|
★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐
Referees should give reasons for their judgment of the importance in line with the following guidelines:
Based on our experience, we anticipate that: The top 5% of the submitted manuscripts are very important:
* The results are highly innovative and of such significance as to attract the interest of the vast majority of the readers of Angewandte Chemie.
* The results corroborate or lead to a new important theory or mechanism, or repudiate an established important theory or mechanism.
* The scientific community has been waiting for such results for a long time.
* When two referees rate the Communication as "very important" it is denoted as being a "very important paper" (VIP).
Approximately 20% of the submitted manuscripts are highly important:
* The work is conceptually new.
* The work is a very significant step forward for an important and/or wider field of research.
Another 20% of the submitted manuscripts are important:
* The work is important for a wider field of chemistry, but is not suitable for Angewandte Chemie. It is more suitable for publication either as a Communication or—after expansion of the manuscript—as a Full Paper in journals such as Chemistry – A European Journal or Chemistry – An Asian Journal.
A third 20% of the submitted manuscripts are important but too specialized:
* The work is of limited interest for a broad and heterogeneous readership.
* The work is more suitable for journals catering for a more specific audience, such as one of Angewandte's sister journals: Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., Eur. J. Org. Chem., ChemBioChem, ChemPhysChem, ChemMedChem, ChemSusChem.
We also receive manuscripts that are less important and ill suited for Angewandte Chemie or its sister journals. Most of these are directly rejected by the editors. |
|