当前位置: 首页 > 量子化学 >【求助】审稿人意见不明白

【求助】审稿人意见不明白

作者 lsgan
来源: 小木虫 250 5 举报帖子
+关注

The use of Gibbs energy in the Boltzmann distribution is inadequate and meaningless. And generally, a reference to the thermodynamic potentials has to be more accurate (e.g., the standard potentials have to be explicitly shown, etc.) 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • gretayuan

    inadequate and meaningless:研究不充分、没有意义

    a reference to the thermodynamic potentials has to be more accurate : thermodynamic potentials 没有讲清楚,此处文献的引用需要更精准

  • yalefield

    在脖儿子螨分布中用了急捕死能量,非常不合适,基本没意义。

  • lsgan

    关键是后面两句话的意思

  • yalefield

    引用回帖:
    Originally posted by lsgan at 2010-09-01 11:14:21:
    关键是后面两句话的意思

    a reference to the thermodynamic potentials has to be more accurate (e.g., the standard potentials have to be explicitly shown, etc.)

    热力学势能的参照标准必须更加准确,例如,您参照的是哪种标准数据(该数据测定的机构、温度、压力......)?要明确说明

  • lsgan

    谢谢啊高手

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓