| 查看: 1914 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者coq08yl将赠送您 10 个金币 | |||
[求助]
International journal of neural systems 投稿求助已有2人参与
|
|||
|
各位虫虫，大家好。 小妹两周前投稿international journal of neural systems, 第一次对这个期刊投稿，今天收到主编的回信如下： Dear XXXX XXX XX: This is to acknowledge the receipt of your above-referenced manuscript submitted for possible publication in the International Journal of Neural Systems. Please note that when a graduate student or a junior researcher is the co-author of a manuscript we ask the professor/advisor to submit it and be the corresponding author because he/she is in an experienced position to appreciate issues of originality, copyright assignment, and the high standard of publication of rigorously peer-reviewed research journals. Only unpublished original manuscripts will be considered for possible publication in IJNS. Submission of a manuscript implies that your manuscript or any variation of it has not been submitted elsewhere. If this manuscript is extension of your previously-published paper we ask you to send us a copy of that paper promptly so that our reviewers can determine the archival significance and scientific originality of the current submission compared with your previous publication. For a paper published in the proceedings of a conference to be considered for possible publication in the journal it has to be extended by additional original computational materials in a substantive way (there must be additional original computational research materials with an overlap of no more than 50%). In that case you should also forward a pdf file of your published paper with complete citation so that our reviewers can determine the originality of the current submission. Addition of literature review, introductory materials, and examples will not satisfy the condition of a substantially enhanced/different paper. I noted you have referenced the seminal 2003 paper but you do not seem to be familiar with significant research published on EEG signal analysis (see attached file), some published in this journal. You need to review this literature and then point out the computational originality and novelty of your paper. Authors are expected to review recent issues of the journal and indicate their familiarity with the recent research published in the journal. I often choose some of the reviewers among the authors of the papers published in the journal in recent years and cited in the paper. Such authors have filed journal’s Conscientious Reviewer form and are obligated to review papers for the journal in a timely manner. Potential reviewers who have never contributed to the journal often decline review requests or take many months to review thus delaying the review process. A senior author (not a student) should email me ALL of the following 6 items in the format requested: 1) A statement that this manuscript is your “original unpublished work and the manuscript or any variation of it has not been submitted to another publication previously.” I do not consider papers rejected by other journals. 2) The pdf file of your paper prepared in manuscript format in single-column and double-spaced for the purpose of reviewing. 3) The Word file of your paper prepared in double-column according to the attached journal template. This will be used to determine the length of your paper as journal pages. The total size of your attachment for the purpose of review should be limited to 10 Mb. If and when your paper is accepted you can include figures with finer resolutions exceeding the 10 Mb limit. 4) The names, affiliations, and full contact information including email addresses of six to ten leading researchers who have published in the subject area of the paper outside your country/region as a Word file. They should not be your advisor, advisee, research sponsor, or research collaborator. They can include senior researchers cited in your paper. I may choose some of the reviewers among them. Please disclose potential conflicts of interest if any. It is natural to presume that any researcher knows the leading researchers in his/her field of study (they are often cited in the paper) (List A). 5) Who are, in your opinion, the top 10 researchers in the world in the subject of the paper? Please provide their names, affiliations, and email addresses. Please send it as a Word file (List B). This will indicate whether the authors are familiar with the latest development in the field and their paper extends the state-of-the-art. This list can include those the author’s advisor, advisee, research sponsor, or research collaborator. 6) The attached Conscientious Reviewer form for each author (except students) as a Word file (The journal reviewers are often chosen among contributors to the journal. This is a way to obtain thoughtful and detailed reviews in a timely fashion). Thank you. Regards, 请问我是否需要对论文修改后，再重投吗？还是不需要修改，这里看不出来是否被拒了呢，他让我看(see attached file)，都是主编的文献。 请投过这个期刊的虫虫指点迷津，非常感谢。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
小孩7岁，上一年级，不自信，学习较差
已经有37人回复
-
无under review，直接DIP，咋么办。
已经有9人回复
-
刚博士毕业，入职普通一本高校
已经有4人回复
-
想问一下有没有需要文章但是没时间带学生的研究生导师。
已经有21人回复
-
家乡二本高校/沿海传统私企，如何抉择？
已经有16人回复
-
期末给学生划重点都是什么话术啊
已经有7人回复
-
前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然，现在基金委发来调查函
已经有16人回复
-
编辑返稿让改格式，这个时候能大修内容吗？
已经有4人回复
-
发现督导在听课，需要跟TA招呼示意吗？有同学看手机、课件有疏漏算大问题吗？
已经有6人回复
-
事业单位还是大学好？
已经有19人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 西悉尼大学土木工程、工程材料博士奖学金开始申请，名额3人，截止9.15
已经有19人回复
- CSC Cambridge International Scholarship 2012甩金币了
已经有51人回复
- 【分享】当代糖化学.pdf
已经有15人回复
ieem
木虫 (文坛精英)
www.ieem.org
- 应助: 160 (高中生)
- 金币: 3801.7
- 散金: 2249
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 10852
- 在线: 239.3小时
- 虫号: 689019
- 注册: 2009-01-07
- 专业: 工业工程与管理
2楼2016-04-24 08:56:41
ieem
木虫 (文坛精英)
www.ieem.org
- 应助: 160 (高中生)
- 金币: 3801.7
- 散金: 2249
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 10852
- 在线: 239.3小时
- 虫号: 689019
- 注册: 2009-01-07
- 专业: 工业工程与管理
3楼2016-04-24 08:57:17
4楼2016-04-24 11:14:08
5楼2018-03-13 16:02:36
10