| 查看: 748 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者leao0920将赠送您 45 个金币 | ||
[求助]
Submissions Needing Revision中给出下列意见，但是不太明白！求大神指点！已有1人参与
|
||
|
Thank you for your manuscript. It will require significant revision before I can proceed with further consideration for peer review. From an editorial perspective, the use of English grammar requires revision and improvement throughout the entire manuscript. References must also be cited in the text in the required journal format. The pressure unit to report for dust explosion results is bar(g). The main difficulty at this point is that there appears to be no original research contribution to the archival literature on dust explosions. All of the phenomena you describe (e.g., the variation of explosion pressure with dust concentration, the influence of particle size, etc.) are all well-known and well-established. There would be no reason to expect any other behavior of the tested sample. Explosion results for rubber dust are also widely available. So in conclusion, the original research contribution would have to be explicitly described in the manuscript. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
想问一下有没有需要文章但是没时间带学生的研究生导师。
已经有19人回复
-
颜宁:基础研究应顶天立地,立地即从需求端作为问题的出发点,立项背景就是面向真实需求
已经有3人回复
-
发现督导在听课，需要跟TA招呼示意吗？有同学看手机、课件有疏漏算大问题吗？
已经有4人回复
-
催稿后秒拒
已经有6人回复
-
前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然，现在基金委发来调查函
已经有10人回复
-
298求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
申请省自然科学基金，研究区能否是省外区域
已经有13人回复
-
国内科研环境差导致国内科研水平差的根源
已经有3人回复
-
CSC在职申请求问
已经有7人回复
-
家乡二本高校/沿海传统私企，如何抉择？
已经有15人回复
2楼2016-05-05 19:32:38
leao09203楼2016-05-05 20:38:12
4楼2016-05-05 22:55:21
2