审稿意见回复问题
这是审稿人意思:The paper is long and a lot of information is given, the reviewer is of the opinion that a discussion section would perfect the paper. Indeed, the discussion is conducted in each section at the moment. For instance, the dislocation structure evolution mechanisms are first discussed in the modelling section prior to the actual TEM experiments are displayed.
我想请教大家,是要重新写一个disscussion部分,还是把文章稍作顺序调整就好!
我现在不太明白审稿人的意见。谢谢大家 返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
我理解的是你文章在讨论之前在前文中都进行了讨论,是不是把他们集中在讨论节比较好?这个意思吗?
同意楼上意见,应该是你讨论重复了,使文章不够简洁。
应该是你的文章太长,审稿人读到最后就忘了前面的结论。最好在倒数第二段(conclusion)之前加一段discussion,把全文的思路整理一遍,
哪个方面的文章呀
除了没部分的discussion,最后再补一个总的discussion。
祝福