当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >Materials Design审稿

Materials Design审稿

作者 faming
来源: 小木虫 1200 24 举报帖子
+关注

Materials and Design 影响因子1.5左右,我已经为这个杂志审稿了不下50篇了。以下是我自己的一些个人经验。

首先,这个杂志对审稿人的邀请一般如下:
Given your expertise in this area, I would appreciate your comments on the above paper. I have included the abstract of the manuscript below to provide you with an overview.

If you accept this invitation, your comments will be due by 时间, 2011. If you are unable to act as a reviewer at this time, I would greatly appreciate your suggestions for alternative reviewers.

这个杂志的主编给审稿人的时间是2周,我审稿从来不会超过2周,昨天刚审了一个稿件,我今天就返回了意见,我要对投稿的人负责,我知道他们很着急,大家都不愿意等很长时间。
此外,该杂志一般有2个审稿人,主编一般还是很温和的,比较容易中。
一般评审内容包括下面几条:
For each question, please use the following scale to answer (place an x in the space provided):

"To what extent does the article meet this criterion?"

0     Fails by a large amount
1     Fails by a small amount
2     Succeeds by a small amount
3     Succeeds by a large amount
4     Not applicable

The subject addressed in this article is worthy of investigation.
   
0 __1 __2 __ 3 __4


The information presented was new.

0 __1 __2 __3 __4


The conclusions were supported by the data.

0 __1 __2 __ 3 __4


Is there a financial or other conflict of interest between your work and that of the authors?

YES __  NO__
Please give a frank account of the strengths and weaknesses of the article:

希望投稿的人多从上面几个角度认真思考,写好文章,祝大家投稿顺利!! 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • cai05330

    我个人觉得审稿太快并不太好,一般审稿时候也要看一下该防线现有的研究现状,然后才能综合得到该文章是否有价值。
    PS:最近两个月被M&D录用两篇,很喜欢这期刊

  • 科大小鱼儿

    不太清楚这个杂志,主要是做材料模拟的吧。

  • starx

    想问的问题?
    听说这是扩充版,我一直不懂这什么意思
    总归他应该是属于SCI 吧??

  • ttkxgp7978

    引用回帖:
    Originally posted by faming at 2011-01-20 21:15:01:
    Materials and Design 影响因子1.5左右,我已经为这个杂志审稿了不下50篇了。以下是我自己的一些个人经验。

    首先,这个杂志对审稿人的邀请一般如下:
    Given your expertise in this area, I would appreciate ...

    期刊让我很头疼,我当时选择的是2个美国学者,都是名气很大的,当时听说编辑不愿意选中国人审稿。唉!第一才审稿意见:
    Reviewers' comments:
    Reviewer #1: This article studied the effect of Rare Earths on the Impact Toughness of Low-Carbon Steel. It is one of very important topics. However, there were many and many parts are hard to understand. So, this reviewer suggest resubmission after improving the language.

    Reviewer #2: The authors don't offer any insights on how they formulated the exact composition of the B450NBRE Steel with the largest impact toughness before conducting an ultimate analysis,

    The discussion part of the manuscript is merely a literature review without any additional information introduced or discussed by the authors
    论文讨论部分几乎重新书写,所以回信时候也没有明确表明具体修改位置,只是说讨论部分已经修改并重新书写。第二次审稿意见刚刚接到:
    Reviewers' comments:


    Reviewer #1: On the one hand, the authors didn't revise the manuscript carefully. There are still so many grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences, i.e., the level of English throughout this manuscript does not meet the journal's desired standard. On the other hand, the novelty of this manuscript is not obvious.

    So, this reviewer strongly think that this manuscript cannot be accepted by this journal.

    Reviewer #2: The revised manuscript reflect the reviewers' comments and suggestions

    the clarity and contributions are improved


    Editor: Please get your paper professional language reviewed in order to be able to proceed further with your paper.

    所以,我觉得应该是没有希望啦!很无助,其实我很希望可以提出具体修改意见

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓