话说最近不是在放假, 审稿进度不会受到影响么?

谢谢鼓励~不知道啊我的是十多天前要求大修的,刚刚上传,不懂会不会影响进度
/////');">
10楼2017-07-21 16:04:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wtr1992 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 省基公示但没出编号要写到国基上去吗? +7 zhongyuan764 2021-01-21 8/400 2021-01-23 17:35 by lihonghusam
[教师之家] 过了38岁没拿到帽子的 +14 feifeigege 2021-01-22 18/900 2021-01-23 17:23 by gwjxiaolang
[公派出国] 如果在国内上网课的话,CSC的补助是什么情况? +3 加油2020耶 2021-01-21 4/200 2021-01-23 16:52 by hsjhfjhcv
[考研] 382求调剂 +5 路易基9527 2021-01-22 8/400 2021-01-23 15:34 by 1526469
[硕博家园] 挺心疼被我鸽了的导师 +8 dyp8848 2021-01-18 14/700 2021-01-23 15:32 by zhaoqiang44
[硕博家园] 双非的博士有没有必要读 +16 小白cici 2021-01-18 20/1000 2021-01-23 13:30 by 方珺生
[考研] 求有学校能收调剂 数学二150 因为英语可能过不了报考学校的单科线所以求调剂 +4 wyh788111 2021-01-21 5/250 2021-01-22 23:03 by 我是新新呀
[论文投稿] under review时间变化 +9 江亭sky 2021-01-21 9/450 2021-01-22 20:51 by 乐果同桌
[基金申请] 又到写基金本子的时候了,赋诗一首,为大家解压 (金币+6) +18 aloesnow 2021-01-21 21/1050 2021-01-22 17:35 by yanxuexue
[第一性原理] 做第一性原理的公司,付费。有没有联系方式和主页 +3 hopedream 2021-01-21 3/150 2021-01-22 15:23 by 言榭竹昔
[论文投稿] 论文投稿成功后,没有收到投稿成功邮件! +6 野路 2021-01-17 6/300 2021-01-22 11:26 by Katherine7
[找工作] 求指导求定位求建议,工作太难找了,真的不知道咋继续了 +10 半夏潇湘 2021-01-21 10/500 2021-01-22 10:51 by terminato2
[考博] 计算机类申请读博需要几篇文章? +5 ACM零 2021-01-17 5/250 2021-01-22 09:33 by siegzu66
[材料工程] 寻找材料工程师职称,地区不限,能网查最好 +3 广州鼎为 2021-01-19 3/150 2021-01-22 08:47 by songyuren
[论文投稿] 一篇论文审了2年了... +21 wszzb 2021-01-19 26/1300 2021-01-22 08:42 by 编辑Alina
[高分子] 胶粘剂 +4 徐长安 2021-01-19 5/250 2021-01-21 20:30 by sjzhu2007
[基金申请] 是否超限? +4 luoyujuan 2021-01-21 7/350 2021-01-21 18:10 by 天天向上3035
[文学芳草园] 沁园春.长沙 +6 wpzhyp29 2021-01-19 8/400 2021-01-21 17:03 by mywai520
[教师之家] 请帮我看下投稿大修的这条意见,不胜感激 +4 luokereng 2021-01-19 10/500 2021-01-21 08:13 by luokereng
[基金申请] 自然科学基金结题 +13 yingyu427 2021-01-17 13/650 2021-01-18 09:53 by 老黑不黑
信息提示
请填处理意见