看不懂这条审稿意见,请教大家!
投稿到Springer的一个期刊,现在返回第二轮审稿意见,其中有一条意见是这样的:
I appreciate the sincere efforts made by the author. Now After reading the corrections and suggestions and then paper i could understand the concept and the results.
However, It will be helpful to a reader to know what and why such plots are used?
请教大家,这个"what and why such plots are used?"是指的什么呢?
such plots是这句话之前的“the concept and the results”,还是文章中的图啊?这个审稿人在第一轮审稿时给了6条意见,看得出他不是我们这个方向的,问的问题大多是他/她不明白一个信号为什么这么表示,采用的对比方法的来龙去脉(比如,基本的WVD,作为一种跟论文提出方法的对比方法,让我详细给出这些基本方法的定义、思路)等等,我都在修改说明中详细解释了,并在第一轮修改稿中增加了相关的内容。这一次,他就提出了这一条意见,我现在还没弄明白要我做什么。
还望大家多多指教。 返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
前边的concepts和results,i think
我觉得他的意思是虽然他懂了,但是读者不一定明白,所以让你修改一下concepts和results的说明,让reader更明白
谢谢大家,看来的确有分歧,我周围的人觉得有个"what",更倾向于认为图是由什么工具做出的,为什么这么做。所以还是希望更多人说说自己的理解。
想了一下,还是把这位审稿人第一次的意见也补充在这儿,把两次的意见都放在这儿,麻烦大家再帮我看看,综合起来,第二次审稿人是要想让我怎样改,谢谢。
Round 1:
1. Significant Grammar mistakes in first para of the introduction.
2. what is t^2 in equation (1) ?
3. Notations are not properly defined.
4. How is FLO statistics is applied and justified. I could not understand clearly.
5. I feel that it would be better if justification of flo approach also in detail.
6. Results: FLOs are only compared and not with RAT, and others. Refine results
Round 2:
I appreciate the sincere efforts made by the author. Now After reading the corrections and suggestions and then paper i could understand the concept and the results.
However, It will be helpful to a reader to know what and why such plots are used,
我个人觉得,如果你这个是创新的,那么你需要更加想细的解释。如果是已有的方法,可以列出一些参考文献,比较并说明你的plot
请问,"比较并说明你的plot",plot是说的什么呀?我就是弄不清这个……
你做的什么实验简单说一下吧?