Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Based on the valuable comments of this specialist Reviewer and on the 41 % of similarity of this manuscript with other papers I decide therefore reject it.

For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Yours sincerely,

Silvia Antonia Brandán, Ph.D
Editor
Journal of Molecular Structure

Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: The research performed by Fu and coworkers shows a study of three Schiff base compounds. The authors conducted the synthesis and characterization via IR and NMR. The corrosion inhibition activities of three compounds were studied using theoretical and experimental methods. Although this work has some bright spots, I am afraid I cannot recommend the acceptance of the manuscript because the English is not good. The manuscript contains numerous grammatical, typographical, and technical mistakes. It is really hard to fully understand what the authors are trying to discuss.

General comments:
1.        The manuscript needs rewriting and proofreading before resubmission.
2.        There is very little need to show the synthetic device in Fig. 1. An undergraduate student can configure such device according to the information in the text.
3.        Some figures can be merged to reduce figure numbers. 返回小木虫查看更多