郁闷,一审后接受发表,二审居然拒稿,请问该如何处理?
投Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics(IF=1.65),一审用了2个多月,结果是小修后,Based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s).
二审用了1个月,With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
气死了。请问有遇到过这样的事情吗?没有给出什么合适的理由。两次审稿人意见都是很简单的,请问该如何处理?
一审的审稿人意见:Reviewer #1: Dear Author,
thank you for submitting the manuscript: `。。。。` to the journal `Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics`. It was very interesting. Unfortunately, there are a few aspects I need to comment:
- many shortcuts make the manuscript confusing
- what is the clinical consequence?
- the tables and figures are not in a good quality and they are confusing
- please don`t write the name of a medication (Gonal-F) in the paper!
Thank you very much for your paper, if you revise the paper and go over the mentioned points again the paper could be reviewed again.
二审的审稿人意见:thank you for resubmitting your revised manuscript.
After extensive reevaluation and discussion with experienced colleagues in the field we cannot recommend the manuscript for pubilcation as the very high standards of the journal are not met. 返回小木虫查看更多
二审意见很明显拒稿,有可能你没有按一审意见修改
也就是你的修改没有达到审稿人要求,至于编辑的回复,有可能是官方回复,他觉得一审问题不大,审稿人也没有拒稿,个人意见,仅供参考,按意见可以好好再修改
一审意见没有提出很多问题,很认真的修改了,都是些小问题的。如下
- many shortcuts make the manuscript confusing
- what is the clinical consequence?
- the tables and figures are not in a good quality and they are confusing
- please don`t write the name of a medication (Gonal-F) in the paper
,
这个就不得而知了 确实也不是很难回答 有可能文章还有其他问题 审稿人没指出来
站内有这样的例子,同一个审稿人,一审和二审的意见截然相反。有可能楼主的研究成果对审稿人有启发,试图通过拒稿来让自己的文章先发表。鉴于审稿人的意见没有明显错误,楼主无法申诉,尽快改投吧。
申诉一下试试吧,差不多四个月没有了。挺郁闷的。
别在这一棵树上耗着了,尽快转投吧