小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » SCI期刊点评

基本资料

该期刊扩展资料,欢迎小木虫资深虫友来补充。一起完善,供大家参考。为了保证质量,目前只有金币大于50个的虫子可以参与期刊点评。
MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
MODEL SIMUL MATER SC
我要投此期刊
出版周期: Bimonthly
出版ISSN: 0965-0393
通讯方式: IOP PUBLISHING LTD, DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL, ENGLAND, BS1 6BE
期刊主页网址: http://iopscience.iop.org/0965-0393/
在线投稿网址: http://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/iop-msmse
其他相关链接: Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Current Contents - Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
Current Contents - Engineering, Computing & Technology

虫友提供资料,仅供参考( 18 人参与,34496 人阅读)

工程与材料(4) 数理科学(2) 力学(2) 固体力学(2) 金属基复合材料(1) 无机非金属材料(1) 粉末冶金与粉体工程(1) 高电压与绝缘(1) 电气科学与工程(1) 金属材料(1) 冶金与矿业(1)
投稿录用比例: 66% (计算公式:参与点评网友投稿录用人数/总点评网友人数×100%)
审稿速度: 平均 1.66667 个月的审稿周期(非官方数据)
审稿费用: -(非官方数据)
版面费用: -(非官方数据)

期刊“小木虫投稿价值”历年趋势图(投稿价值趋势图供投稿时选择参考。其中数据不承担真实性)

打开手机扫一扫
查看影响因子

期刊点评列表

#1 作者:lareina1 (联系作者 | 作者点评过的期刊)   时间:2018-04-06 11:39 纠错举报

IOP的如果有一个被拒了, 这篇论文就不能再投他旗下的其他杂志。。。别问我怎么知道的。。。

#2 作者:lareina1 (联系作者 | 作者点评过的期刊)   时间:2018-03-09 16:02 纠错举报

虽然悲剧了,但是把时间说一下,供参考吧。。
18年2月11号投的,很快就awaiting referee reports,到2018年3月8号,查询状态就是awaiting decision,晚上十一点多发现reject了。。。纯模拟没有试验,感觉很受伤害。
下面是给的意见,欢迎大家一起探讨。。

REFEREE REPORT(S):

COMMENTS FROM EDITORIAL BOARD:
Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
This work is, at the very best, at the borders of the scope of MSMSE, which reads "new research work that advances the understanding and prediction of material behaviour at scales from atomistic to macroscopic through modelling and simulation." The main reason for rejecting this manuscript is that the model contains no aspect of structure at all; instead, it uses a rule-of-mixture approach together with a very old pressure-dependent yield function. The modeling referred to dates back to the 1970, and does not recognize developments in the since the 80's by Riedel and others.

Additional critical issues:
a) The authors emphasize a difference in the efficiency of single versus double action compaction, that is motivated by Fig. 4. They do no, however, give any explanation for this difference. In fact, the observations is surprising since double action compaction can be regarded as single action compaction relative to the symmetry plane. The only difference then is the length over which the die wall friction works. If this line of reasoning is correct, there should be an inherent length effect in compation, and I would be surprised if this is not known in the field.
b) The data are fit to empirical expressions with at least five decimals. In view of the crudeness of the material model, the number of significant digits must be much smaller.

Minor comments:
- It is not _in_ the FEA analysis that Young's modulus and yield strength are calculated by a Voigt mixture, but _for the purpose of_.
- the definition of the relative density (in eq. (6)) comes much later than its first mention (above (3)).
- the origin of the expressions (11) and (12) is unclear.

研究方向: 工程与材料 冶金与矿业 粉末冶金与粉体工程

投稿周期: 约1个月

录用情况: 已投被拒

#3 作者:EmuchNet (联系作者 | 作者点评过的期刊)   时间:2017-09-25 10:50 纠错举报

2017年影响因子: 1.891

#4 作者:amber2076 (联系作者 | 作者点评过的期刊)   时间:2017-01-24 09:25 纠错举报

这个是open access吗?

研究方向: 工程与材料 电气科学与工程 高电压与绝缘

#5 作者:EmuchNet (联系作者 | 作者点评过的期刊)   时间:2016-06-14 15:18 纠错举报

2015年影响因子: 1.859
请登录 查看更多...