查看: 350  |  回复: 7
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 好人已注册 的 16 个金币

好人已注册

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] IET GTD reject with resubmit是否需要改投征询大家意见

今年1月份向IET Generation Transmission & Distribution 投了一篇综述文章,本月编辑返回了评审意见如下:
Thank you for submitting your paper to IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. The peer review process is now complete. The referees and I feel that your paper requires significantly more work and is not acceptable for publication in its current form.  My decision is therefore to decline your paper with encouragement to submit a substantially revised paper.  I appreciate that this decision will be a disappointment, but hope that you find the referees' comments (given below) useful in improving your paper.

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
This manuscript reviewed the recent research on MMC in the aspects of topology, modeling, modulation technique, control etc.
My comments on the submitted article are the following:
1.        The manuscript is poorly written. There are lots of grammar mistakes and some of the sentences are too too long. Almost the whole second paragraph of Introduction section is a duplicate of the abstract. The writing quality should be well improved.
2.        This manuscript listed lots of other people’s previous work, however, it lacks of summary and conclusive statement.

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
Dear authors,
-How is the paper different from the following MMC review paper?
S. Debnath, J. Qin, B. Bahrani, M. Saeedifard and P. Barbosa, "Operation, Control, and Applications of the Modular Multilevel Converter: A Review," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 37-53, Jan. 2015.
The above paper also presents a review of the topology, modelling, control of MMC and has not even been cited in the submitted manuscript. The authors should add something not present in the above paper that would help the readers.

-The last 4 lines in the abstract and introduction have been exactly repeated. Please use different sentences.

-Please cite the correct reference in the text where required. In Section 3.2, all references numbers have been incorrectly cited. Please read through them and make the corrections. The same is also true in later Sections.

Reviewer: 3
Comments to the Author
Dear authors, the language requires additional proof-reading. There are many typos, grammatical and syntax mistakes.
The purpose of the paper is not clearly identified by the reviewer.
Please be aware, that the topic of MMC research is considered too big and too extensive to be covered by one single journal publication. It is thereby strongly recommended to set an appropriate focus on one or multiple aspects instead and to present these clearly and in a more detailed way. Otherwise important details are at risk to be neglected. The already made considerations can be implemented offhand.
The formatting is also characterized by mistakes and insufficient proofreading, such as captions, placement of figures and doubling of references ([17], p. 5).

除了语言写作上的问题,感觉几个审稿人的意见都很负面,尤其是第三个审稿人的意见好像几乎要推翻重写,所以在犹豫修改后重投还是改投到其他期刊。
请有经验的同志给点参考意见,十分感谢!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

好人已注册

新虫 (初入文坛)

2楼2016-05-06 09:21:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

好人已注册: 金币+1 2016-05-06 10:13:03
3楼2016-05-06 09:26:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wfls2008

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
好人已注册: 金币+1 2016-05-08 23:10:32
看这意见,堪忧。虽然能重投,但前景渺茫。周围有人就是这样的。做好改投准备吧。
4楼2016-05-06 18:59:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by wfls2008 at 2016-05-06 18:59:49
看这意见,堪忧。虽然能重投,但前景渺茫。周围有人就是这样的。做好改投准备吧。

5楼2016-05-06 21:10:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ieem

木虫 (文坛精英)

www.ieem.org

★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
好人已注册: 金币+2 2016-05-08 23:10:19
encouragement to submit a substantially revised paper - 除非不愿意改,一定要投。这样的文章发了最值得。我觉得主要是语言及写作问题,改投其它杂志也不会有太好的结果。
6楼2016-05-07 08:43:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

好人已注册

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by ieem at 2016-05-07 08:43:51
encouragement to submit a substantially revised paper - 除非不愿意改,一定要投。这样的文章发了最值得。我觉得主要是语言及写作问题,改投其它杂志也不会有太好的结果。

谢谢意见

发自小木虫Android客户端
7楼2016-05-08 23:10:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

杰仔珊

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问该期刊的论文模版在哪?是不是没有特定模版
8楼2018-10-19 14:34:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 好人已注册 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 哈工大考博秋季招生被刷,还要不要试试春季的。 +12 假一拳超人 2020-10-23 18/900 2020-10-24 21:24 by 张坤8535
[硕博家园] 一个毕业即失业,找工作博士的跌宕人生 +68 287573488 2020-10-18 73/3650 2020-10-24 16:29 by PPAAQQ
[分析] 自己制备的柴油想检测其中的组成成分 +3 yuoknow 2020-10-18 3/150 2020-10-24 11:01 by 柳絮虫
[硕博家园] Ai导入word图片有点模糊怎么办? +3 patrickcho 2020-10-21 6/300 2020-10-24 10:54 by Allub
[公派出国] CSC艰难改派中,希望听听大家的建议 +13 Flivo 2020-10-20 21/1050 2020-10-24 10:49 by lyf1850
[教师之家] 关于博士享受副教授待遇 +3 henrycn 2020-10-23 3/150 2020-10-23 22:17 by xli1984
[找工作] 应届土博offer选择:北京211特聘副教授VS上海211讲师? +16 沈知术 2020-10-19 21/1050 2020-10-23 19:42 by sunny_lala
[论文投稿] 请帮忙分析一下,主编的意思是拒绝,建议重投吗? +4 海宝心声 2020-10-22 4/200 2020-10-23 15:33 by tjuabraham
[基金申请] 2020年山东省自然科学基金这周会出结果吗 +9 wuqizheng 2020-10-21 11/550 2020-10-23 14:06 by sun506520
[硕博家园] 实验该怎么下手,压力大呀 +10 生物医学88 2020-10-21 14/700 2020-10-23 12:42 by kmght
[论文投稿] 遥感领域好中的sci +8 陈尧UCAS 2020-10-21 10/500 2020-10-23 11:58 by tangsiqi
[公派出国] 计划今年12月底或明年1月初去英国 +3 菠萝柚子 2020-10-20 5/250 2020-10-22 22:23 by 菠萝柚子
[硕博家园] 是不是聊胜于无 +9 木木木木2020 2020-10-21 28/1400 2020-10-22 21:21 by 木木木木2020
[论文投稿] 有没有人可以带一个3作,任何SCI期刊都可以,价钱好商量! +6 hzphzphzp 2020-10-21 13/650 2020-10-22 12:54 by 东风沐雨
[基金申请] 第一次写基金感觉太难了! +9 yuchimoqi 2020-10-20 9/450 2020-10-22 11:12 by JYFYyuhao
[论文投稿] 想发一篇论文 30+4 xxd429 2020-10-19 10/500 2020-10-21 23:21 by ff方法1
[教师之家] 打算购买一台工作站用于计算分析,有了解的虫友能给点建议吗? +5 无名小冰冰 2020-10-18 14/700 2020-10-21 20:41 by dolphin100
[版块工场] 【早起签到贴】2020年10月20日(q q 48626260 进群申请:小木虫——您个人ID) +7 8475 2020-10-20 7/350 2020-10-20 23:56 by miaomiao83
[教师之家] 上海科技大学助理研究员值得去吗?有人了解具体情况吗? +5 luosha500 2020-10-19 7/350 2020-10-20 12:59 by ddjasmine
[版块工场] 【早起签到贴】2020年10月19日(q q 48626260 进群申请:小木虫——您个人ID) +6 8475 2020-10-19 6/300 2020-10-19 08:48 by 陈超-冶金
信息提示
请填处理意见