收到拒稿信，有三个审稿人，其中两个是推荐并且提了一些中肯的意见，第三个审稿人意见比较大，言辞也有点犀利，觉得创新性不足，并且也提了很多建议。但好在所有的建议都有修改和补充的可能，也不算很难。编辑的评语如下，以编辑的态度，如果我认真修改后重投，希望大吗？请各位虫友给点建议！
After careful review by the editors and experts in the field, we regret to inform you that we are unable to accept your manuscript for publication in XXX.

The comments of the reviewers are included below in order for you to understand the basis for our decision.  The editor has noted that the paper is not without its worth, and would like to encourage you to improve your work in accordance with the reviewers' remarks.  In the future, the paper (written anew) may be resubmitted and evaluated as a new contribution.  In this case, the revised manuscript would be considered a new submission and would be given a new manuscript number with a new date of receipt. We hope that you would continue to submit your work to this journal in the future.


Based on the three reviews provided below, I have determined that your manuscript is not acceptable for publication in XXX in its present state. Reviewers 2 and 3, in particular, have provided helpful technical and editorial comments that must be addresses. Please not the comment from Reviewer #3 expressing concerns about the novelty of this work (they feel that the novelty of the work is limited) and the need to clearly articualte this aspect of the manuscript.

Should you decide to submit a revised manuscript, please address each of the reviewer's comments in a summary letter in which you state the page and line number of the change that was made in response to the comment and show where the change has been made in the manuscript using highlighting or bolding. When responding to the reviewers comments, please make sure that the responses are reflected in the corresponding changes in the text. Some of the reviewer's comments seek explanation. You should provide this in both the summary letter and in the manuscript (the explanation(s) sought by the reviewers likely arose from insufficient information and/or clarity in the manuscript which indicates that it should be added to the revised paper).



感谢大家的鼓励，后来我按照审稿人的意见进行了修改，并重新投稿。文章经过重审，小修后顺利接收了。希望大家遇到类似的情况也能再接再厉，不要轻易放弃，也许也会有逆转的结果。

[ Last edited by 比目小鱼 on 2018-2-13 at 16:29 ] 返回小木虫查看更多